King James Version

1 Samuel 2

36 verses with commentary

Hannah's Prayer of Thanksgiving

And Hannah prayed, and said, My heart rejoiceth in the LORD, mine horn is exalted in the LORD: my mouth is enlarged over mine enemies; because I rejoice in thy salvation.

View commentary

Hannah's prayer inaugurates one of Scripture's most significant prophetic poems. Her 'heart' (lev) rejoicing shows internal transformation, while her 'horn' (qeren) being exalted pictures strength restored - the horn symbolizing power as in a strong bull. The phrase 'mouth is enlarged' over enemies indicates confident speech replacing shameful silence. The Hebrew yeshu'ah (salvation) introduces a theme that echoes through Scripture to Jesus (Yeshua) Himself. Hannah's personal deliverance becomes a lens for understanding cosmic redemption. Her song anticipates Mary's Magnificat (Luke 1:46-55) in remarkable parallel.

There is none holy as the LORD: for there is none beside thee: neither is there any rock like our God.

View commentary

Hannah's declaration of God's uniqueness stands at the heart of Hebrew monotheism. The triple assertion - 'none holy,' 'none beside thee,' 'no rock' - emphasizes divine incomparability from multiple angles. The term 'holy' (qadosh) means set apart, transcendently other. 'Rock' (tsur) pictures stability, refuge, and reliable foundation. Hannah's theology is thoroughly God-centered - human circumstances change because of who God is, not because of human manipulation. This verse provides the theological foundation for everything that follows in her song.

Talk no more so exceeding proudly; let not arrogancy come out of your mouth: for the LORD is a God of knowledge, and by him actions are weighed. arrogancy: Heb. hard

View commentary

Hannah's warning against pride directly addresses those like Peninnah who trusted in human advantages. The phrase 'exceeding proudly' intensifies the prohibition. The theological basis is God's omniscience - He is 'a God of knowledge' (or 'God of knowledges,' plural of majesty). The statement 'by him actions are weighed' pictures divine scales measuring every deed. Human boasting reveals ignorance of the God who sees all, knows all, and will judge all. Pride before the omniscient God is not merely inappropriate but absurd.

The bows of the mighty men are broken, and they that stumbled are girded with strength.

View commentary

Hannah now applies her theology to concrete reversals of fortune. The 'bows of the mighty' represent military power and self-sufficient strength. Their breaking demonstrates God's ability to disarm the powerful. Conversely, those who 'stumbled' (the weak and failing) receive strength like a warrior's belt. This reversal pattern permeates Scripture and finds ultimate expression in the cross, where apparent defeat becomes cosmic victory. God consistently works contrary to human expectations, exalting the humble and humbling the proud.

They that were full have hired out themselves for bread; and they that were hungry ceased: so that the barren hath born seven; and she that hath many children is waxed feeble.

View commentary

The economic reversals continue Hannah's theme. Those once satiated must hire themselves out for bread (the most basic sustenance), while the hungry need work no more. Hannah's personal experience of reversal (barren to blessed) grounds her prophetic vision. The number 'seven' represents completeness - the barren woman bears the full blessing of children while the prolific mother fades. Hannah herself would bear five more children (verse 21), making six total. Yet Samuel, as dedicated firstborn, accomplishes what many sons could not.

The LORD killeth, and maketh alive: he bringeth down to the grave, and bringeth up.

View commentary

Hannah's theology reaches cosmic proportions. God's sovereignty extends to life and death, the grave (Sheol) and resurrection. The parallelism 'killeth/maketh alive' and 'bringeth down/bringeth up' affirms total divine control over human destiny. This early statement of resurrection hope is remarkable, anticipating fuller revelation. Hannah proclaims not merely that God permits death but that He actively governs it for His purposes. Such absolute sovereignty provides comfort when facing mortality and hope when confronting death.

The LORD maketh poor, and maketh rich: he bringeth low, and lifteth up.

View commentary

Economic reversals extend God's sovereignty to material prosperity. The LORD 'maketh poor' and 'maketh rich' - human wealth comes not from personal achievement but divine distribution. Similarly, He 'bringeth low' and 'lifteth up' in social status. This theology challenges prosperity gospel distortions that promise wealth to the faithful while explaining poverty as lack of faith. Hannah knows both poverty of soul (barrenness) and richness of blessing (Samuel). Both conditions come from God's sovereign hand working for purposes beyond human comprehension.

He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the LORD'S, and he hath set the world upon them.

