King James Version
Luke 19
48 verses with commentary
Jesus and Zacchaeus
And Jesus entered and passed through Jericho.
View commentary
Luke's narrative structure connects this passage to the previous healing of blind Bartimaeus (Luke 18:35-43), who cried out for mercy and received sight. Now another outcast—a chief tax collector—will receive salvation. The pattern reveals Jesus's mission: "The Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost" (Luke 19:10). Both the physically blind beggar and the spiritually blind extortioner experience transforming encounters with Christ on the road through Jericho.
And, behold, there was a man named Zacchaeus, which was the chief among the publicans, and he was rich.
View commentary
The detail "he was rich" (kai autos ēn plousios, καὶ αὐτὸς ἦν πλούσιος) explains how he obtained his wealth: through systematic extortion. Roman taxation was farmed out to the highest bidder, who then extracted as much as possible to profit beyond the required amount. Zacchaeus's riches came from oppressing his own people. Yet Luke presents him as the unlikely recipient of grace, following Jesus's recent teaching that what is impossible with men is possible with God (Luke 18:27)—even a rich man entering God's kingdom.
And he sought to see Jesus who he was; and could not for the press, because he was little of stature.
View commentary
The obstacle was twofold: the crowd (tou ochlou, τοῦ ὄχλου, "the press") and his stature (tē hēlikia mikros ēn, τῇ ἡλικίᾳ μικρὸς ἦν, "he was little of stature"). The word hēlikia (ἡλικία) can mean physical height or age; most interpreters favor height. Zacchaeus faced both physical and social barriers—too short to see over the crowd, too despised for anyone to make room for him. Yet his determination overcame both obstacles, illustrating that those who genuinely seek Christ will not be hindered by circumstantial barriers.
And he ran before, and climbed up into a sycomore tree to see him: for he was to pass that way.
View commentary
The phrase "to see him" (hina idē auton, ἵνα ἴδῃ αὐτόν) expresses purpose—his entire undignified performance had one goal: seeing Jesus. The detail "for he was to pass that way" (hoti ekeinēs ēmellen dierchesthai, ὅτι ἐκείνης ἤμελλεν διέρχεσθαι) shows Zacchaeus's strategic planning. He anticipated Jesus's route and positioned himself accordingly. This combination of desperate urgency (running, climbing) and strategic wisdom (choosing the right tree) illustrates faith that acts decisively while depending on Christ's sovereign movement.
And when Jesus came to the place, he looked up, and saw him, and said unto him, Zacchaeus, make haste, and come down; for to day I must abide at thy house.
View commentary
And he made haste, and came down, and received him joyfully.
View commentary
The crowning detail is chairōn (χαίρων, "joyfully")—literally "rejoicing." This present participle describes ongoing, exuberant joy. Zacchaeus didn't receive Jesus grudgingly or cautiously but with overflowing gladness. This joy echoes the shepherd's joy over the recovered sheep (Luke 15:5), the woman's joy over the found coin (Luke 15:9), and the father's joy over the returned son (Luke 15:32). Genuine encounter with Christ produces transforming joy, not mere religious duty or social propriety. Zacchaeus's joy anticipates his radical life-change (v. 8).
And when they saw it, they all murmured, saying, That he was gone to be guest with a man that is a sinner.
View commentary
The irony is profound: the crowd accurately identifies Zacchaeus as a sinner but fails to recognize their own sinfulness or need for grace. They see Jesus's fellowship with Zacchaeus as contamination rather than transformation. This murmuring echoes Israel's grumbling in the wilderness (Exodus 15:24, 16:2)—rebellion against God's grace masked as concern for righteousness. The same religious spirit that crucified Christ rejects the gospel of grace that welcomes sinners. The crowd's complaint sets up Jesus's climactic declaration: "The Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost" (v. 10).
And Zacchaeus stood, and said unto the Lord; Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I give to the poor; and if I have taken any thing from any man by false accusation, I restore him fourfold.
View commentary
And Jesus said unto him, This day is salvation come to this house, forsomuch as he also is a son of Abraham.
View commentary
For the Son of man is come to seek and to save that which was lost.
View commentary
The verb "is come" (ēlthen, ἦλθεν) is aorist tense, indicating completed action at a specific point in time—the Incarnation. This affirms Jesus' pre-existence; He "came" from somewhere (heaven) to somewhere (earth). The dual purpose uses two infinitives: "to seek" (zētēsai, ζητῆσαι) and "to save" (sōsai, σῶσαι). Zēteō (ζητέω) means to search for, seek diligently, or pursue. God is the active seeker; sinners don't find God—He finds them (Romans 3:11). Sōzō (σῴζω) means to rescue, deliver, heal, or make whole. Salvation encompasses forgiveness, reconciliation, transformation, and eternal life.
