King James Version
Luke 24
53 verses with commentary
The Resurrection
Now upon the first day of the week, very early in the morning , they came unto the sepulchre, bringing the spices which they had prepared, and certain others with them.
View commentary
And they found the stone rolled away from the sepulchre.
View commentary
And they entered in, and found not the body of the Lord Jesus.
View commentary
And it came to pass, as they were much perplexed thereabout , behold, two men stood by them in shining garments:
View commentary
The number two establishes legal testimony (Deuteronomy 19:15)—resurrection truth comes with double witness. Luke's restraint in calling them "men" rather than immediately identifying them as angels reflects the women's initial perception, though verse 23 clarifies they were angels. Their shining garments (astraptousē, ἀστραπτούσῃ, "flashing like lightning") echo the Transfiguration (Luke 9:29) and anticipate Christ's return (Luke 17:24), connecting resurrection to divine glory.
This angelic appearance transforms confusion into revelation. The empty tomb alone might perplex, but divine messengers will explain it (verses 5-7). God graciously meets seeking hearts with understanding, never leaving His people in bewilderment about saving truth.
And as they were afraid, and bowed down their faces to the earth, they said unto them, Why seek ye the living among the dead? the living: or, him that liveth
View commentary
He is not here, but is risen: remember how he spake unto you when he was yet in Galilee,
View commentary
Saying, The Son of man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again.
View commentary
And they remembered his words,
View commentary
His words (tōn rhēmatōn autou, τῶν ῥημάτων αὐτοῦ) refers specifically to Jesus' passion predictions. The women had heard these prophecies but failed to comprehend them—the disciples consistently misunderstood Jesus' suffering predictions (Luke 9:45, 18:34). Now, standing in the empty tomb with angels explaining, Scripture and reality converged in their minds. Resurrection made Jesus' words suddenly comprehensible.
This verse demonstrates how divine illumination unlocks Scripture's meaning. The same words that previously confused now brought clarity. The pattern repeats throughout Luke 24: remembered words (v. 8), opened Scriptures (v. 32, 45), recognition (v. 31). Faith requires both objective revelation (God's Word) and subjective illumination (the Spirit's work). The women's remembering shows that God's truth, once deposited in hearts through hearing, can be activated by the Holy Spirit at the appointed time.
And returned from the sepulchre, and told all these things unto the eleven, and to all the rest.
View commentary
The audience specified is significant: the eleven (tois hendeka, τοῖς ἕνδεκα)—the apostolic circle minus Judas—and to all the rest (pasin tois loipois, πᾶσιν τοῖς λοιποῖς), referring to the broader disciple community. Luke emphasizes the comprehensive nature of this first gospel proclamation: everyone needed to hear. These women became the first resurrection witnesses, the first evangelists of Christianity's central truth.
Their role defied cultural expectations. In first-century Judaism, women's testimony was often dismissed in legal settings. Yet God chose women as first witnesses to history's most important event, demonstrating the gospel's radical reordering of social hierarchies. The pattern established here—experience Christ, tell others—becomes the blueprint for Christian witness across all ages.
It was Mary Magdalene, and Joanna, and Mary the mother of James, and other women that were with them, which told these things unto the apostles.
View commentary
Joanna (Iōanna, Ἰωάννα) was wife of Chuza, Herod's steward (Luke 8:3)—a woman of means who supported Jesus' ministry financially. Her inclusion shows the gospel's reach across social classes. Mary the mother of James (Maria hē Iakōbou, Μαρία ἡ Ἰακώβου), likely "the other Mary" mentioned in Matthew 28:1, may be the wife of Clopas (John 19:25). The phrase and other women that were with them (kai hai loipai syn autais, καὶ αἱ λοιπαὶ σὺν αὐταῖς) indicates a larger group of female disciples, though Luke spotlights these three leaders.
These women's faithfulness contrasts with the male disciples' absence. While Peter and John would eventually visit the tomb (verse 12, John 20:3-10), the women arrived first, demonstrating superior devotion and courage. Their reward was becoming apostles to the apostles—bringing resurrection news to those who would later preach it worldwide.
And their words seemed to them as idle tales, and they believed them not.
