About John

John presents Jesus as the divine Son of God, using seven signs and seven "I am" statements to demonstrate His deity and the promise of eternal life through belief in Him.

Author: John the ApostleWritten: c. AD 85-95Reading time: ~7 minVerses: 54
Deity of ChristEternal LifeBeliefSignsLoveHoly Spirit

King James Version

John 4

54 verses with commentary

Jesus and the Woman of Samaria

When therefore the Lord knew how the Pharisees had heard that Jesus made and baptized more disciples than John,

View commentary
Jesus' knowledge that the Pharisees had heard about His growing ministry demonstrates His omniscience and awareness of developing opposition. The comparison between Jesus and John sets up the transition of ministries—the lesser must decrease as the greater increases. Christ's sovereign awareness extends to all circumstances, including political and religious threats.

(Though Jesus himself baptized not, but his disciples,)

View commentary
John's clarification that Jesus Himself didn't baptize but His disciples did prevents misunderstanding about the necessity of apostolic baptism. This shows that the efficacy of sacraments depends on Christ's institution, not the administrator's status. The Reformed doctrine holds that valid baptism requires only a lawful administrator and proper elements, not apostolic hands.

He left Judaea, and departed again into Galilee.

View commentary
Jesus' departure from Judea represents strategic wisdom, not fearful retreat. He sovereignly controls the timing of confrontation with authorities. This illustrates that while Christ was completely faithful to His mission, He also exercised prudence in avoiding premature conflict. The Reformed ethic affirms both courage and wisdom in spiritual warfare.

And he must needs go through Samaria.

View commentary
The phrase 'he must needs go through Samaria' indicates divine necessity, not mere geography. Jews typically avoided Samaria, traveling longer routes to bypass this region of mixed-race people they despised. Christ's intentional journey reveals His mission transcends Jewish-Samaritan hostility. The divine 'must' foreshadows His appointment with the woman at the well—a Samaritan, a woman, a sinner—demonstrating that God's grace crosses all human barriers.

Then cometh he to a city of Samaria, which is called Sychar, near to the parcel of ground that Jacob gave to his son Joseph.

View commentary
The city of Sychar connects to Jacob's history in the land, linking Jesus' mission to Israel's patriarchal heritage. John emphasizes the historical and theological continuity between Old Testament promises and their New Testament fulfillment in Christ. The plot of ground Jacob gave Joseph symbolizes Israel's inheritance, which Christ has come to claim and transform.

Now Jacob's well was there. Jesus therefore, being wearied with his journey, sat thus on the well: and it was about the sixth hour.

View commentary
Jesus' weariness and sitting by the well affirms His genuine humanity—the incarnate Son experienced physical exhaustion. The sixth hour (noon) and His thirst emphasize His identification with human weakness. This moment of need sets the stage for offering living water, illustrating how Christ's humiliation enables our exaltation.

There cometh a woman of Samaria to draw water: Jesus saith unto her, Give me to drink.

View commentary
Jesus' simple request 'Give me to drink' breaks multiple social barriers: He speaks to a woman, a Samaritan, and one of questionable character. His initiative in conversation demonstrates the grace that seeks sinners. This request, though addressing physical need, opens dialogue toward spiritual truth—a pattern for evangelism.

(For his disciples were gone away unto the city to buy meat.)

View commentary
The disciples' absence to buy food creates opportunity for Jesus' private conversation with the woman. God's providence arranges circumstances for gospel encounters. Their later surprise (v. 27) at finding Jesus talking with her reveals how radical His ministry was, even to those closest to Him.

Then saith the woman of Samaria unto him, How is it that thou, being a Jew, askest drink of me, which am a woman of Samaria? for the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans.

View commentary
The woman's response reveals the depth of Jewish-Samaritan hostility, making Jesus' request remarkable. The parenthetical explanation ('For the Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans') emphasizes how grace crosses boundaries that sin and pride erect. Christ's gospel demolishes ethnic, social, and religious barriers.

Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, Give me to drink; thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have given thee living water.

View commentary
Jesus shifts from physical water to 'living water,' a rabbinic term for running water but here meaning the Holy Spirit and eternal life. His statement 'If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it is' points to two connected truths: salvation as gift (not earned) and Christ's identity as giver. Reformed theology emphasizes that regeneration by the Spirit is prerequisite to recognizing Christ's person and benefits.

The woman saith unto him, Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep: from whence then hast thou that living water?

View commentary
The woman's literal interpretation ('thou hast nothing to draw with') mirrors Nicodemus' confusion about new birth (John 3:4), showing natural inability to grasp spiritual truth apart from illumination. Her question 'whence then hast thou that living water?' will find its answer in Christ's divine identity and mission.

