About Acts

Acts records the birth and growth of the church through the power of the Holy Spirit from Jerusalem to Rome.

Author: LukeWritten: c. AD 62-64Reading time: ~5 minVerses: 42
Holy SpiritWitnessChurch GrowthMissionPersecutionUnity

King James Version

Acts 5

42 verses with commentary

Ananias and Sapphira

But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession,

View commentary
The conjunction 'But' (Greek 'de') signals dramatic contrast with Barnabas's genuine sacrifice (Acts 4:36-37). Ananias and Sapphira's story functions as warning against hypocrisy in Christian community. Their sin wasn't failing to give all but pretending they had. The Greek 'aner tis' (a certain man) introduces them as representative examples - every generation faces this temptation to counterfeit spirituality for reputation. This narrative establishes that God sees hearts, not merely actions.

And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles' feet.

View commentary
The phrase 'kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it' describes deliberate, conspiratorial deception. The Greek 'enosphisato' (kept back) is used in Joshua 7:1 for Achan's theft, linking this sin to Israel's conquest crisis. This wasn't mere withholding but fraudulent representation. 'His wife also being privy' (Greek 'syneidyia,' conscious knowledge) makes this premeditated conspiracy, not impulsive lie. Bringing 'a certain part' while implying the whole exemplifies Jesus' warning about serving two masters.

But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land? to lie to: or, to deceive

View commentary
Peter's penetrating question reveals that Ananias' sin originated in satanic influence ('why hath Satan filled thine heart'), yet holds him accountable for yielding to it. The specific sin of lying 'to the Holy Spirit' identifies the Spirit's deity—lying to Him equals lying to God (v. 4). This establishes the Spirit's personhood and divine nature.

Whiles it remained, was it not thine own ? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God.

View commentary
Peter's penetrating questions - 'while it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power?' - establish that giving was voluntary, not coerced. The sin wasn't incomplete donation but deceptive representation. The devastating accusation 'thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God' reveals hypocrisy's true nature: attempting to deceive God. The Greek 'pseudomai' (lied) indicates deliberate falsehood. Peter's final question 'why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart?' identifies the internal source - sin begins in heart before manifesting in action.

And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things.

View commentary
Ananias's immediate death - 'hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost' - demonstrates divine judgment's severity. The Greek 'ekpsychō' (gave up the ghost) means 'breathed out his soul,' occurring without physical cause. This judgment served multiple purposes: purifying the church, authenticating apostolic authority, and warning against hypocrisy. The statement 'great fear came on all them that heard these things' shows the intended effect - holy reverence for God's presence and purity standards.

And the young men arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and buried him.

View commentary
The young men's immediate action - 'arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and buried him' - fulfilled cultural necessity (Jewish burial within 24 hours) while removing evidence of judgment. The Greek 'systellō' (wound up) describes wrapping in burial cloths. The efficiency suggests divine judgment was understood and accepted. This swift removal also prevented Sapphira from being warned, allowing her independent test. The burial's immediacy emphasizes finality - no revival, no second chance, underscoring sin's deadly seriousness.

And it was about the space of three hours after, when his wife, not knowing what was done, came in.

View commentary
The temporal note - 'it was about the space of three hours after' - provided Sapphira opportunity to repent independently. She 'came in' ignorant of her husband's death, facing the same test he failed. The three-hour gap suggests neither premature warning nor insufficient time for reflection. God's timing gave her maximum opportunity while ensuring independent verification of conspiracy. This detail demonstrates divine fairness - both received identical opportunity to truth or maintain deception.

And Peter answered unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said, Yea, for so much.

View commentary
Peter's direct question - 'Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much' - gave Sapphira clear opportunity to confess truth. The interrogative structure allowed yes/no response, removing ambiguity. Her answer 'Yea, for so much' repeated the lie, confirming conspiracy. The Greek 'nai' (yea) gave emphatic affirmation to known falsehood. Peter's question demonstrates pastoral confrontation's proper method: clear, specific, allowing confession. Her choice to maintain deception sealed judgment.

Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out.

View commentary
Peter's charge - 'How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord?' - reveals the conspiracy's true nature: testing whether God would notice their deception. The Greek 'symphōneō' (agreed together) literally means 'sounded together,' emphasizing coordinated action. 'Tempt' (Greek 'peirazō') means test in sense of probing boundaries, similar to Israel's wilderness testing (Psalm 78:18). The phrase 'behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door' announced imminent identical judgment, giving momentary warning before execution.

Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying her forth, buried her by her husband.

View commentary
Sapphira's death - 'Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost' - mirrored her husband's, confirming divine judgment pattern. The Greek 'parachrēma' (straightway) emphasizes immediacy. The phrase 'at his feet' - where she should have humbly confessed - she instead died in deception. The young men finding her dead 'carried her forth, and buried her by her husband' suggests joint grave, eternally linking them in judgment as they were linked in sin. This parallel judgment emphasized that both bore equal guilt.

And great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things.

View commentary
The summary statement - 'great fear came upon all the church, and upon as many as heard these things' - describes the intended effect: holy reverence. The Greek 'phobos megas' (great fear) indicates more than anxiety - profound awe at God's holiness and justice. This marks the first use of 'ekklesia' (church) in Acts, defining the community as those who fear God's presence. The phrase 'as many as heard' extended impact beyond Jerusalem church to all who heard the report, serving as perpetual warning against hypocrisy.

Many Signs and Wonders

And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people; (and they were all with one accord in Solomon's porch.

View commentary
The statement 'by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people' attributes miracles to divine agency through apostolic ministry. The Greek 'dia tōn cheirōn' (by the hands) emphasizes instrumentality - apostles were conduits, not sources. 'Many signs and wonders' validated the message. The church meeting 'with one accord in Solomon's porch' showed public visibility and unity despite opposition. Solomon's porch provided prominent temple location, demonstrating boldness in claiming Jewish religious space for Christian proclamation.

And of the rest durst no man join himself to them: but the people magnified them.

View commentary
The paradox - 'of the rest durst no man join himself to them: but the people magnified them' - describes simultaneous reverence and distance. The Greek 'kollaō' (join) suggests close association. 'Durst no man' indicates fear-induced hesitation following Ananias and Sapphira's judgment. Yet 'the people magnified them' (Greek 'megalynō,' made great) showed public respect. This tension reveals healthy fear: reverence for holiness without reducing God to cosmic buddy. Casual approach to sacred things was impossible after witnessing divine judgment.

And believers were the more added to the Lord, multitudes both of men and women.)

View commentary
The summary - 'believers were the more added to the Lord, multitudes both of men and women' - shows that judgment purified rather than paralyzed the church. The Greek 'mallon' (the more) indicates accelerated growth, not decline. The passive 'were added to the Lord' emphasizes divine action - God builds His church. Including 'both men and women' highlights gospel's egalitarian nature in patriarchal society. Quality (holiness) and quantity (growth) coexisted - true revival produces both purity and proliferation.

Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them. into: or, in every street

View commentary
The extraordinary scene - 'they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them' - demonstrates radical faith in God's power through apostolic ministry. The Greek 'kan' (at the least) shows desperate hope even for indirect contact. Whether shadows actually healed is debated, but the passage emphasizes people's faith and God's power. This parallels woman touching Jesus' garment (Mark 5:27-29), showing faith grasps available means.

There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one.

View commentary
The expansion - 'there came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits: and they were healed every one' - describes gospel's centrifugal force. Jerusalem became healing center, drawing regional crowds. The inclusive statement 'healed every one' (Greek 'hapantes') emphasizes complete success rate, validating divine power. Distinguishing 'sick folks' from 'vexed with unclean spirits' recognizes both natural illness and demonic oppression, with Christ's power addressing both.

Then the high priest rose up, and all they that were with him, (which is the sect of the Sadducees,) and were filled with indignation, indignation: or, envy

View commentary
The intensified opposition - 'Then the high priest rose up, and all they that were with him, (which is the sect of the Sadducees,) and were filled with indignation' - shows success provoking hostility. The Greek 'zēlos' (indignation) can mean jealousy or righteous zeal, here clearly jealous rage at apostles' influence. Identifying opposition as 'the sect of the Sadducees' emphasizes theological motivation - resurrection preaching undermined their doctrine. The phrase 'rose up' (Greek 'anastas') suggests mobilizing for action, foreshadowing arrest.

And laid their hands on the apostles, and put them in the common prison.