The object is "that which was lost" (to apolōlos, τὸ ἀπολωλός)—a perfect participle of apollymi (ἀπόλλυμι) meaning to destroy, perish, or be utterly lost. The perfect tense indicates completed action with ongoing state—humanity is in a condition of lostness, unable to save itself. This summarizes the human condition apart from Christ: spiritually dead (Ephesians 2:1), enslaved to sin (Romans 6:17), separated from God (Isaiah 59:2), and facing judgment (Hebrews 9:27). Jesus came to reverse this condition through His death and resurrection.
The Parable of the Ten Minas
And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear.
View commentary
The disciples and crowd expected Jesus to enter Jerusalem and immediately establish His visible, political kingdom—overthrowing Rome and restoring Israel's sovereignty. The word parachrēma (παραχρῆμα) means "immediately," "instantly." The verb anaphainesthai (ἀναφαίνεσθαι) means "to appear," "to be manifested." They anticipated an instant, apocalyptic revelation of God's kingdom in earthly power and glory. Jesus's parable corrects this misunderstanding, teaching that His kingdom would come through a period of absence, testing, and faithful stewardship before the final consummation.
He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.
View commentary
The parable's nobleman represents Christ, who would ascend to heaven (the "far country") to receive His kingdom from the Father before returning in glory. The journey's length implies a period of absence—contradicting expectations of immediate manifestation. The purpose labein basileian ("to receive a kingdom") emphasizes that even Christ's authority comes by divine appointment, not human revolt. His kingdom is established through heavenly investiture, not earthly insurrection. The phrase "and to return" (kai hypostrepsai, καὶ ὑποστρέψαι) anticipates the Second Coming, when Christ will return to judge and reign.
And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come. pounds: mina, here translated a pound, is twelve ounces and an half: which according to five shillings the ounce is three pounds two shillings and sixpence
View commentary
The command pragmateusasthe (πραγματεύσασθε, "occupy") is better translated "do business" or "trade." It's an imperative demanding active engagement, not passive waiting. The phrase "till I come" (heōs erchomai, ἕως ἔρχομαι) establishes the timeframe: the servants must work during the master's absence until his return. Christ's followers are not to wait idly for His return but to actively invest His resources for kingdom advancement. The parable teaches stewardship, accountability, and the expectation that disciples will be productive during the inter-advent period.
But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.
View commentary
This detail historically parallels the Jewish delegation that followed Archelaus to Rome to oppose his kingship. Prophetically, it represents Israel's rejection of Jesus as Messiah—"We have no king but Caesar" (John 19:15). The citizens' refusal anticipates Jesus's coming rejection in Jerusalem. The phrase "this man" (touton, τοῦτον) drips with contempt—they won't even use his title. Their rebellion sets up the parable's climax: the nobleman returns with royal authority and judges his enemies (v. 27). Christ's rejected kingship now will become His vindicated kingship at His return.
And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading.
View commentary
This depicts the bēma (judgment seat) of Christ (2 Corinthians 5:10), where believers give account of their stewardship. The Greek diapragmateuomai (to gain by trading) emphasizes active engagement, not passive holding. The mina (μνᾶ, mna, about three months' wages) represents gospel opportunities, spiritual gifts, and kingdom responsibilities entrusted equally to all believers.
Then came the first, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.
View commentary
The servant gives a simple report without excuses, explanations, or self-congratulation. His 1,000% return wasn't mentioned as personal achievement but as the master's possession multiplied. This models proper stewardship: recognizing that gifts, opportunities, and results all belong to God. Paul captured this: 'What hast thou that thou didst not receive?' (1 Corinthians 4:7). Kingdom work produces supernatural multiplication when faithful servants invest divine resources in gospel advance.
And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities.
View commentary
Have thou authority over ten cities (ἴσθι ἐξουσίαν ἔχων ἐπάνω δέκα πόλεων, isthi exousian echōn epanō deka poleōn)—the reward vastly exceeds the task. The Greek exousia (authority) indicates delegated governmental power. This previews the coming kingdom where Christ's faithful servants will reign with Him (Revelation 2:26-27, 20:4-6). Small faithfulness in the age of grace qualifies believers for co-regency in the age to come. This isn't about earning salvation (which is by grace through faith alone) but about rewards for service.