View commentary
The stark statement and they believed them not (kai ēpistoun autais, καὶ ἠπίστουν αὐταῖς) uses the imperfect tense for ongoing disbelief. Despite Jesus' multiple passion predictions, despite the women's consistent testimony, despite multiple witnesses, the apostles refused to believe. Their skepticism wasn't noble caution but culpable unbelief—Jesus had told them this would happen (Luke 9:22, 18:31-33), yet they dismissed clear evidence.
This verse actually strengthens the resurrection's credibility. Had disciples fabricated the story, they wouldn't record their own foolish unbelief or the women's superior faithfulness. The historical honesty is striking. More importantly, it shows that resurrection faith doesn't come naturally—it requires divine revelation and Spirit-given illumination. Even proximity to Jesus, hearing His predictions, and receiving eyewitness testimony proved insufficient without God opening minds to believe (verse 45).
Then arose Peter, and ran unto the sepulchre; and stooping down, he beheld the linen clothes laid by themselves, and departed, wondering in himself at that which was come to pass.
View commentary
What Peter beheld (blepei, βλέπει, present tense creating vividness) was the linen clothes laid by themselves (ta othonia mona, τὰ ὀθόνια μόνα). The grave clothes lying undisturbed—not unwrapped and scattered as if grave robbers had stolen the body—suggested something extraordinary. John's account adds that the head cloth was "wrapped together in a place by itself" (John 20:7), implying the body had passed through the cloths, leaving them collapsed but positioned. This detail argues against theft—thieves wouldn't carefully arrange burial cloths.
Peter departed, wondering in himself (apēlthen pros hauton thaumazōn, ἀπῆλθεν πρὸς ἑαυτὸν θαυμάζων). The verb thaumazō (θαυμάζων) means to marvel, be amazed—not yet belief but astonishment. The phrase "in himself" (pros hauton, πρὸς ἑαυτόν) suggests internal dialogue, processing what he'd seen. Peter stood between unbelief and faith, evidence and understanding, confusion and clarity.
On the Road to Emmaus
And, behold, two of them went that same day to a village called Emmaus, which was from Jerusalem about threescore furlongs.
View commentary
And they talked together of all these things which had happened.
View commentary
The subject of discussion was all these things which had happened (peri pantōn tōn symbebēkotōn toutōn, περὶ πάντων τῶν συμβεβηκότων τούτων)—the crucifixion, empty tomb reports, angelic appearances, confusion and disappointment. The perfect participle "which had happened" (symbebēkotōn, συμβεβηκότων) emphasizes these were completed events whose effects continued—the cross's trauma still weighed on them.
Their conversation reveals how disciples processed catastrophic disappointment. They had hoped Jesus would redeem Israel (verse 21) but witnessed His execution instead. Now came confusing reports of an empty tomb. Rather than withdrawing into silence, they talked, reasoned, sought understanding. God would meet them in their confusion, joining their conversation (verse 15) and transforming their despair into joy through Scripture explanation (verses 25-27, 32).
And it came to pass, that, while they communed together and reasoned, Jesus himself drew near, and went with them.
View commentary
The statement Jesus himself drew near (autos Iēsous eggisas, αὐτὸς Ἰησοῦς ἐγγίσας) emphasizes Christ's personal initiative—the emphatic pronoun "himself" (autos, αὐτὸς) stresses it was truly Jesus, the risen Lord. The verb "drew near" (eggizō, ἐγγίζω) indicates He approached and joined them, unrecognized. He then went with them (syneporeueto autois, συνεπορεύετο αὐτοῖς), the compound verb suggesting He walked alongside, companioning them on their journey.
This models how Christ meets seekers. He joins our conversations, enters our confusion, walks alongside in our journey. Before revealing Himself, He'll open Scripture (verses 25-27), warm hearts (verse 32), then make Himself known (verse 31). The pattern shows that Christ revelation comes progressively: presence before recognition, Scripture before sight, understanding before full revelation.
But their eyes were holden that they should not know him.
View commentary
The verb "know" here is epiginōskō (ἐπιγινώσκω), meaning to fully recognize, acknowledge, understand—not mere intellectual knowledge but experiential recognition. Why would God prevent this? To teach a crucial lesson: Scripture understanding must precede Christ recognition. Jesus would first expound Moses and the Prophets (verse 27), warming their hearts through God's Word (verse 32), before opening their eyes to recognize Him (verse 31).