Art thou greater than our father Jacob, which gave us the well, and drank thereof himself, and his children, and his cattle?

View commentary
The woman's question whether Jesus is 'greater than our father Jacob' is ironic—she doesn't realize she's speaking to Jacob's Lord. Her appeal to ancestral authority and historical precedent reflects human tendency to value tradition over present divine revelation. Christ indeed surpasses all patriarchs as the eternal Son.

Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again:

View commentary
Christ contrasts physical water with spiritual: 'Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again.' Physical water temporarily satisfies but must be repeatedly consumed. This applies to all earthly pleasures, achievements, and relationships—they cannot permanently satisfy the soul's deepest longings. Only Christ provides lasting satisfaction. This diagnostic truth exposes humanity's futility: we drink from broken cisterns (Jeremiah 2:13) that never truly quench spiritual thirst.

But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.

View commentary
Jesus' promise to the Samaritan woman introduces the profound metaphor of 'living water' (ὕδωρ ζῶν/hydōr zōn), contrasting physical water from Jacob's well with spiritual water He provides. The phrase 'shall never thirst' (οὐ μὴ διψήσει εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα) uses the strongest Greek negative construction, indicating absolute and eternal satisfaction. Unlike physical water that temporarily quenches thirst, requiring daily return to the well, Jesus' water produces permanent satisfaction. The imagery shifts: the water Jesus gives 'shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life' (γενήσεται ἐν αὐτῷ πηγὴ ὕδατος ἁλλομένου εἰς ζωὴν αἰώνιον). This water becomes an internal, self-renewing source. The verb 'springing up' (ἁλλομένου/hallomenou) conveys leaping, bubbling, flowing—dynamic, abundant life. The destination is 'everlasting life' (ζωὴν αἰώνιον)—not merely endless existence but qualitative, eternal life in communion with God. Jesus is describing the Holy Spirit's indwelling (John 7:37-39), who regenerates believers and continuously sustains spiritual life. This living water contrasts with all human religious effort—it's received, not achieved; internal, not external; eternal, not temporary. The woman's religious tradition (Samaritan worship at Mount Gerizim) and moral failure (five husbands) left her spiritually dry. Jesus offers what no human relationship, religious system, or temporary pleasure can provide: eternal satisfaction through the Spirit's indwelling.

The woman saith unto him, Sir, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw.

View commentary
The woman's request 'Sir, give me this water' shows emerging interest but continued misunderstanding. Her motive remains earthly comfort ('that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw'), yet Jesus works through mixed motives to bring spiritual awakening. God meets us in our partial understanding and draws us toward truth.

Jesus saith unto her, Go, call thy husband, and come hither.

View commentary
Jesus' command 'Go, call thy husband' redirects conversation from physical to moral need, exposing her sin. This demonstrates that genuine gospel ministry addresses not just spiritual thirst but the sin that causes it. Conviction of sin precedes reception of grace in Reformed soteriology—we must know ourselves as sinners before embracing Christ as Savior.

The woman answered and said, I have no husband. Jesus said unto her, Thou hast well said, I have no husband:

View commentary
The woman's response 'I have no husband' is technically true but deliberately evasive. Jesus' commendation 'Thou hast well said' acknowledges her literal truthfulness while preparing to reveal deeper knowledge. This shows how Christ's omniscience penetrates our half-truths and self-justifications.

For thou hast had five husbands; and he whom thou now hast is not thy husband: in that saidst thou truly.

View commentary
Jesus' revelation of her five husbands and current cohabitation demonstrates divine omniscience and prophetic insight. This knowledge serves pastoral purpose—not to shame but to awaken consciousness of sin and need for forgiveness. The phrase 'in that saidst thou truly' shows Christ values honesty, even when it reveals failure.

The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet.

View commentary
The woman's recognition 'Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet' shows spiritual awakening—she moves from seeing Jesus as a Jewish man (v. 9) to recognizing Him as God's spokesperson. This progression illustrates how the Spirit uses conviction of sin to open eyes to Christ's identity.

Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship.

View commentary
The woman raises the ancient dispute about worship location—Gerizim versus Jerusalem. This theological deflection is classic: when convicted of personal sin, we often shift to doctrinal debates. Yet Jesus will use her question to teach profound truth about worship in Spirit and truth, showing God's patience with our evasions.

Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh , when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.

View commentary
Jesus' prophetic announcement that true worship will transcend location ('neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem') anticipates the New Covenant. The coming 'hour' refers to His death, resurrection, and the Spirit's outpouring, which enables worship in Spirit and truth regardless of geography. Reformed theology emphasizes that Christ's fulfillment of temple worship frees us from sacred spaces.

Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.

View commentary
Jesus' declaration 'salvation is of the Jews' affirms God's redemptive plan through Israel and the Jewish Messiah. 'Ye worship ye know not what' indicates that Samaritan religion, lacking the prophets and full Scripture, was deficient in revelation. Reformed theology affirms that only worship based on God's self-revelation in Scripture is acceptable—sincerity without truth is insufficient.

But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.

View commentary
Jesus declares 'the hour cometh, and now is' when true worship occurs 'in spirit and in truth', transcending location (Jerusalem vs. Gerizim). 'In spirit' means from the heart, enabled by the Holy Spirit, not mere external ritual. 'In truth' requires accordance with God's revelation, especially Christ who is Truth personified (14:6). This prophecy anticipates Pentecost when worship would no longer be geographically centered but Spirit-empowered worldwide. The 'now is' shows the age of spiritual worship began with Christ's coming.

God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

View commentary
God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. This profound declaration by Jesus to the Samaritan woman establishes the fundamental nature of God and the essential character of true worship. The Greek phrase pneuma ho theos (πνεῦμα ὁ θεός) affirms that God's essence is spirit—immaterial, invisible, and transcendent. This challenges both the Samaritan fixation on Mount Gerizim and the Jewish focus on the Jerusalem temple as the only legitimate worship location.

The verb proskyneo (προσκυνέω, "worship") means to bow down or prostrate oneself in reverence. Jesus declares that worshipers must worship en pneumati kai aletheia (ἐν πνεύματι καὶ ἀληθείᾳ, "in spirit and in truth"). Worship "in spirit" means worship that engages the inner person through the Holy Spirit, not merely external rituals or locations. Worship "in truth" requires alignment with God's revealed reality in Christ, who is the Truth incarnate (John 14:6).

This verse revolutionizes worship, moving beyond geographical locations and ceremonial systems to spiritual reality and covenant faithfulness. It anticipates the New Covenant where the Spirit indwells believers (John 7:37-39), enabling authentic worship through Christ the mediator. True worship requires both spiritual vitality (the Spirit's enablement) and theological accuracy (conformity to revealed truth).

The woman saith unto him, I know that Messias cometh, which is called Christ: when he is come, he will tell us all things.

View commentary
The woman's Messianic expectation ('Messias cometh') shows Samaritan hope for the Prophet like Moses who would 'tell us all things.' Her statement sets up Jesus' climactic self-revelation. Even deficient theology retained truth about God's promise to send a definitive revealer and redeemer.

Jesus saith unto her, I that speak unto thee am he.

View commentary
Jesus' declaration 'I that speak unto thee am he' (Greek: egō eimi, 'I am') represents His clearest messianic claim thus far in John's Gospel. That He reveals this to a Samaritan woman of questionable character demonstrates the gospel's universality and grace. God's election includes unlikely recipients, confounding human expectations of who deserves revelation.

The Fields Are White for Harvest

And upon this came his disciples, and marvelled that he talked with the woman: yet no man said, What seekest thou? or, Why talkest thou with her?

View commentary
The disciples' astonishment at Jesus talking with a woman reflects cultural norms, yet their restraint from questioning Him shows developing trust in His wisdom. This tension between surprise and submission characterizes discipleship—we constantly encounter Christ doing the unexpected yet learn to trust His purposes.

The woman then left her waterpot, and went her way into the city, and saith to the men,

View commentary
The woman's abandonment of her water pot symbolizes leaving behind earthly concerns for spiritual treasure. Her immediate turn to evangelism ('and went her way into the city') demonstrates genuine conversion—those who have encountered Christ cannot help but share the news. The most unlikely converts often become the most zealous witnesses.

Come, see a man, which told me all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ?

View commentary
The woman's testimony 'Come, see a man, which told me all things that ever I did' invites others to personal encounter rather than mere intellectual assent. Her question 'is not this the Christ?' shows appropriate tentativeness—she points to Christ and lets others investigate. Effective witnessing shares our experience and invites exploration.

Then they went out of the city, and came unto him.

View commentary
The people's immediate response 'Then they went out of the city, and came unto him' demonstrates the power of personal testimony, even from an unlikely source. The verb 'came' (Greek: erchonto, imperfect tense) suggests a continuous stream of people. God uses weak instruments to draw souls to Christ, manifesting His power in human weakness.

In the mean while his disciples prayed him, saying, Master, eat.