View commentary
The second arrest - 'laid their hands on the apostles, and put them in the common prison' - escalated beyond the first (Acts 4:3). Plural 'apostles' suggests multiple arrests, not just Peter and John. 'Common prison' (Greek 'tērēsis dēmosia,' public holding) was likely more harsh than previous 'hold,' signaling increased severity. This pattern - escalating persecution meeting steadfast witness - characterizes church history. The authorities' inability to stop gospel despite imprisonment demonstrates Word's power transcending human restriction.

But the angel of the Lord by night opened the prison doors, and brought them forth, and said,

View commentary
The miraculous deliverance - 'the angel of the Lord by night opened the prison doors, and brought them forth' - demonstrates God's sovereign control. The Greek 'angelos kyriou' (angel of the Lord) may indicate Christ's pre-incarnate appearances or angelic messenger. The timing 'by night' avoided detection while the opened doors (Greek 'anoixas') showed supernatural power. The command 'Go, stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life' turned deliverance toward mission - freedom served proclamation, not escape.

Go, stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life.

View commentary
The angelic command - 'Go, stand and speak in the temple to the people all the words of this life' - contains crucial elements. 'Go' sends them back to danger. 'Stand' (Greek 'stathentes') implies bold visibility, not hiding. The temple location maximized publicity and risk. 'All the words' (Greek 'panta ta rhēmata') demanded complete message, no compromise. The phrase 'this life' (Greek 'tēs zōēs tautēs') encompasses eternal life through Christ - the gospel's comprehensive scope. This divine commission superseded human prohibition (Acts 4:18).

And when they heard that, they entered into the temple early in the morning , and taught. But the high priest came, and they that were with him, and called the council together, and all the senate of the children of Israel, and sent to the prison to have them brought.

View commentary
The obedient action - 'when they heard that, they entered into the temple early in the morning, and taught' - shows immediate compliance with angelic command despite danger. The Greek 'hypo ton orthron' (early morning) indicates dawn teaching, maximizing time and audience. Meanwhile, 'the high priest came, and they that were with him, and called the council together' mobilized official opposition, unaware prisoners had escaped. The phrase 'all the senate of the children of Israel' (Greek 'pan to presbyterion') describes full Sanhedrin assembly, showing crisis level.

But when the officers came, and found them not in the prison, they returned, and told,

View commentary
The officers' discovery - 'when the officers came, and found them not in the prison, they returned, and told, saying, The prison truly found we shut with all safety, and the keepers standing without before the doors: but when we had opened, we found no man within' - describes supernatural escape with no natural explanation. The doors remained locked, guards unaware, yet prisoners vanished. This irrefutable evidence of divine intervention confronted authorities with God's approval of apostolic ministry.

Saying, The prison truly found we shut with all safety, and the keepers standing without before the doors: but when we had opened, we found no man within.

View commentary
The council's bewilderment - 'Now when the high priest and the captain of the temple and the chief priests heard these things, they doubted of them whereunto this would grow' - shows confusion at God's evident approval. The Greek 'diēporoun' (doubted) means 'thoroughly perplexed,' unable to explain or predict outcomes. Their question 'whereunto this would grow' acknowledges momentum beyond their control. Gamaliel's later speech (v. 34-39) addresses this uncertainty with wise counsel.

Now when the high priest and the captain of the temple and the chief priests heard these things, they doubted of them whereunto this would grow.

View commentary
The report - 'Then came one and told them, saying, Behold, the men whom ye put in prison are standing in the temple, and teaching the people' - must have astonished authorities. The Greek 'idou' (behold) introduces shocking revelation. The phrase 'standing in the temple' (same location as arrest) showed audacious obedience to angelic command despite danger. That they were 'teaching the people' demonstrated priorities: immediate return to mission, not self-protection. This boldness testified to supernatural empowerment.

Then came one and told them, saying, Behold, the men whom ye put in prison are standing in the temple, and teaching the people.

View commentary
The further report - 'Then came one and told them, saying, Behold, the men whom ye put in prison are standing in the temple, and teaching the people' (some manuscripts include additional detail about blood-guilt accusation). The authorities' dilemma - apostles freely teaching despite imprisonment - forced new strategy. Their inability to explain escape or prevent teaching revealed impotence against divine will. This scene demonstrated Psalm 2's reality: rulers conspire vainly against God's Anointed.