This pattern has profound implications. Genuine knowledge of Christ comes through Scripture, not mystical experience alone. The Word illuminates who Jesus is before we can rightly recognize Him. Modern believers similarly need Scripture-grounded understanding of Christ, not merely emotional encounters detached from biblical revelation. God's temporary withholding served their ultimate good—deeper, Scripture-rooted faith.
And he said unto them, What manner of communications are these that ye have one to another, as ye walk, and are sad?
View commentary
The description as ye walk, and are sad (peripatountes kai este skythrōpoi, περιπατοῦντες καὶ ἐστὲ σκυθρωποί) captures their emotional state. The adjective skythrōpos (σκυθρωπός) means gloomy, downcast, with sad countenance—their grief was visible in their faces and demeanor. The present tense verbs create vivid immediacy: even as they walk, they are sad.
Jesus' question demonstrates pastoral wisdom. Before teaching, He draws out their pain, lets them voice confusion and disappointment. He doesn't immediately correct but first listens, creating space for them to express their crushed hopes (verses 19-24). This models how Christ meets people—entering their grief, hearing their stories, addressing their actual questions before providing answers. The Great Physician diagnoses before prescribing, ensuring His teaching addresses real wounds, not imagined ones.
And the one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answering said unto him, Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem, and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these days?
View commentary
Cleopas's response drips with incredulity: Art thou only a stranger in Jerusalem (sy monos paroikeis Ierousalēm, σὺ μόνος παροικεῖς Ἰερουσαλὴμ)—literally "Are you the only visitor to Jerusalem?" The verb paroikeō (παροικέω) means to dwell as a foreigner, reside temporarily. His question implies everyone in Jerusalem knew about Jesus' crucifixion—it was the talk of the city. How could this stranger be ignorant of events that consumed public attention?
The phrase and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these days (kai ouk egnōs ta genomena en autē en tais hēmerais tautais, καὶ οὐκ ἔγνως τὰ γενόμενα ἐν αὐτῇ ἐν ταῖς ἡμέραις ταύταις) emphasizes recent events' magnitude. Cleopas assumes no informed person could be unaware. The irony is profound: he explains Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection to Jesus Himself. This sets up Christ's rebuke (verse 25) and Scripture exposition (verses 25-27).
And he said unto them, What things? And they said unto him, Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people:
View commentary
Yet their description stops catastrophically short: they saw Him as before God and all the people but not as God incarnate. This incomplete understanding—prophet but not Messiah, mighty but not divine—explains their despair. Jesus would soon correct this deficiency by opening the Scriptures (v. 27), showing how the Christ must suffer before entering glory.
And how the chief priests and our rulers delivered him to be condemned to death, and have crucified him.
View commentary
Our rulers (οἱ ἄρχοντες ἡμῶν, hoi archontes hēmōn) indicts the Sanhedrin leadership, yet the possessive 'our' reveals the disciples' continuing Jewish identity and communal grief. They witnessed their own religious establishment—those expected to recognize Messiah—orchestrate His execution. The passive construction to be condemned acknowledges Roman complicity while emphasizing Jewish initiative, fulfilling Jesus' prediction (18:31-33).
But we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel: and beside all this, to day is the third day since these things were done.
View commentary
Yea, and certain women also of our company made us astonished, which were early at the sepulchre;
View commentary
The phrase of our company (ἐξ ἡμῶν, ex hēmōn) acknowledges these women as full members of Jesus' disciple community—Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James (24:10). Yet the men's response was skeptical dismissal (v. 11: 'idle tales'). The women's testimony, though legally inadmissible in first-century courts, became the resurrection's first proclamation.
And when they found not his body, they came, saying, that they had also seen a vision of angels, which said that he was alive.
View commentary
A vision of angels, which said that he was alive (ὀπτασίαν ἀγγέλων... λέγουσιν αὐτὸν ζῆν, optasian angelōn... legousin auton zēn)—The term optasia (vision/appearance) describes supernatural revelation, not hallucination. The angels' proclamation uses the present infinitive zēn (to be living), emphasizing ongoing life. Yet notice the disciples' secondhand reporting: 'they came, saying'—they hadn't personally encountered the risen Christ yet, creating incomplete conviction.
And certain of them which were with us went to the sepulchre, and found it even so as the women had said: but him they saw not.
