About Mark

Mark presents Jesus as the suffering Servant of God, emphasizing His actions and authority.

Author: John MarkWritten: c. AD 50-65Reading time: ~4 minVerses: 28
ServantActionAuthoritySufferingDiscipleshipMessianic Secret

Places in This Chapter

View map →

King James Version

Mark 2

28 verses with commentary

Jesus Heals a Paralytic

And again he entered into Capernaum after some days; and it was noised that he was in the house.

View commentary
Again entered Capernaum after some days noised he was in house. Again suggests pattern returning to ministry base. Capernaum headquarters for Galilean ministry. After some days interval between ministry activities showing Jesus rhythm of work rest. Noised word spread quickly. He was in house likely Peter house (1:29) or rented dwelling. Jesus fame preceded Him crowds gathered immediately. House setting intimate yet crowded. Jesus taught indoors when possible avoiding chaos of outdoor crowds. This sets stage for friends lowering paralytic through roof. Reformed theology values both public proclamation and personal ministry gathered crowds and house meetings. Early church met in homes house churches were primary gathering places.

And straightway many were gathered together, insomuch that there was no room to receive them, no, not so much as about the door: and he preached the word unto them.

View commentary
The crowd's gathering 'straightway' (immediately) shows the magnetic effect of Christ's teaching. The overflow crowd blocking even the doorway illustrates humanity's hunger for God's Word when faithfully preached. Christ's response—preaching 'the word'—identifies the primacy of verbal proclamation in His ministry. Unlike modern prioritization of signs and wonders, Christ emphasized teaching truth.

And they come unto him, bringing one sick of the palsy, which was borne of four.

View commentary
The paralytic's friends demonstrate saving faith through persistent action—they 'come' and 'bring' despite obstacles. The fourfold bearing (likely one at each corner of the mat) pictures the community nature of faith and evangelism. Their determination to get the paralytic to Jesus, despite the crowd barrier, models the earnestness and creativity required in bringing souls to Christ.

And when they could not come nigh unto him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay.

View commentary
This verse demonstrates extraordinary faith expressed through determined, creative action. The paralyzed man's friends, unable to access Jesus through the crowded doorway, climbed onto the flat roof and broke through the mud-and-thatch construction to lower their friend before Christ. The Greek word ἀπεστέγασαν (apestegasan, 'uncovered') and ἐξορύξαντες (exoryxantes, 'dug through') indicate vigorous, disruptive action. Their faith overcame social barriers (interrupting Jesus' teaching), practical obstacles (a crowded house), and physical limitations (rooftop access, removal of roofing materials). Reformed theology emphasizes that saving faith is active, persevering, and focused on bringing people to Christ. This narrative illustrates corporate faith—the paralytic's healing resulted from his friends' faith (v. 5), demonstrating the communal nature of faith and the privilege of interceding for those spiritually paralyzed by sin.

When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the palsy, Son, thy sins be forgiven thee.

View commentary
When Jesus saw their faith he said unto sick of palsy Son thy sins be forgiven thee. Jesus saw their faith active demonstrated faith. Their refers to friends who brought paralytic corporate faith intercession. Faith visible in actions not mere mental assent. He said direct address to paralytic. Son teknon term of affection endearment. Thy sins be forgiven present passive sins being forgiven. Jesus addresses spiritual need before physical. Sin is deeper problem than paralysis. Physical healing authenticates spiritual healing demonstrates Jesus authority to forgive. Reformed theology emphasizes priority of spiritual healing salvation over physical comfort. Christ came primarily to save from sin secondarily to heal bodies. Faith expressed through bringing others to Jesus intercessory ministry. Corporate faith supports individual need.