Then went the captain with the officers, and brought them without violence: for they feared the people, lest they should have been stoned.

View commentary
The careful rearrest - 'Then went the captain with the officers, and brought them without violence: for they feared the people, lest they should have been stoned' - shows forced restraint. The Greek 'ou meta bias' (without violence) indicates gentle approach contrary to their authority and anger. Fear of popular stoning reversed normal power dynamics - religious leaders fearing crowd, not apostles. This demonstrates gospel's power to transform social structures, with common people defending God's messengers against corrupt authorities.

The Apostles Before the Council

And when they had brought them, they set them before the council: and the high priest asked them,

View commentary
The accusation - 'Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us' - reveals multiple grievances. The phrase 'straitly command' (Greek intensive) emphasizes their authority. Their avoidance of Jesus' name ('this name,' 'this man') shows contempt or fear. 'Filled Jerusalem with your doctrine' admits gospel's saturation despite opposition. The blood-guilt accusation ('intend to bring this man's blood upon us') acknowledges their role in crucifixion they tried denying.

Saying, Did not we straitly command you that ye should not teach in this name? and, behold, ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood upon us.

View commentary
The high priest's question reveals the religious establishment's fear of losing authority ('Did not we straitly command you'). Their concern about 'this man's blood' being upon them ironically recalls their own acceptance of responsibility (Matt. 27:25). The apostles' disobedience to human authority in order to obey God demonstrates the hierarchy of authority: God's commands supersede human commands when they conflict. The growth of Christianity despite official prohibition testifies to divine sovereignty.

Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, We ought to obey God rather than men.

View commentary
We ought to obey God rather than men—Peter states the principle of civil disobedience when human authority contradicts divine command. The Greek 'peitharchein' (obey) denotes submission to authority; 'dei' (ought) indicates moral necessity, not mere preference. This doesn't advocate anarchism but establishes God's ultimate sovereignty over all earthly powers. The apostles' defiance was specific and limited: they continued preaching Christ despite orders to stop, but didn't resist arrest or sentence. This principle later guided Christian martyrs refusing emperor worship while otherwise submitting to Roman law. Daniel 3 and 6 provide Old Testament parallels.

The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree.

View commentary
Peter's climactic declaration - 'The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom ye slew and hanged on a tree' - contrasts divine action ('God... raised') with human crime ('ye slew and hanged'). The Greek 'diacheirisamenoi' (slew) emphasizes violent death by human hands. 'Hanged on a tree' evokes Deuteronomy 21:23's curse, which Christ bore for our redemption (Galatians 3:13). This bold accusation demonstrates apostolic fearlessness - confronting murderers with their guilt while offering salvation. The resurrection vindicated Jesus and condemned His killers.

Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.

View commentary
The triumphant proclamation - 'Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins' - presents Christ's dual role. The Greek 'archēgon' (Prince) means originator, founder, pioneer - Christ blazes the trail we follow. 'Saviour' emphasizes deliverance. The phrase 'exalted with his right hand' indicates God's power elevating Christ to supreme authority. The purpose clause 'to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins' shows repentance itself is divine gift, not human achievement. Forgiveness follows repentance chronologically but both derive from grace.

And we are his witnesses of these things; and so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him.

View commentary
And we are his witnesses of these things—The apostles ground their authority in eyewitness testimony to Christ's resurrection and ascension. The Greek 'martyres' (witnesses) later came to mean 'martyrs' because witnessing often led to death. And so is also the Holy Ghost, whom God hath given to them that obey him—the Spirit's presence confirms apostolic testimony, making God himself a co-witness. The phrase 'them that obey' (τοῖς πειθαρχοῦσιν) uses the same verb as 'obey' in verse 29, creating ironic wordplay: they obey God by disobeying men. The Spirit's gift both validates and empowers witness.

When they heard that, they were cut to the heart, and took counsel to slay them.

View commentary
The hostile reaction - 'When they heard that, they were cut to the heart, and took counsel to slay them' - shows truth's polarizing effect. The Greek 'dieprionto' (cut to the heart) describes sawing-through, violent internal reaction. Unlike Pentecost's crowd whose heart-piercing led to conversion (Acts 2:37, same Greek root), this produces murderous rage. The phrase 'took counsel' (Greek 'ebouleuonto') indicates deliberate planning, not impulsive reaction. The same truth produces repentance in elect, hardening in reprobate - demonstrating double predestination.