View commentary
Yet the tragic conclusion remains: but him they saw not (αὐτὸν δὲ οὐκ εἶδον, auton de ouk eidon). Evidence without encounter left them theologically informed but spiritually unchanged. John 'believed' something at the tomb (John 20:8), but the disciples still didn't comprehend Scripture's necessity for resurrection (John 20:9). This verse captures resurrection faith's progression: testimony → investigation → evidence → encounter → understanding.
Then he said unto them, O fools, and slow of heart to believe all that the prophets have spoken:
View commentary
Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into his glory?
View commentary
"To have suffered" (pathein, παθεῖν) encompasses the full scope of Christ's passion: betrayal, mockery, scourging, crucifixion, and death. The definite article "these things" (tauta, ταῦτα) refers to the specific sufferings just discussed—pointing to the detailed Old Testament prophecies the disciples should have recognized. The phrase "to enter into his glory" (eiselthein eis tēn doxan autou, εἰσελθεῖν εἰς τὴν δόξαν αὐτοῦ) reveals that suffering was the divinely appointed pathway to exaltation.
This verse establishes the pattern of biblical theology: suffering precedes glory, cross before crown, death before resurrection. Jesus corrects the disciples' mistaken expectation of a conquering Messiah who would bypass suffering. The resurrection demonstrates that God's plan was not thwarted but perfectly fulfilled through apparent defeat.
And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, he expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning himself.
View commentary
And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and he made as though he would have gone further.
View commentary
This mirrors His consistent pattern: Jesus stands at the door and knocks (Revelation 3:20), but enters only when welcomed. The testing wasn't deception but gracious restraint, allowing the disciples freedom to choose. Their recognition came through hospitality and table fellowship—they constrained him (v. 29), using parabiazomai (to urge strongly), demonstrating genuine desire for His company before knowing His identity.
But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them.
View commentary
Their reason—for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent (ὅτι πρὸς ἑσπέραν ἐστὶν καὶ κέκλικεν ἤδη ἡ ἡμέρα, hoti pros hesperan estin kai kekliken ēdē hē hēmera)—carries symbolic weight. The day 'declining' (κέκλικεν, kekliken, perfect tense: 'has declined') mirrors their spiritual darkness post-crucifixion. Yet Christ's presence transforms evening into revelation. Their hospitality to a stranger became the context for recognizing the Lord.
And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them.
View commentary
And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight. vanished: or, ceased to be seen of them
View commentary
And they said one to another , Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?
View commentary
And they rose up the same hour, and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven gathered together, and them that were with them,
View commentary
And found the eleven gathered together (εὗρον ἠθροισμένους τοὺς ἕνδεκα, heuron ēthroismenos tous hendeka)—The 'eleven' (Judas dead, Thomas absent per John 20:24) were gathered in fearful hiding (John 20:19), yet united. The perfect participle ēthroismenos (having been gathered) suggests they'd been together for hours, processing reports. The Emmaus disciples arrived to announce their encounter, only to hear The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon (v. 34)—their testimony confirmed before they spoke.
Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon.
View commentary
And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread.
View commentary
How he was known of them in breaking of bread (ὡς ἐγνώσθη αὐτοῖς ἐν τῇ κλάσει τοῦ ἄρτου, hōs egnōsthē autois en tē klasei tou artou)—The passive voice egnōsthē (was made known) indicates Jesus revealed Himself; they didn't discover Him. Breaking of bread (κλάσει τοῦ ἄρτου, klasei tou artou) becomes technical terminology for the Lord's Supper (Acts 2:42). Christ is known through Word (v. 27) and Table—the dual rhythm of Christian worship.
Jesus Appears to His Disciples
And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.
View commentary
But they were terrified and affrighted , and supposed that they had seen a spirit.
View commentary
This verse is critical for resurrection apologetics. The disciples did not expect Jesus to rise bodily—they thought they saw an apparition. This undermines theories that they hallucinated or fabricated resurrection stories. Their terror demonstrates they were convinced of Jesus' death and shocked by His physical appearance. The subsequent verses (38-43) show Jesus systematically proving His bodily resurrection by showing wounds, inviting touch, and eating food—things spirits cannot do.
The Greek edokoun (ἐδόκουν, "supposed" or "thought") emphasizes their initial misinterpretation. Jesus will correct this misunderstanding, establishing that resurrection is not spiritual immortality but physical restoration of the body—a truth foundational to Christian eschatology (1 Corinthians 15:42-44, Philippians 3:21).