View commentary

This verse presents the most dramatic social reversal: the poor raised from dust and dunghill (ash heap) to sit with princes and inherit glory. The imagery is deliberately extreme - from the garbage heap to the royal throne. The theological foundation appears in the final clause: 'the pillars of the earth are the LORD'S, and he hath set the world upon them.' Creation itself depends on God; therefore, all social structures rest on His will. His right to reorganize human hierarchies flows from His role as Creator and Sustainer of all things.

He will keep the feet of his saints, and the wicked shall be silent in darkness; for by strength shall no man prevail.

View commentary

Hannah's prophetic vision turns to God's protective care for His own. 'Keeping the feet' of saints implies guiding their path and preventing stumbling. The Hebrew chasidim (saints, faithful ones) describes those in covenant relationship with God. In contrast, the wicked shall be 'silent in darkness' - silenced in judgment and condemned to the shadowy realm of death. The crucial statement 'by strength shall no man prevail' returns to Hannah's core theme: human power cannot ultimately succeed against divine purposes. Victory belongs to God alone.

The adversaries of the LORD shall be broken to pieces; out of heaven shall he thunder upon them: the LORD shall judge the ends of the earth; and he shall give strength unto his king, and exalt the horn of his anointed.

View commentary

The climax of Hannah's song introduces stunning prophetic revelation. God's adversaries will be shattered and judged with cosmic thunder. But the astonishing elements are the final lines: God will give strength to 'his king' and exalt the 'horn of his anointed' (meshiach, messiah). Israel has no king when Hannah sings; the monarchy will begin through her own son Samuel! Hannah prophesies the Davidic kingdom before its existence and, beyond David, the Messiah whose horn (power, authority) God will exalt eternally. Personal testimony has become messianic prophecy.

And Elkanah went to Ramah to his house. And the child did minister unto the LORD before Eli the priest.

View commentary

The narrative transitions from Hannah's exalted worship to the mundane reality of returning home. Yet this brief verse contains profound contrast. Elkanah returns to Ramah (normal life), but Samuel remains to 'minister unto the LORD before Eli.' The Hebrew sharat (to serve, minister) indicates formal religious service. The young child begins his life of service even as Hannah's song still echoes. Her prophetic vision of kings and messiahs finds practical expression in one small boy serving at an altar in Shiloh.

Eli's Wicked Sons

Now the sons of Eli were sons of Belial; they knew not the LORD.

View commentary

The narrator's characterization of Eli's sons is devastating: 'sons of Belial' indicates complete worthlessness and wickedness. More shocking: 'they knew not the LORD.' These are priests, officiating at Israel's central sanctuary, yet they have no personal relationship with the God they supposedly serve. The Hebrew yada' (to know) implies intimate, experiential knowledge - they performed religious duties without genuine faith. Institutional position provides no substitute for personal covenant relationship. Many who serve in religious roles may be equally devoid of true spiritual knowledge.

And the priests' custom with the people was, that, when any man offered sacrifice, the priest's servant came, while the flesh was in seething, with a fleshhook of three teeth in his hand;

View commentary

The detailed description of priestly corruption begins. The 'custom' (mishpat, which can mean either practice or judgment) of these priests perverted proper sacrificial procedure. The three-pronged fork used to select meat portions was meant to take what God had designated for priests. Instead, it became a tool for random seizure. The boiling pot - intended for the worshipers' communion meal - became the priests' personal buffet. What should have been orderly worship became chaotic exploitation of those who came to honor God.

And he struck it into the pan, or kettle, or caldron, or pot; all that the fleshhook brought up the priest took for himself. So they did in Shiloh unto all the Israelites that came thither.

View commentary

The corruption spreads from the priests' portion to the people's share. Whatever the fork brought up, 'the priest took for himself.' This violated multiple laws: taking more than priestly due, interrupting the worshiper's communion meal, and showing contempt for sacred procedures. The phrase 'So they did in Shiloh unto all the Israelites' indicates systematic, widespread abuse. Every worshiper who came to the central sanctuary encountered this corruption. Religious leaders who exploit worshipers destroy not only individual faith but national spiritual life.

Also before they burnt the fat, the priest's servant came, and said to the man that sacrificed, Give flesh to roast for the priest; for he will not have sodden flesh of thee, but raw.

View commentary

The abuse escalates further. Not content with boiled meat, the priests demanded raw flesh for roasting before the fat was burned to God. Levitical law required burning the fat first (Leviticus 3:3-5) as the LORD's portion - the 'food of God' (Leviticus 3:11). By seizing meat before this sacred offering, the priests literally took what belonged to God Himself. They prioritized their culinary preferences ('he will not have sodden flesh...but raw') over divine commands. Their appetites trumped obedience; their comfort superseded God's explicit instructions.