But there were certain of the scribes sitting there, and reasoning in their hearts,

View commentary
The scribes' internal reasoning (διαλογιζόμενοι ἐν ταῖς καρδίαις, dialogizomenoi en tais kardiais, 'reasoning in their hearts') reveals hardened unbelief masquerading as theological discernment. Mark emphasizes their silent objection—they didn't verbally challenge Jesus but harbored hostile thoughts. This interior resistance demonstrates that sin's root is in the heart (Mark 7:21-23). The scribes, religious experts charged with interpreting Torah, immediately questioned Jesus' authority rather than marveling at His compassion or power. Their presence in this Capernaum gathering suggests official scrutiny of Jesus' growing ministry. Reformed theology notes that unconverted religious professionals can be Christianity's fiercest opponents—their theological knowledge, divorced from humble faith, becomes a weapon against Christ.

Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive sins but God only?

View commentary
The scribes' reasoning is theologically correct: 'Who can forgive sins but God only?' (Greek ei mē heis ho theos). Forgiveness of sins belongs exclusively to God because sin offends His holiness primarily. Human forgiveness addresses interpersonal wrongs, but ultimate guilt before God requires divine pardon. The scribes accurately identify Jesus' implicit deity claim when He pronounces forgiveness (2:5). Their logic was sound: either Jesus blasphemes by usurping divine prerogative, or He is God incarnate. Jesus' subsequent healing (2:10-12) proves His authority, vindicating the deity claim. This confronts modern readers with the same choice: Jesus is either blasphemer or Lord. CS Lewis's famous trilemma applies—Jesus cannot be merely a good teacher while claiming divine authority. Reformed theology affirms Christ's full deity as essential for atonement: only God can forgive, and only man can die; thus God-man redeems.

And immediately when Jesus perceived in his spirit that they so reasoned within themselves, he said unto them, Why reason ye these things in your hearts?

View commentary
Jesus' immediate perception of the scribes' thoughts (ἐπιγνοὺς...τῷ πνεύματι, epignous...tō pneumati, 'knowing in His spirit') demonstrates His divine omniscience and supernatural knowledge of human hearts. The phrase 'in his spirit' may refer to Jesus' human spirit supernaturally illuminated by the Holy Spirit, or to His divine nature's inherent knowledge. Either interpretation affirms His deity—only God searches hearts (1 Chronicles 28:9; Jeremiah 17:10; Revelation 2:23). Jesus doesn't merely react to external criticism but addresses unspoken objections, demonstrating authority over human thoughts. His public confrontation ('Why reason ye these things?') exposes hidden sin, preventing private unbelief from festering. Reformed theology emphasizes Christ's role as heart-searching judge who will expose all secrets (Romans 2:16; 1 Corinthians 4:5).

Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk?

View commentary
Jesus poses a rhetorical question contrasting two statements: 'Thy sins be forgiven thee' versus 'Arise, and take up thy bed, and walk.' From a human perspective, pronouncing forgiveness seems 'easier' (εὐκοπώτερον, eukopōteron) because it's unverifiable—no visible evidence confirms whether sins are actually forgiven. Physical healing is 'harder' because failure is immediately obvious. Jesus' logic is profound: if He can perform the empirically verifiable miracle (healing), this authenticates His authority to perform the invisible miracle (forgiveness). The question exposes the scribes' inconsistency—they doubt His authority to forgive but will soon witness undeniable proof of His power. Reformed theology emphasizes that both forgiveness and healing require divine power; spiritual healing is actually harder than physical healing because sin's guilt before God's justice demands infinite satisfaction.

But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,)

View commentary
But that ye may know Son of man has power on earth to forgive sins he saith to sick of palsy. But adversative conjunction introduces Jesus response to skeptics. That ye may know hina eidete purpose clause. Jesus performs miracle to prove authority. Son of man Jesus self-designation from Daniel 7:13 messianic title. Has power exousia authority right and ability. On earth not just in heaven presently available. To forgive sins aphienai release remit cancel debt. Core of gospel message. He saith present tense demonstrating ongoing authority. To sick of palsy directly addresses paralytic. Healing demonstrates spiritual reality. Physical restoration validates spiritual authority. Reformed theology sees miracles as signs pointing to greater reality. Christ authority to forgive grounded in His deity and atoning work. Physical healings temporary ultimate healing at resurrection.