And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds.
View commentary
Significantly, Jesus gives no criticism of the lesser return. The parable emphasizes faithfulness with what was entrusted, not competition between servants. Different servants produce different results based on opportunities, abilities, and circumstances, but God evaluates faithfulness to what each received. This counters both envy ('Why didn't I receive more?') and pride ('Look how much I produced!'). Paul taught this principle: ministers are fellow workers, but 'God gave the increase' (1 Corinthians 3:6-9).
And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities.
View commentary
This reveals crucial kingdom principles: (1) Salvation is equal for all believers—justified by grace through faith alone. (2) Rewards vary based on faithfulness and fruitfulness. (3) Greater productivity in this age earns greater responsibility in the age to come. (4) Perfect justice governs kingdom rewards—God neither overlooks faithfulness nor inflates results. Paul confirmed this: 'Every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour' (1 Corinthians 3:8). This isn't about earning God's love (which is unmerited) but about stewardship accountability.
And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin:
View commentary
This servant represents professing believers who do nothing with gospel opportunities. He didn't steal the mina (like Judas) or openly rebel, but he failed to engage. His religion was entirely defensive: 'Don't lose what you have.' No risks, no investment, no kingdom advance. The napkin symbolizes dead orthodoxy—doctrine preserved but unproductive. James warned: 'Faith without works is dead' (James 2:26). True saving faith produces fruit; fruitless profession proves spurious.
For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.
View commentary
Thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow (αἴρεις ὃ οὐκ ἔθηκας καὶ θερίζεις ὃ οὐκ ἔσπειρας, aireis ho ouk ethēkas kai therizeis ho ouk espeiras)—he accuses the master of unjustly profiting from others' labor. This reveals his heart: he views God as a cosmic tyrant demanding the impossible, reaping benefits without sowing investment. This false theology produces paralysis: 'Why try? I'll fail and be punished.' Satan peddles this lie to neutralize believers. The truth: God is generous, providing resources, opportunities, and power for fruitful service (2 Corinthians 9:8).
And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant. Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:
View commentary
This devastating logic: 'If you truly believed I was harsh and exacting, you should have worked harder, not hidden my money in a napkin!' The servant's excuse becomes his condemnation. His inaction proved he didn't actually fear his master—if he had, he would have done something. This exposes the lie: he was lazy and indifferent, not fearful and paralyzed. Judgment will reveal self-serving excuses for what they are.
Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?
View commentary
The master's logic crushes the excuse: 'You claim you feared my standards, yet you didn't even pursue the safest, most minimal option.' Even 2-5% interest would have demonstrated some engagement. The servant's complete inaction proved his supposed 'fear' was actually contempt. This principle extends to spiritual life: if you can't plant churches, you can support missionaries; if you can't teach publicly, you can disciple privately; if you can't give much, you can give something. Faithfulness at any level beats no engagement.
And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.
View commentary
This previews Jesus's warning to Jerusalem: 'The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof' (Matthew 21:43). Israel's squandered opportunity passed to the Gentile church. Individually, believers who prove unfaithful in smaller tasks don't receive greater ones; those who faithfully multiply what they have receive more opportunities. This isn't about losing salvation (the mina isn't eternal life) but about kingdom stewardship and eternal rewards.
(And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)
View commentary
The objection reveals worldly thinking that has infected the church: 'Everyone deserves equal opportunities regardless of fruitfulness.' But kingdom stewardship operates differently: faithful managers receive more to steward; unfaithful ones lose what they had. This isn't about God's love (equal for all believers) or salvation (equally free for all who believe), but about stewardship and rewards. The objection also shows that observers will question God's justice at the judgment—yet His verdicts will stand. Human notions of 'fairness' don't bind divine judgment.
For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.
View commentary
This 'Matthew principle' operates across Scripture: those who use knowledge gain understanding; those who neglect it lose even basic comprehension. Those who exercise faith receive more faith; those who bury it lose assurance. Those who invest gifts develop skills; those who neglect them atrophy. Spiritually: those who respond to light receive more revelation; those who resist lose even the light they had (Romans 1:21-28). This isn't arbitrary but reflects how God's kingdom operates: use it or lose it. Stewardship demands engagement.
But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.