View commentary
The disciples' invitation 'Master, eat' shows their concern for Jesus' physical needs, unaware that spiritual food (bringing this woman and village to faith) nourishes Him more deeply. This sets up Jesus' teaching about doing the Father's will as true sustenance.

But he said unto them, I have meat to eat that ye know not of.

View commentary
Jesus' statement 'I have meat to eat that ye know not of' introduces the theme of spiritual nourishment. The phrase 'ye know not of' indicates that the disciples, despite their time with Jesus, still had much to learn about kingdom priorities. Christ's sustenance came from fulfilling the Father's redemptive purposes.

Therefore said the disciples one to another , Hath any man brought him ought to eat?

View commentary
The disciples' literal question 'Hath any man brought him ought to eat?' parallels the Samaritan woman's misunderstanding about water. This repeated pattern in John's Gospel shows how spiritual truths transcend and often initially confuse natural understanding. The disciples must learn to think beyond physical categories.

Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work.

View commentary
Jesus explains that His 'meat' is doing the Father's will and finishing His work. This declaration reveals Christ's singular devotion to redemptive mission. The Reformed emphasis on God's sovereignty in salvation connects to Christ's complete submission to the Father's plan. His food is accomplishing our redemption.

Say not ye, There are yet four months, and then cometh harvest? behold, I say unto you, Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields; for they are white already to harvest.

View commentary
Jesus' agricultural metaphor redirects attention from physical harvest ('four months, and then cometh harvest') to spiritual harvest—the Samaritans approaching are 'white already to harvest.' The fields (Greek: chōrai) may literally be the region (Samaria) and the people streaming toward them. God's sovereignty ensures harvest readiness according to His timing.

And he that reapeth receiveth wages, and gathereth fruit unto life eternal: that both he that soweth and he that reapeth may rejoice together.

View commentary
Jesus promises that the reaper 'receiveth wages, and gathereth fruit unto life eternal' so that sower and reaper may rejoice together. This depicts cooperative ministry across time—some plant, some water, some harvest, but all share the joy. The fruit is eternal life for believers, glory to God, and joy to workers.

And herein is that saying true, One soweth , and another reapeth.

View commentary
The saying 'One soweth, and another reapeth' acknowledges different roles in gospel ministry. No worker accomplishes conversion alone—we stand in succession with those who preceded us and prepare for those who follow. This counters pride (we didn't do it all) and encourages faithfulness (our work matters even if we don't see harvest).

I sent you to reap that whereon ye bestowed no labour: other men laboured, and ye are entered into their labours.

View commentary
Jesus declares 'I sent you to reap that whereon ye bestowed no labour' acknowledging that others (prophets, John the Baptist) prepared the harvest. The disciples enter into 'labours' (Greek: kopos, exhausting toil) of predecessors. Reformed theology emphasizes that we build on the foundation of apostles and prophets, with Christ as cornerstone (Ephesians 2:20).

And many of the Samaritans of that city believed on him for the saying of the woman, which testified, He told me all that ever I did.

View commentary
Many Samaritans believed 'for the saying of the woman,' demonstrating that God uses unlikely witnesses. Her testimony—'He told me all that ever I did'—focused on Christ's supernatural knowledge. The verse emphasizes that faith comes through testimony (cf. Romans 10:17), even from imperfect messengers.

So when the Samaritans were come unto him, they besought him that he would tarry with them: and he abode there two days.

View commentary
The Samaritans' request that Jesus 'abide with them' and His two-day stay demonstrates that belief leads to desire for Christ's presence. Their invitation contrasts with later Jewish rejection (7:1). Jesus' willingness to stay in Samaria, violating Jewish purity customs, shows the gospel transcending ethnic boundaries.

And many more believed because of his own word;

View commentary
The phrase 'many more believed because of his own word' shows progression from secondhand testimony to personal encounter with Christ. Ultimate faith rests not on human testimony but on Christ's self-revelation. This pattern—testimony leads to investigation, investigation to personal faith—models healthy evangelism.

And said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world.

View commentary
The Samaritans' confession that Jesus is 'the Saviour of the world' (not just of Jews) represents remarkable theological insight. This title appears only here and 1 John 4:14, emphasizing universal salvation scope. Their faith no longer depends on the woman's testimony but on personal knowledge. Reformed theology affirms that saving faith requires personal appropriation, not vicarious experience.

Jesus Heals an Official's Son

Now after two days he departed thence, and went into Galilee.

View commentary
After two days, Jesus departed for Galilee, continuing His intentional itinerary. The phrase 'after two days' may parallel Hosea 6:2's prophecy about resurrection. Jesus' movements demonstrate sovereignty—He stays when He wills, departs when He wills, all according to divine purpose.