And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?
View commentary
Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
View commentary
And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet.
View commentary
This physical evidence refutes several heresies. Against Docetism (the claim Jesus only seemed human), the wounds prove His real incarnation and suffering. Against spiritualized resurrection theories, the scars demonstrate bodily continuity—this is the same Jesus, physically restored, not a replacement or vision. The marks also hold theological significance: Christ's wounds are eternal reminders of atonement. Even in His glorified state, He bears the evidence of redemptive suffering (Revelation 5:6 describes the Lamb "as it had been slain").
John's Gospel adds that Jesus invited Thomas to touch the wounds (John 20:27), emphasizing empirical verification. Luke stresses visual evidence—tas cheiras kai tous podas (τὰς χεῖρας καὶ τοὺς πόδας, "the hands and the feet") were shown as irrefutable proof. Resurrection faith is grounded in historical, physical evidence, not mystical experience or wishful thinking.
And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?
View commentary
And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb .
View commentary
The offering of food serves Jesus' apologetic purpose. Ancient Jews and Greeks believed spirits could appear but not eat physical food (Tobit 12:19, where the angel Raphael explains he only seemed to eat). By requesting and consuming food, Jesus proved His resurrection was bodily, not merely spiritual. The Greek epedōkan (ἐπέδωκαν, "they gave") indicates the disciples' response to His request (v. 41: "Have ye here any meat?")—they cooperated in His demonstration.
Fish holds special significance in Luke's Gospel and early Christianity. Jesus called fishermen as disciples (5:1-11), multiplied fish to feed thousands (9:10-17), and ate fish with disciples post-resurrection (John 21:9-13). The Greek word ichthys (ἰχθύς) became an early Christian acronym: Iēsous Christos Theou Yios Sōtēr (Jesus Christ, God's Son, Savior). This meal demonstrated resurrection reality and foreshadowed the church's mission.
And he took it, and did eat before them.
View commentary
This verse demolishes several objections. First, it refutes the 'vision theory'—hallucinations don't eat. Second, it negates 'spiritual resurrection' interpretations—spirits don't consume food. Third, it confirms identity—this is the same Jesus who ate with them for three years, now proven alive. The act of eating demonstrates that resurrection bodies are physical, functional, and continuous with pre-death bodies, though glorified (1 Corinthians 15:42-44).
Theologically, Jesus' eating affirms the goodness of material creation and the body's redemption. Gnosticism and Platonism viewed matter as inferior or evil; resurrection teaches God will redeem the physical cosmos (Romans 8:19-23). Christ's resurrection body is the firstfruits (1 Corinthians 15:20, 23)—the prototype and guarantee of believers' future resurrection. We will not be disembodied spirits but will receive glorified bodies capable of physical activity, including eating at the Messianic banquet (Luke 14:15, Revelation 19:9).
Jesus Opens the Scriptures
And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me.
View commentary
Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,
View commentary
And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day:
View commentary
And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
View commentary
And ye are witnesses of these things.
View commentary
And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high.
View commentary
The Ascension
And he led them out as far as to Bethany, and he lifted up his hands, and blessed them.
View commentary
And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into heaven.
View commentary
The phrase eis ton ouranon (εἰς τὸν οὐρανόν, "into heaven") indicates Christ's return to the Father's presence to assume His throne (Psalm 110:1, Philippians 2:9-11, Hebrews 1:3). The ascension completes Christ's redemptive work: incarnation, crucifixion, resurrection, ascension, session at God's right hand, and future return. Without ascension, Christ's work remains incomplete—He must enter heaven as forerunner (Hebrews 6:19-20), intercede for believers (Romans 8:34, Hebrews 7:25), and send the Spirit (John 16:7, Acts 2:33).
Luke uniquely ends his Gospel with the ascension and begins Acts with expanded detail (Acts 1:9-11). This literary structure emphasizes continuity—the Gospel proclaims what Jesus 'began to do and teach' (Acts 1:1), while Acts records His continued work through the Spirit-empowered church. Christ's ascension is not absence but omnipresence—He is no longer limited to one geographic location but reigns universally and indwells all believers (Matthew 28:20, Ephesians 1:20-23).
And they worshipped him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy:
View commentary
And were continually in the temple, praising and blessing God. Amen.