About Acts

Acts records the birth and growth of the church through the power of the Holy Spirit from Jerusalem to Rome.

Author: LukeWritten: c. AD 62-64Reading time: ~5 minVerses: 40
Holy SpiritWitnessChurch GrowthMissionPersecutionUnity

King James Version

Acts 21

40 verses with commentary

Paul's Journey to Jerusalem

And it came to pass, that after we were gotten from them, and had launched, we came with a straight course unto Coos, and the day following unto Rhodes, and from thence unto Patara:

View commentary
Luke's 'we' narrative resumes, indicating his personal presence with Paul on this final journey to Jerusalem. The detailed itinerary (Coos, Rhodes, Patara) reflects the accuracy of an eyewitness account and demonstrates God's providential guidance through each stage of Paul's missionary work. This marks the beginning of Paul's fateful journey that would lead to his arrest and eventual testimony in Rome.

And finding a ship sailing over unto Phenicia, we went aboard, and set forth.

View commentary
And finding a ship sailing over unto Phenicia, we went aboard, and set forth—The simplicity of Luke's 'we' narrative (indicating his personal presence) masks the significance: Paul's final journey to Jerusalem despite prophetic warnings of imprisonment (Acts 21:4, 11). The Greek ἀνεύροντες (aneurontes, 'finding') suggests providential discovery—not chance but divine orchestration of Paul's path toward suffering.

Phoenicia (modern Lebanon) represented the coastal route to Judea. This maritime leg bypassed overland dangers but couldn't evade the spiritual destination: chains awaited in Jerusalem. Paul's resolute we went aboard demonstrates how knowing God's will (including suffering) doesn't paralyze but propels obedience. The journey's mundane details—ships, ports, embarkation—frame profound spiritual courage: Paul sailed toward imprisonment as steadily as toward any missionary field.

Now when we had discovered Cyprus, we left it on the left hand, and sailed into Syria, and landed at Tyre: for there the ship was to unlade her burden.

View commentary
We left it on the left hand (εὐώνυμον, euōnymon)—The nautical detail of passing Cyprus to port (left side) while sailing to Syria reflects Luke's eyewitness precision. Landed at Tyre marks a significant stop where the ship would 'unlade her burden' (ἀποφορτίζομαι, apophortízomai), meaning to discharge cargo. Tyre, once denounced by prophets (Isaiah 23, Ezekiel 26-28), now harbored a Christian community—a powerful testimony to the gospel's transforming reach into formerly pagan strongholds.

And finding disciples, we tarried there seven days: who said to Paul through the Spirit, that he should not go up to Jerusalem.

View commentary
The disciples at Tyre, speaking 'through the Spirit,' warned Paul not to go to Jerusalem. This presents a tension between prophetic warning and apostolic calling - the Spirit revealed the danger ahead, but Paul understood his divine commission required him to press forward. This demonstrates that spiritual discernment sometimes involves weighing multiple Spirit-led impressions against God's overarching mission.

And when we had accomplished those days, we departed and went our way; and they all brought us on our way, with wives and children, till we were out of the city: and we kneeled down on the shore, and prayed.

View commentary
They all brought us on our way (προπέμπω, propémpō)—The early church practice of escorting travelers demonstrated covenant loyalty and practical care. The inclusion of 'wives and children' in this farewell underscores the family nature of first-century Christianity. We kneeled down on the shore, and prayed—Public prayer at the water's edge recalls biblical precedents (Acts 16:13) and demonstrated the church's dependence on God rather than human strength. This communal intercession before Paul's dangerous journey manifested genuine spiritual fellowship.

And when we had taken our leave one of another, we took ship; and they returned home again.

View commentary
When we had taken our leave (ἀσπάζομαι, aspázomai)—The Greek conveys affectionate farewell between believers who may never meet again on earth. The pattern of 'we took ship; and they returned home again' captures the bittersweet reality of Christian mission—some are called to go, others to stay and sustain home communities. Both callings serve God's kingdom purposes, neither superior to the other. This verse exemplifies the mutual love and painful partings that characterized early church relationships.

And when we had finished our course from Tyre, we came to Ptolemais, and saluted the brethren, and abode with them one day.