For Jesus himself testified, that a prophet hath no honour in his own country.

View commentary
Jesus' statement that 'a prophet hath no honour in his own country' explains why He left Judea for Galilee (or why His Galilean ministry would face challenges). This proverb reflects the reality that familiarity breeds contempt—those who knew Jesus' humble origins struggled to accept His divine mission. Truth often faces greatest resistance from those who should know better.

Then when he was come into Galilee, the Galilaeans received him, having seen all the things that he did at Jerusalem at the feast: for they also went unto the feast.

View commentary
The Galileans received Jesus, having seen His works at the Jerusalem feast (likely the Passover of John 2:13-23). Their welcome, based on witnessed miracles, represents an initial but insufficient faith—John's Gospel consistently calls for faith in Christ's person, not merely His works. Yet God works through such preliminary faith toward genuine conversion.

So Jesus came again into Cana of Galilee, where he made the water wine. And there was a certain nobleman, whose son was sick at Capernaum. nobleman: or, courtier, or, ruler

View commentary
Returning to Cana where He performed the first sign, Jesus now performs the second without being physically present—demonstrating His divine omnipresence and power over distance. The nobleman's journey (20 miles from Capernaum) shows desperate faith. This sign escalates from transforming water to controlling life and death, revealing Christ's authority over all creation.

When he heard that Jesus was come out of Judaea into Galilee, he went unto him, and besought him that he would come down, and heal his son: for he was at the point of death.

View commentary
The nobleman's desperate plea for Jesus to 'come down' and heal his dying son demonstrates both faith (he believes Jesus can heal) and weakness (he thinks Jesus must be physically present). His urgency ('for he was at the point of death') reflects natural parental love and creates opportunity for Jesus to strengthen his faith.

Then said Jesus unto him, Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe.

View commentary
Jesus' rebuke 'Except ye see signs and wonders, ye will not believe' addresses not just the nobleman but the Galileans generally. This critiques sign-dependent faith while also testing the nobleman's trust. True faith believes Christ's word apart from visible evidence. The Reformed tradition emphasizes that faith is 'the evidence of things not seen' (Hebrews 11:1).

The nobleman saith unto him, Sir, come down ere my child die.

View commentary
The nobleman's persistence ('Sir, come down ere my child die') shows both admirable faith and lingering limitation—he still thinks Jesus' physical presence is necessary. His address 'Sir' (Greek: kurie, can mean 'Lord' or 'sir') and repeated request demonstrate humble urgency. God honors persistent prayer even when our theology is incomplete.

Jesus saith unto him, Go thy way; thy son liveth. And the man believed the word that Jesus had spoken unto him, and he went his way.

View commentary
Jesus' simple command 'Go thy way; thy son liveth' tests the nobleman's faith—will he believe Christ's word without visible proof? The statement 'the man believed the word that Jesus had spoken' marks transition to mature faith. He departed trusting Christ's declaration, demonstrating that saving faith rests on divine testimony, not empirical evidence.

And as he was now going down, his servants met him, and told him, saying, Thy son liveth.

View commentary
The servants' announcement 'Thy son liveth' confirms Jesus' word precisely. Their coming to meet him shows the household's concern and joy. This confirmation, while not necessary for faith, strengthens it—God often graciously provides evidence after we trust His promises. The servants' report will establish the exact moment of healing.

Then enquired he of them the hour when he began to amend. And they said unto him, Yesterday at the seventh hour the fever left him.

View commentary
The nobleman's inquiry about the timing demonstrates desire to connect the healing with Jesus' word. The servants' specific answer ('Yesterday at the seventh hour the fever left him') provides empirical correlation. This precision serves faith—John includes such details to build confidence that Jesus' word effects immediate results even at distance.

So the father knew that it was at the same hour, in the which Jesus said unto him, Thy son liveth: and himself believed, and his whole house.

View commentary
The father's realization that healing occurred 'at the same hour' when Jesus spoke establishes the miracle's certainty. The result—'himself believed, and his whole house'—shows household conversion following the father's faith. This pattern (household salvation following the head's conversion) appears throughout Acts, reflecting ancient familial structures and covenant theology.

This is again the second miracle that Jesus did, when he was come out of Judaea into Galilee.

View commentary
John's careful enumeration ('second miracle') creates a deliberate parallel between the wedding's joy and this family's restoration. Both signs occurred in Galilee, Christ's home region that would largely reject Him (6:66). The pattern of escalating signs—from wine to healing to life—foreshadows the ultimate sign: Christ's own resurrection. This methodical structure serves John's stated purpose: that readers might believe Jesus is the Christ (20:31).

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study