And if any man said unto him, Let them not fail to burn the fat presently, and then take as much as thy soul desireth; then he would answer him, Nay; but thou shalt give it me now: and if not, I will take it by force. presently: Heb. as on the day

View commentary

The confrontation between worshiper and corrupt priest reveals the depths of priestly arrogance. The worshiper reasonably requests proper order - burn God's portion first, then take what you want. This offered the priest even more than his due, demonstrating accommodation. But the response is threatening: 'Nay; but thou shalt give it me now: and if not, I will take it by force.' The Hebrew chazaq (strength, force) indicates violent seizure. Worship meant to express gratitude becomes occasion for robbery. Those who resist corruption face coercion.

Wherefore the sin of the young men was very great before the LORD: for men abhorred the offering of the LORD.

View commentary

The narrator's assessment is comprehensive: 'the sin of the young men was very great before the LORD.' Great in scope (affecting all worshipers), great in nature (profaning sacred things), and great in consequence (causing others to despise worship). The phrase 'men abhorred the offering of the LORD' indicates the most serious result - corrupted leadership drove people away from God. When those representing God act wickedly, seekers conclude that God Himself must be unworthy. The priests' sin multiplied through every discouraged worshiper who left Shiloh disillusioned.

But Samuel ministered before the LORD, being a child, girded with a linen ephod.

View commentary

The narrative deliberately juxtaposes the corruption of Eli's sons with Samuel's faithful service. 'But Samuel ministered before the LORD' presents sharp contrast. His 'linen ephod' - a priestly garment - indicates legitimate service even as a child. Where Hophni and Phinehas profaned their office, Samuel honored his. Where they exploited worshipers, he served the LORD. The word 'child' (na'ar) emphasizes his youth, making the contrast more striking. God is already preparing His replacement for the failed priesthood even while judgment approaches.

Moreover his mother made him a little coat, and brought it to him from year to year, when she came up with her husband to offer the yearly sacrifice.

View commentary

Hannah's yearly gift of a little coat (me'il, a sleeveless robe) demonstrates enduring maternal love within her vow of dedication. The me'il later becomes a significant garment - Samuel will wear a distinctive robe as prophet, and its tearing will symbolize the tearing of Saul's kingdom (15:27-28). Hannah's simple act of making and bringing this garment shows that dedication to God does not eliminate natural affection but sanctifies it. Her annual visits maintained connection while honoring her commitment. Godly parenting balances release with ongoing care.

And Eli blessed Elkanah and his wife, and said, The LORD give thee seed of this woman for the loan which is lent to the LORD. And they went unto their own home. loan: or, petition which she asked, etc

View commentary

Eli's blessing on Elkanah and Hannah invokes divine compensation for their sacrifice. The phrase 'for the loan which is lent to the LORD' uses sha'al language from chapter 1, acknowledging Hannah's extraordinary dedication. Eli blesses them with more children - the one dedicated will be replaced many times over. The blessing formula 'The LORD give thee seed' invokes creation language, asking God to multiply their offspring. Though Eli fails with his own sons, he still functions as priest, channeling blessing to faithful worshipers.

And the LORD visited Hannah, so that she conceived, and bare three sons and two daughters. And the child Samuel grew before the LORD.

View commentary

The LORD's 'visiting' (paqad) Hannah indicates purposeful divine attention bringing blessing. This verb previously described God remembering Hannah (1:19) and now marks repeated blessing. Hannah bears three more sons and two daughters - five additional children beyond Samuel. Her womb, once closed, now produces abundantly. Meanwhile, Samuel 'grew before the LORD,' physically maturing while spiritually developing in God's presence. The parallel tracks of Hannah's fruitfulness and Samuel's growth demonstrate how God rewards faithfulness while preparing His servants.

Now Eli was very old, and heard all that his sons did unto all Israel; and how they lay with the women that assembled at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. assembled: Heb. assembled by troops

View commentary

Eli's advanced age coincides with full awareness of his sons' wickedness. He 'heard all that his sons did' - not rumors but confirmed reports of their comprehensive corruption. Their sin extends beyond sanctuary abuse to sexual exploitation: 'they lay with the women that assembled at the door of the tabernacle.' These women may have been worship attendants (Exodus 38:8) or simply faithful worshipers. Either way, the priests corrupted the most sacred space for the basest purposes. Eli knows but takes inadequate action.