View commentary
We had finished our course (διανύω, dianýō)—Paul's maritime journey continued with divine purpose directing each leg. The Greek suggests completing a measured stage, not random wandering. We came to Ptolemais—This brief stop at another ancient Phoenician city revealed the expanding network of Christian communities along the Mediterranean coast. Saluted the brethren, and abode with them one day—Even a single day's fellowship strengthened bonds between scattered believers and demonstrated the universal family created by the gospel across ethnic and geographic boundaries.

And the next day we that were of Paul's company departed, and came unto Caesarea: and we entered into the house of Philip the evangelist, which was one of the seven; and abode with him.

View commentary
Philip the evangelist, last mentioned in Acts 8:40, now appears as an established minister in Caesarea. Called 'one of the seven,' this reference to the original deacons (Acts 6:5) shows how servant leadership leads to greater gospel ministry. Philip's household became a base for Paul's team, demonstrating the continuity and fellowship of the early church across decades.

And the same man had four daughters, virgins, which did prophesy.

View commentary
The mention of Philip's 'four daughters which did prophesy' highlights the Spirit's distribution of gifts regardless of gender. The Greek 'propheteuō' indicates they regularly exercised prophetic gifting, though within the ordered structure Paul elsewhere describes. This demonstrates the early church's recognition of women's Spirit-empowered ministry within appropriate boundaries.

And as we tarried there many days, there came down from Judaea a certain prophet, named Agabus.

View commentary
Agabus, previously mentioned in Acts 11:28, appears again with prophetic warning. His arrival 'from Judaea' brought intelligence about the Jerusalem situation and impending danger. God's repeated warnings through multiple prophets demonstrated His loving concern for Paul, even while Paul's apostolic calling required him to proceed despite the risks.

And when he was come unto us, he took Paul's girdle, and bound his own hands and feet, and said, Thus saith the Holy Ghost, So shall the Jews at Jerusalem bind the man that owneth this girdle, and shall deliver him into the hands of the Gentiles.

View commentary
Agabus's prophetic sign-act, binding his own hands and feet with Paul's belt, echoed Old Testament prophetic symbolism (compare Jeremiah 13:1-11, Ezekiel 4). The detailed prophecy - 'the Jews at Jerusalem shall bind the man' - proved remarkably accurate, though the Romans actually performed the arrest. This demonstrates how prophetic revelation conveys essential truth while details may unfold differently than expected.

And when we heard these things, both we, and they of that place, besought him not to go up to Jerusalem.

View commentary
Both we, and they of that place, besought him (παρακαλέω, parakaléō)—The unified pleading from both Paul's traveling companions ('we') and Caesarean believers ('they of that place') revealed genuine love and concern. Yet this emotional appeal, though well-intentioned, opposed God's clear purpose for Paul's Jerusalem journey. The Greek 'besought' suggests urgent, repeated entreaty. This demonstrates that sincere Christian counsel, even from Spirit-filled believers, must be tested against one's divine calling. Affection must not override obedience.

Then Paul answered, What mean ye to weep and to break mine heart? for I am ready not to be bound only, but also to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.

View commentary
Paul's passionate response - 'What mean ye to weep and to break mine heart?' - reveals his deep love for fellow believers while maintaining resolute obedience to Christ. His willingness 'to die at Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus' echoes Jesus's own determination to go to Jerusalem (Luke 9:51) and exemplifies the cruciform life Paul described in his letters (Galatians 2:20).

And when he would not be persuaded, we ceased, saying, The will of the Lord be done.

View commentary
The disciples' submission - 'The will of the Lord be done' - echoes Jesus's Gethsemane prayer and demonstrates mature spiritual discernment. They ceased urging Paul to avoid Jerusalem, recognizing that God's sovereign will transcends human wisdom or safety concerns. This represents the church's corporate surrender to divine providence even when the path leads through suffering.

And after those days we took up our carriages, and went up to Jerusalem.

View commentary
We took up our carriages (ἀποσκευάζω, aposkeuázō)—The Greek refers to gathering baggage and making preparations for the journey, not modern vehicles. This practical detail shows the final preparations before the decisive journey to Jerusalem. The determination to proceed 'after those days' of intense pleading (v. 12-14) reveals Paul's settled conviction that God's will mattered more than personal safety. His company's willing accompaniment demonstrated their submission to God's purposes even when confused or fearful about the outcome.