Then stood there up one in the council, a Pharisee, named Gamaliel, a doctor of the law, had in reputation among all the people, and commanded to put the apostles forth a little space;

View commentary
Gamaliel's intervention - 'Then stood there up one in the council, a Pharisee, named Gamaliel, a doctor of the law, had in reputation among all the people, and commanded to put the apostles forth a little space' - introduces providential restraint. The Greek 'nomididaskalos' (doctor of the law) indicates expert teacher. His 'reputation among all the people' gave him authority the council respected. Removing apostles allowed frank discussion. Gamaliel's wisdom, though not saving faith, served God's purposes in protecting His servants.

And said unto them, Ye men of Israel, take heed to yourselves what ye intend to do as touching these men.

View commentary
Gamaliel, a respected Pharisee and Paul's former teacher (Acts 22:3), urges caution with the Sanhedrin. His call to 'take heed' demonstrates wisdom in not acting rashly against what might be God's work. Though speaking as an unbeliever, God uses Gamaliel's counsel to protect the infant church, showing divine sovereignty in directing even pagan rulers' decisions for His purposes.

For before these days rose up Theudas, boasting himself to be somebody; to whom a number of men, about four hundred, joined themselves: who was slain; and all, as many as obeyed him, were scattered, and brought to nought. obeyed: or, believed

View commentary
Gamaliel cites historical precedent—Theudas's failed rebellion. His argument follows a pattern: false movements collapse without divine support. While Gamaliel's theology is incomplete (suggesting a 'wait and see' approach), his providential reasoning contains truth: God-ordained movements cannot be stopped by human opposition. This principle undergirds Christian confidence in the church's eventual triumph despite persecution.

After this man rose up Judas of Galilee in the days of the taxing, and drew away much people after him: he also perished; and all, even as many as obeyed him, were dispersed. obeyed: or, believed

View commentary
Judas of Galilee led another failed revolt, reinforcing Gamaliel's pattern of doomed human movements. The phrase 'perished' and 'scattered' emphasizes the futility of opposing God's purposes through mere human strength. Gamaliel's examples aim to calm the Sanhedrin's violent intentions, showing how God can use even incomplete theological reasoning to protect His people and advance His kingdom.

And now I say unto you, Refrain from these men, and let them alone: for if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought:

View commentary
Gamaliel's famous counsel—'Refrain from these men, and let them alone'—expresses confidence that false movements self-destruct. His conditional reasoning ('if this counsel or this work be of men, it will come to nought') proves prophetically true for the church's survival. Though Gamaliel likely remained unconvinced, his prudential advice allowed Christianity to grow under divine protection, demonstrating God's sovereignty over even unbelieving authorities.

But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God.

View commentary
Gamaliel's warning climaxes with the sobering possibility of fighting 'against God' (Greek: theomachoi). This phrase captures the futility and danger of opposing divine purposes. While Gamaliel spoke better than he knew, his logic is sound: human power cannot overthrow what God establishes. This principle comforts persecuted believers—our vindication is certain because God's purposes cannot fail. No weapon formed against God's work shall prosper.

And to him they agreed: and when they had called the apostles, and beaten them, they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go.

View commentary
The council's agreement with Gamaliel demonstrates God's providential protection of the apostles through human wisdom. Yet their beating the apostles shows partial obedience—they refrained from killing but still punished. This reveals the contradiction of trying to oppose God's work while claiming prudence. The prohibition against speaking in Jesus' name attempts to silence gospel proclamation, showing Satan's consistent strategy: prevent the preaching of Christ's name.

And they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his name.

View commentary
The apostles' rejoicing after suffering represents a radical reversal of natural human response, showing Spirit-produced joy transcending circumstances. Being 'counted worthy to suffer shame for his name' reframes persecution as honor and privilege. This paradoxical joy demonstrates Christianity's transformative power.

And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.

View commentary
Daily, tireless witness 'in the temple, and in every house' shows the early church's aggressive evangelism utilizing all available venues. The dual message of 'teaching and preaching Jesus Christ' combines instruction for believers and proclamation for unbelievers. Their refusal to 'cease' despite opposition demonstrates commitment unto death.

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study