And he said unto them, Why do ye such things? for I hear of your evil dealings by all this people. of your: or, evil words of you

View commentary

Eli's rebuke to his sons appears reasonable but proves ineffective. His question 'Why do ye such things?' seeks explanation rather than demanding cessation. The phrase 'I hear of your evil dealings by all this people' shows concern for reputation rather than holiness. Eli addresses their behavior's impact on public perception, not its offense against God. His approach is pastoral rather than prophetic, remedial rather than decisive. Sometimes situations require not discussion but decisive discipline - a lesson Eli never learns.

Nay, my sons; for it is no good report that I hear: ye make the LORD'S people to transgress. transgress: or, cry out

View commentary

Eli's continued appeal shows concern but inadequate response. His statement 'it is no good report that I hear' focuses on what people are saying. The phrase 'ye make the LORD'S people to transgress' identifies a crucial dynamic: corrupt leadership causes followers to sin. The Hebrew ta'avrim (cause to cross over, transgress) makes the priests responsible not only for their own sin but for others' stumbling. Leadership multiplication works both ways - godly leaders multiply righteousness; wicked leaders multiply wickedness.

If one man sin against another, the judge shall judge him: but if a man sin against the LORD, who shall intreat for him? Notwithstanding they hearkened not unto the voice of their father, because the LORD would slay them.

View commentary

Eli's argument reaches its theological apex with a profound question: 'if a man sin against the LORD, who shall intreat for him?' Sins between humans can find human judges and mediators. But sins directly against God leave no higher court of appeal. This rhetorical question answers itself: none can mediate between the sinner and the offended God - except, as the full canon reveals, the promised Mediator, Jesus Christ. Yet the sons 'hearkened not' because 'the LORD would slay them.' Divine judicial hardening confirms their self-chosen path toward destruction.

And the child Samuel grew on, and was in favour both with the LORD, and also with men.

View commentary

Against the dark backdrop of Eli's failing house, Samuel's progress shines. He 'grew on' (literally 'was becoming great and becoming good') in both divine and human estimation. The phrase 'favour both with the LORD, and also with men' precisely parallels Luke's description of Jesus (Luke 2:52). Samuel becomes a type of Christ - growing in wisdom and stature, pleasing God while earning human respect. Where corruption marked the sons of Eli, godliness characterizes the son of Hannah. God's replacement is maturing even as judgment approaches.

Prophecy Against Eli's House

And there came a man of God unto Eli, and said unto him, Thus saith the LORD, Did I plainly appear unto the house of thy father, when they were in Egypt in Pharaoh's house?

View commentary

An anonymous 'man of God' delivers prophetic judgment to Eli. His message begins with historical reminder: God revealed Himself to Eli's ancestors in Egypt, choosing them for priestly service. The rhetorical question expects an affirmative answer - yes, God had plainly appeared to Aaron's house. This historical foundation makes current failure inexcusable. Those with greater privilege bear greater responsibility. Eli's family had generations of divine revelation and sacred service; their corruption therefore warranted severe judgment.

And did I choose him out of all the tribes of Israel to be my priest, to offer upon mine altar, to burn incense, to wear an ephod before me? and did I give unto the house of thy father all the offerings made by fire of the children of Israel?

View commentary

The prophetic indictment continues recounting divine election and provision. God chose Aaron's line from all Israel for priestly service - an extraordinary privilege. The duties listed (offering on altar, burning incense, wearing ephod) represent the full range of priestly ministry. Additionally, God gave the fire offerings as priestly provision. Everything the priestly family enjoyed came from divine choice and provision. Yet they responded to grace with greed, to privilege with presumption. The greater the gift, the greater the offense when it is abused.

Wherefore kick ye at my sacrifice and at mine offering, which I have commanded in my habitation; and honourest thy sons above me, to make yourselves fat with the chiefest of all the offerings of Israel my people?

View commentary

The indictment reaches its core accusation: 'honourest thy sons above me.' Eli's failure was not ignorance but misplaced loyalty. He valued his sons' comfort over God's honor. The verb 'kick' (ba'at) pictures stubborn resistance, like an animal refusing the yoke. The phrase 'to make yourselves fat' indicts both father and sons - Eli shared in the benefits of their corruption. His passive tolerance constituted active participation. The question 'Wherefore?' demands accounting. No acceptable answer exists for prioritizing human relationships over divine commands.