There went with us also certain of the disciples of Caesarea, and brought with them one Mnason of Cyprus, an old disciple, with whom we should lodge.

View commentary
Certain of the disciples of Caesarea went with Paul, bringing him to Mnason of Cyprus, an old disciple (ἀρχαῖος μαθητής, archaîos mathētḗs)—The description 'old disciple' suggests Mnason was among the earliest converts, possibly from Pentecost or shortly after. His Cypriot origin links to Barnabas (also from Cyprus, Acts 4:36), suggesting the interconnected network of first-generation believers. That Paul's companions arranged lodging with this veteran believer shows the early church's hospitality infrastructure and the honor given to long-faithful disciples.

Paul Visits James

And when we were come to Jerusalem, the brethren received us gladly.

View commentary
The 'brethren' in Jerusalem received Paul 'gladly,' showing the church's unity despite ongoing tensions between Jewish and Gentile believers. This reception would prove crucial as Paul faced accusations from zealous Jewish Christians. The Greek 'asmenōs' (gladly) suggests enthusiastic welcome, demonstrating love that transcended theological disagreements about the law.

And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present.

View commentary
Paul's formal visit to James and the elders represents apostolic accountability and church unity. His detailed report of 'what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry' emphasized divine initiative rather than personal achievement. The focus on God's work through Paul reflected proper humility and gave glory to the true source of missionary success.

And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry.

View commentary
He declared particularly (ἐξηγέομαι, exēgéomai)—Paul gave a detailed, systematic report, the same Greek word used of explaining Scripture. Crucially, he reported what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry—attributing all success to divine agency, not apostolic technique. The phrase 'by his ministry' (διὰ τῆς διακονίας αὐτοῦ, dià tēs diakonías autoû) positions Paul as God's servant-instrument, not the source. This exemplifies biblical leadership that deflects glory to God while faithfully reporting His works. Paul's focus on Gentile conversions prepared the Jerusalem leadership to understand God's larger purposes.

And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law:

View commentary
The Jerusalem elders' report that 'many thousands' (Greek 'myriades,' literally 'myriads') of Jews believed demonstrated the gospel's powerful impact even in Judaism's heartland. However, these believers remained 'zealous of the law,' creating tension with Paul's law-free Gentile mission. This verse captures the transitional period as God's redemptive program moved from Israel-centered to church-centered.

And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs.

View commentary
The elders' concern about false reports - that Paul taught Jews 'to forsake Moses' - highlights how Paul's message was often misunderstood and misrepresented. Paul never taught Jews to abandon their cultural heritage, only that law-keeping couldn't save. This distinction between cultural practice and soteriological necessity remains crucial for gospel clarity.

What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come.

View commentary
What is it therefore?—This rhetorical question reflects the Jerusalem leaders' practical concern about managing the situation Paul's arrival created. The multitude must needs come together (πάντως ἀκούσεται, pántōs akoúsetai)—Literally 'they will certainly hear,' acknowledging the inevitability that Jewish Christians would learn of Paul's presence. The elders' concern wasn't Paul's guilt but managing community perceptions poisoned by false reports. This verse captures the tension between theological truth and pastoral wisdom—how to maintain gospel integrity while navigating cultural sensitivities in a transitional moment of salvation history.

Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them;

View commentary
The elders proposed a compromise: Paul should publicly sponsor four men's Nazirite vows, demonstrating his respect for Jewish customs. This represents Christian liberty applied wisely - Paul could participate in Jewish ceremonies (compare 1 Corinthians 9:20) without compromising gospel truth. The plan sought to preserve peace and witness while maintaining theological integrity.

Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law.

View commentary
Paul's willing participation in the purification ritual demonstrated his principle of becoming 'all things to all men' (1 Corinthians 9:22). His public temple presence with these men would testify that he 'walkest orderly, and keepest the law' in matters of cultural practice. This showed Paul's consistency - liberty for Gentiles didn't mean contempt for Jewish heritage.

As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication.