View commentary
This previews Revelation 19:15-21: Christ's return brings wrath on His enemies. The servant who hid his mina faces loss of reward; these rebels face execution. The distinction is crucial: unfaithful believers lose rewards but retain salvation; unbelievers face eternal judgment. The parable concludes with this stark warning because Jesus was approaching Jerusalem, where leaders would reject and crucify Him. Their rebellion demanded judgment. This isn't cruel vengeance but righteous justice: those who refuse the King's mercy face His wrath. Only two options exist: submit to His reign or face His judgment.
The Triumphal Entry
And when he had thus spoken, he went before, ascending up to Jerusalem.
View commentary
Luke emphasizes Christ's initiative and foreknowledge. Unlike the disciples who followed in confusion (18:34), Jesus marches resolutely toward the city that kills prophets. This willing self-sacrifice fulfills Isaiah 50:7: 'I set my face like a flint.' The journey from Jericho to Jerusalem became the most momentous week in human history.
And it came to pass, when he was come nigh to Bethphage and Bethany, at the mount called the mount of Olives, he sent two of his disciples,
View commentary
Luke alone mentions both villages, emphasizing geographical precision. Jesus had ministered in Bethany (at Lazarus's home, John 11-12) and now orchestrates His royal entry from this staging ground. The Mount of Olives overlooks the Temple Mount—from here, Jesus would survey the city He came to redeem yet must judge.
Saying, Go ye into the village over against you; in the which at your entering ye shall find a colt tied, whereon yet never man sat : loose him, and bring him hither.
View commentary
This detail fulfills Zechariah 9:9 precisely: 'Behold, thy King cometh unto thee...lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal of an ass.' Jesus deliberately stages a messianic claim that any Torah-literate Jew would recognize. The peaceful donkey contrasts with the warhorse Roman emperors rode, signaling a different kind of kingdom.
And if any man ask you, Why do ye loose him? thus shall ye say unto him, Because the Lord hath need of him.
View commentary
The sovereign God who owns 'the cattle on a thousand hills' (Psalm 50:10) here asserts His right to requisition what is His. Yet He does so with courtesy through His messengers, modeling how divine authority respects human property even while superseding it. This anticipates how Christ later taught His disciples to give to Caesar what is Caesar's—while implicitly claiming all things as His own.
And they that were sent went their way, and found even as he had said unto them.
View commentary
This small detail serves Luke's larger narrative purpose: establishing Jesus as the prophet-like-Moses who speaks God's word with perfect accuracy (Deuteronomy 18:18-22). When God's word is tested, reality conforms to it. The disciples are learning what they would later proclaim—that Jesus is Lord of history, arranging circumstances down to the location of a borrowed colt.
And as they were loosing the colt, the owners thereof said unto them, Why loose ye the colt?
View commentary
This seemingly mundane encounter reveals Christ's meticulous preparation. He arranged this beforehand, either supernaturally or through prior contact with sympathetic disciples in Bethany. The owners' question tests whether the disciples will faithfully deliver the message exactly as instructed. Their obedience to Christ's word, even when challenged, models faithful discipleship under pressure.
And they said, The Lord hath need of him.
View commentary
This terse reply encapsulates the Christian life: all we own is His, and His need is the ultimate claim. The phrase would later echo in the early church's practice of holding possessions loosely (Acts 4:32). When the Lord truly needs something, ownership yields to lordship. The owners' immediate compliance models the proper response to Christ's sovereignty over all we claim to possess.
And they brought him to Jesus: and they cast their garments upon the colt, and they set Jesus thereon.
View commentary
By setting Jesus thereon (ἐπεβίβασαν, epebibasan), the disciples physically enthroned Him for His approach to Jerusalem. This is Luke's only description of Jesus riding an animal—He normally walked. The mounting marks a deliberate departure from His usual humble transportation, a visible claim to Davidic kingship precisely at the moment when He approaches David's city to fulfill David's covenant.
And as he went, they spread their clothes in the way.
View commentary
The crowd's actions fulfill messianic expectation without Jesus explicitly commanding it. Like John the Baptist who prepared 'the way of the Lord' (3:4), these disciples literally prepare the way before Him. Their outer garments symbolize laying their very selves before Christ's feet. This extravagant devotion previews Mary's anointing (which John places earlier, at Bethany) and anticipates the early church's radical generosity.
And when he was come nigh, even now at the descent of the mount of Olives, the whole multitude of the disciples began to rejoice and praise God with a loud voice for all the mighty works that they had seen;
View commentary
Luke uniquely specifies they praised God for all the mighty works (περὶ πασῶν ὧν εἶδον δυνάμεων, peri pasōn hōn eidon dynameōn)—the healings, exorcisms, nature miracles, and especially Lazarus's resurrection. Their worship flows from witnessed evidence, not mere emotion. The descent of the Mount of Olives brought Jerusalem into view, triggering this crescendo of praise as Jesus appeared to claim His city.