Wherefore the LORD God of Israel saith, I said indeed that thy house, and the house of thy father, should walk before me for ever: but now the LORD saith, Be it far from me; for them that honour me I will honour, and they that despise me shall be lightly esteemed.

View commentary

God's response introduces a crucial principle: 'them that honour me I will honour, and they that despise me shall be lightly esteemed.' The original promise ('thy house...should walk before me for ever') was conditional on faithful obedience. Divine promises do not override human responsibility. The phrase 'Be it far from me' expresses God's revulsion at continuing to bless the disobedient. This verse does not teach that salvation can be lost but that covenant blessings flow through covenant faithfulness. Privilege without obedience leads to forfeiture.

Behold, the days come, that I will cut off thine arm, and the arm of thy father's house, that there shall not be an old man in thine house.

View commentary

The judgment oracle specifies consequences. 'Cutting off the arm' represents removal of strength and ability to serve. No 'old man' in the house means premature death across generations. The devastating phrase 'behold, the days come' introduces prophetic certainty - this is not threat but announcement of determined judgment. Eli's house will experience generational diminishment, watching descendants die young while others prosper. The punishment fits the crime: they abused sacred privilege, so sacred privilege is removed; they shortened others' worship, so their own days are shortened.

And thou shalt see an enemy in my habitation, in all the wealth which God shall give Israel: and there shall not be an old man in thine house for ever. an enemy: or, the affliction of the tabernacle, for all the wealth which God would have given Israel

View commentary

The prophecy extends to sanctuary destruction: 'thou shalt see an enemy in my habitation.' Eli would witness the beginning of Shiloh's downfall - the Ark captured, his sons killed, the sanctuary eventually destroyed. 'In all the wealth which God shall give Israel' indicates that national prosperity would continue but Eli's house would be excluded. They would watch others blessed while they suffered. The enduring nature of the curse ('there shall not be an old man in thine house for ever') emphasizes permanence.

And the man of thine, whom I shall not cut off from mine altar, shall be to consume thine eyes, and to grieve thine heart: and all the increase of thine house shall die in the flower of their age. in the flower: Heb. men

View commentary

One survivor will remain - not for blessing but for 'consuming eyes and grieving heart.' This descendant will live in misery, watching the house's decline while unable to prevent it. The phrase 'all the increase of thine house shall die in the flower of their age' pictures young men cut down before their prime. This surviving witness becomes a perpetual reminder of judgment, living testimony to the consequences of honoring sons above God. Survival without restoration can be worse than death.

And this shall be a sign unto thee, that shall come upon thy two sons, on Hophni and Phinehas; in one day they shall die both of them.

View commentary

A confirming sign seals the prophecy: Hophni and Phinehas will die on the same day. This near-term fulfillment validates the entire prophetic message. When the sign comes true (chapter 4), Eli can know the extended prophecy will also be fulfilled. The doubling of death - both sons together - emphasizes divine judgment rather than coincidence. Signs in prophetic literature serve to authenticate the prophet's message and call the hearers to response. Eli's response will determine his personal standing before God.

And I will raise me up a faithful priest, that shall do according to that which is in mine heart and in my mind: and I will build him a sure house; and he shall walk before mine anointed for ever.

View commentary

Amid judgment comes promise: God will raise 'a faithful priest' who acts according to God's heart and mind. This priest will have a 'sure house' (contrasting Eli's doomed house) and will walk before God's anointed forever. Immediate reference is to Samuel and then to Zadok, whose line served through Solomon's temple. But the ultimate fulfillment is Christ, the faithful High Priest whose house endures eternally. Even in pronouncing judgment, God provides hope. The failed priesthood points to a better priest coming.

And it shall come to pass, that every one that is left in thine house shall come and crouch to him for a piece of silver and a morsel of bread, and shall say, Put me, I pray thee, into one of the priests' offices, that I may eat a piece of bread. Put: Heb. Join one of: or, somewhat about the priesthood

View commentary

The final verse pictures total reversal. Those who once wielded priestly power will beg for the most menial religious positions - just for bread to eat. The phrase 'crouch to him for a piece of silver and a morsel of bread' describes desperate pleading. The former elite become suppliants. Their request to be placed in 'one of the priests' offices' shows desire to cling to any religious role. The complete reversal recalls Hannah's song: the full now beg for bread, the mighty bow low. God's justice perfectly fits punishment to crime.

About 1 Samuel

Places in This Chapter

1 Samuel 2

Hannah's Prayer of Thanksgiving

Eli's Wicked Sons

Prophecy Against Eli's House

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study