View commentary
As touching the Gentiles which believe—The elders clarify that their proposed Jewish vow (v. 23-24) doesn't contradict the Jerusalem Council's decree (Acts 15:20, 29). The four prohibitions—things offered to idols... blood... strangled... fornication—addressed practices particularly offensive to Jewish sensibility, facilitating Jewish-Gentile fellowship without requiring circumcision or full law-observance. The phrase 'we have written and concluded' (ἐπεστείλαμεν κρίναντες, epestéilamen krínantes) emphasizes the settled, authoritative nature of this decision. This verse demonstrates how biblical Christianity maintains core gospel truth while allowing cultural flexibility in non-essential matters.

Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.

View commentary
Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple—Paul's voluntary participation in Jewish purification rites (καθαρισμός, katharismos) demonstrates his missionary flexibility: 'to the Jews I became as a Jew' (1 Corinthians 9:20). The seven-day Nazirite vow completion involved ritual purification and temple offerings (Numbers 6:13-20). This was not compromise but contextualization—Paul observed ceremonial law to maintain witness among Jewish believers, though he knew such rituals held no saving power.

To signify the accomplishment of the days of purification—The Greek diaggello (announce, declare) indicates Paul formally notified temple authorities of the vow's completion date, when prescribed offerings would be made. This public act showed Paul's respect for Jewish sensibilities despite his doctrine of freedom from the law for salvation.

Paul Arrested in the Temple

And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him,

View commentary
The 'Jews which were of Asia' recognized Paul in the temple and stirred up opposition, demonstrating how his Ephesian ministry (Acts 19) had created lasting enemies. Their accusations would prove false but inflammatory, showing how effective ministry often generates intense opposition. God's sovereignty allowed this arrest to fulfill His purpose of bringing Paul to Rome.

Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place.

View commentary
The three accusations - teaching against 'the people, the law, and this place' (temple), plus bringing Greeks into the temple - represented the most inflammatory charges possible. Though false, they were calculated to incite mob violence. This parallels accusations against Jesus (Matthew 26:61) and Stephen (Acts 6:13), showing that faithful witnesses often face similar opposition to their Lord.

(For they had seen before with him in the city Trophimus an Ephesian, whom they supposed that Paul had brought into the temple.)

View commentary
The accusation about Trophimus, an Ephesian Gentile, proved baseless - they had 'supposed' Paul brought him into the temple based on seeing them together in the city. This demonstrates how assumptions and prejudice fuel false accusations. The tragedy was that violence erupted based on supposition rather than evidence, yet God used even this injustice to advance His purposes.

And all the city was moved, and the people ran together : and they took Paul, and drew him out of the temple: and forthwith the doors were shut.

View commentary
All the city was moved (ἐκινήθη ἡ πόλις, ekinethe he polis)—The verb 'moved' suggests violent agitation, like an earthquake shaking a city. The mob's fury stemmed from false accusations that Paul brought Gentiles into the temple's inner courts (v. 28-29), a capital offense punishable by death even for Roman citizens. They took Paul, and drew him out of the temple—The Greek heilkusan (dragged) implies violent force. Removing Paul before killing him prevented temple defilement by bloodshed, showing the mob's twisted priorities.

Forthwith the doors were shut—Temple Levites immediately closed the massive gates separating the Court of the Gentiles from the inner courts, preventing further ritual defilement. Ironically, those claiming zeal for the temple's purity were attempting murder, violating the sixth commandment of the very law they professed to defend.

And as they went about to kill him, tidings came unto the chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar.

View commentary
The Greek 'zetountōn' (were about) indicates the mob intended to kill Paul, showing the rage religious jealousy can produce. The Roman garrison's intervention prevented Paul's death, demonstrating God's providential protection through unlikely means. The 'chief captain' (chiliarch, commanding 1000 soldiers) represented Roman authority that would preserve Paul's life and enable his testimony.

Who immediately took soldiers and centurions, and ran down unto them: and when they saw the chief captain and the soldiers, they left beating of Paul.

View commentary
Who immediately took soldiers and centurions—The Roman tribune (χιλίαρχος, chiliarchos, commander of 1,000) Claudius Lysias (23:26) responded swiftly to prevent insurrection. Taking multiple centurions indicates he mobilized significant force—at least 200 soldiers, as each centurion commanded 100 men. Roman military discipline meant instant response to civil unrest.

Ran down unto them—The Fortress Antonia connected to the temple courts by stairs, allowing rapid deployment. The verb katadramon emphasizes urgent descent. They left beating of Paul (ἐπαύσαντο τύπτοντες, epausanto tuptontes)—The mob ceased their assault only when confronted by Roman military power, not from mercy or reason. God's providence used pagan authority to preserve His apostle for further ministry and witness before Caesar (23:11).