Saying, Blessed be the King that cometh in the name of the Lord: peace in heaven, and glory in the highest.
View commentary
And some of the Pharisees from among the multitude said unto him, Master, rebuke thy disciples.
View commentary
This demand reveals the Pharisees' blindness: they witness mighty works yet remain unmoved, hear messianic praise yet call it blasphemy. Their request is a test—will Jesus distance Himself from His disciples' implicit messianic claims? Or will He endorse what they're saying? Jesus's response in v. 40 ('if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out') vindicates the disciples and indicts the Pharisees' spiritual deafness to the moment of their visitation (v. 44).
And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out.
View commentary
Jesus Weeps over Jerusalem
And when he was come near, he beheld the city, and wept over it,
View commentary
Saying, If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes.
View commentary
For the days shall come upon thee, that thine enemies shall cast a trench about thee, and compass thee round, and keep thee in on every side,
View commentary
This verse follows Jesus's weeping over Jerusalem (v. 41-42). His tears demonstrate that judgment brings Him no pleasure—God 'weeps' over those who reject His visitation. The days shall come warns of divine patience reaching its limit. Forty years later, Titus's legions did exactly this: built a siege wall (circumvallation), starving Jerusalem into submission. Josephus records that 1.1 million Jews died, fulfilling Jesus's prophecy in horrifying detail.
And shall lay thee even with the ground, and thy children within thee; and they shall not leave in thee one stone upon another; because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation.
View commentary
Jesus Cleanses the Temple
And he went into the temple, and began to cast out them that sold therein , and them that bought;
View commentary
The temple's Court of the Gentiles had become a marketplace selling sacrificial animals and exchanging currency. While seemingly facilitating worship, the system had become exploitative—overpriced animals, unfair exchange rates, profit-driven religion. Jesus's action is prophetic sign-act, recalling Malachi 3:1-3 ('the Lord, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple... and he shall purify the sons of Levi'). This 'cleansing' marks Jesus's formal challenge to the temple establishment, sealing His fate with authorities.
Saying unto them, It is written, My house is the house of prayer: but ye have made it a den of thieves.
View commentary
But ye have made it a den of thieves (ὑμεῖς δὲ αὐτὸν ἐποιήσατε σπήλαιον λῃστῶν, hymeis de auton epoiēsate spēlaion lēstōn)—quoting Jeremiah 7:11, Jesus condemns not just commerce but robbery. Lēstēs (robber, bandit) implies violence and exploitation, not mere shopkeeping. Jeremiah's context warned that religious ritual without justice brings judgment—within decades, Rome destroyed the temple (AD 70), vindicating Jesus's prophetic critique. The accusation 'ye have made' (epoiēsate, aorist active) assigns direct responsibility to the leaders.
And he taught daily in the temple. But the chief priests and the scribes and the chief of the people sought to destroy him,
View commentary
But the chief priests and the scribes and the chief of the people sought to destroy him (οἱ δὲ ἀρχιερεῖς καὶ οἱ γραμματεῖς ἐζήτουν αὐτὸν ἀπολέσαι, hoi de archiereis kai hoi grammateis ezētoun auton apolesai)—three power groups unite against Jesus: religious leaders (archiereis, chief priests), theological experts (grammateis, scribes), and political influencers (chief of the people). Zēteō apolesai (were seeking to destroy) uses the imperfect tense for ongoing plotting and the aorist infinitive for definite intention: total destruction, not mere silencing. The temple cleansing was last straw—Jesus threatened their economic and religious power base.
And could not find what they might do: for all the people were very attentive to hear him. were: or, hanged on him
View commentary
For all the people were very attentive to hear him (ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἅπας ἐξεκρέματο αὐτοῦ ἀκούων, ho laos gar hapas exekremato autou akouōn)—Exkremamai (to hang upon, be intent on) is vivid: the people hung on Jesus's words, utterly captivated. The imperfect tense shows continuous state; the present participle akouōn (hearing) emphasizes ongoing attention. Hapas (all, the whole) indicates widespread support—the common people recognized authentic teaching despite elite rejection.
This creates ironic contrast: religious professionals seek to destroy Jesus while ordinary people hunger for His teaching. Eventually, the leaders will manipulate a crowd (23:18-23), but for now, popular support delays their plot.