Then the chief captain came near, and took him, and commanded him to be bound with two chains; and demanded who he was , and what he had done.

View commentary
The chief captain's immediate action - binding Paul with 'two chains' - fulfilled Agabus's prophecy (Acts 21:11) precisely. His inquiry 'who he was, and what he had done' shows the Romans' concern for order over justice. The Jews' confused responses revealed their accusations were emotional rather than factual, demonstrating how religious rage often lacks substantive foundation.

And some cried one thing, some another, among the multitude: and when he could not know the certainty for the tumult, he commanded him to be carried into the castle.

View commentary
Some cried one thing, some another, among the multitude—The confused mob shouted contradictory accusations, revealing their riot was fueled by passion rather than reasoned justice. This chaotic scene recalls Pilate's trial of Jesus, where crowds manipulated by leaders demanded crucifixion without clear charges. When he could not know the certainty for the tumult (θόρυβος, thorubos, uproar)—The Greek emphasizes confused noise preventing rational investigation.

He commanded him to be carried into the castle—The Roman fortress (παρεμβολή, parembole, military camp) provided security. Lysias's decision to protect Paul rather than release him to the mob demonstrates Roman law's commitment to proper legal process, contrasting with the lawless crowd. God's providence again used Rome's judicial system to preserve Paul for witness before governors, kings, and ultimately Caesar.

And when he came upon the stairs, so it was, that he was borne of the soldiers for the violence of the people.

View commentary
The mob's violence was so intense that soldiers had to carry Paul up the stairs to the fortress, protecting him from being torn apart. The Greek 'bastazō' (carried) suggests he was lifted bodily by soldiers forming a protective shield. This dramatic scene demonstrated both the depth of religious hatred and God's preservation through Roman military intervention.

For the multitude of the people followed after, crying, Away with him.

View commentary
The cry 'Away with him' (Greek 'Aire auton') echoed the mob's demand for Jesus's crucifixion (Luke 23:18, John 19:15), showing Paul's identification with his Savior's sufferings. The violent mob mentality that condemned the sinless Son of God now sought the life of His faithful apostle, demonstrating the continuity of opposition to God's truth across generations.

And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek?

View commentary
Paul's question in Greek - 'May I speak unto thee?' - surprised the Roman commander who assumed he was dealing with an uneducated troublemaker. Paul's cultured Greek immediately changed the commander's perception, opening an opportunity for witness. This demonstrates how God-given education and cultural literacy can create opportunities for gospel advance.

Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?

View commentary
Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar—The tribune confused Paul with a notorious insurgent who, according to Josephus, led 4,000 sicarii (dagger-men, Jewish assassins) to the Mount of Olives, claiming Jerusalem's walls would fall at his command. The Romans crushed this rebellion, but the Egyptian escaped. The tribune assumed Paul was this wanted terrorist, explaining his large military response.

Four thousand men that were murderers (σικαρίων, sikarioi)—These 'dagger-men' mixed in crowds during festivals, assassinating Romans and collaborators. That Lysias thought Paul led such a movement shows how dangerous the situation appeared. Paul's cultured Greek response (v. 37) shocked the tribune, who expected an uneducated revolutionary, not a sophisticated scholar.

But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.

View commentary
Paul's self-identification - 'a Jew of Tarsus... a citizen of no mean city' - established his credibility without boasting. Tarsus's reputation for learning and commerce gave Paul standing, while his Jewish identity connected him to those he sought to address. His request to speak showed courage and wisdom in seizing an opportunity for witness despite having just faced a murderous mob.

And when he had given him licence, Paul stood on the stairs, and beckoned with the hand unto the people. And when there was made a great silence, he spake unto them in the Hebrew tongue, saying,

View commentary
Paul's gesture for silence and choice to speak 'in the Hebrew tongue' demonstrated cultural sensitivity and rhetorical skill. Speaking Hebrew (likely Aramaic, the common Jewish language) created immediate connection with his audience and showed he was no apostate. The resulting 'great silence' gave Paul opportunity to present his testimony, showing how God opens doors even in hostile circumstances.

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study