I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy bed, and go thy way into thine house.

View commentary
Jesus addresses the paralytic directly with three imperatives: 'I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy bed, and go thy way into thine house.' The emphatic 'I say unto thee' (σοὶ λέγω, soi legō) asserts Christ's personal authority—not 'God says' or 'in God's name,' but 'I say.' This first-person authority claim distinguishes Jesus from prophets who spoke for God; Jesus speaks as God. The command to 'arise' (ἔγειρε, egeire) uses terminology associated with resurrection (the same verb appears in Mark 5:41; 16:6), symbolically connecting physical healing with spiritual resurrection from sin's death. The command to 'take up thy bed' reverses his condition—the bed that carried him now becomes his burden to carry. Reformed theology sees this miracle as illustrative of effectual calling—Christ's powerful word creates what it commands.

And immediately he arose, took up the bed, and went forth before them all; insomuch that they were all amazed, and glorified God, saying, We never saw it on this fashion.

View commentary
The healed man's immediate obedience ('immediately he arose') demonstrates faith responding to Christ's word. The verb ἐξῆλθεν (exēlthen, 'went forth') emphasizes public departure—he walked out before the astonished crowd carrying his mat, providing irrefutable evidence of healing. The crowd's response reveals three elements: amazement (ἐξίστασθαι, existasthai, 'beside themselves'), glorifying God (δοξάζειν τὸν θεόν, doxazein ton theon), and confessing the unprecedented nature of the miracle ('We never saw it on this fashion'). However, the crowd praises God generally without explicitly acknowledging Jesus as Messiah—they witness divine power but remain uncertain about Jesus' identity. This pattern recurs in Mark: crowds marvel at miracles yet struggle with Jesus' identity.

The Calling of Levi

And he went forth again by the sea side; and all the multitude resorted unto him, and he taught them.

View commentary
Jesus 'went forth again by the sea side'—returning to public ministry after the intense confrontation with scribes. The Sea of Galilee served as a frequent teaching venue in Jesus' ministry, providing natural acoustics and space for crowds. The phrase 'all the multitude resorted unto him' (πᾶς ὁ ὄχλος ἤρχετο πρὸς αὐτόν) emphasizes universal interest—people from all backgrounds seeking Jesus. The imperfect tense indicates continuous action—crowds kept coming repeatedly. Jesus' response ('he taught them') reveals His primary mission: proclaiming God's kingdom and truth. While miracles authenticated His authority, teaching constituted His core ministry. Reformed theology emphasizes Christ's prophetic office—He is the ultimate Prophet revealing God's will, superior to Moses and all prophets.

And as he passed by, he saw Levi the son of Alphaeus sitting at the receipt of custom, and said unto him, Follow me. And he arose and followed him. at the: or, at the place where the custom was received

View commentary
As he passed by he saw Levi son of Alphaeus sitting at receipt of custom and said unto him Follow me. As passed by Jesus moving through Capernaum. He saw eiden active observation seeking. Levi Matthew tax collector. Son of Alphaeus family identification. Sitting at receipt of custom telōnion tax booth collection station. Custom duties tariffs on goods. Said legei present tense ongoing authority. Unto him directly personally. Follow me akolouthei same call to Peter Andrew James John. Tax collectors were despised as traitors collaborating with Rome. Jesus calls notorious sinner shocking religious sensibilities. Demonstrates grace reaches worst sinners. Levi immediate obedience abandoned lucrative position. Reformed theology emphasizes irresistible grace effectual calling. God chooses unlikely people for His purposes. Social outcasts included in kingdom.

And it came to pass, that, as Jesus sat at meat in his house, many publicans and sinners sat also together with Jesus and his disciples: for there were many, and they followed him.

View commentary
This verse depicts Jesus' fellowship with 'publicans and sinners'—a scandalous association that violated religious propriety. 'Many publicans and sinners sat together with Jesus and his disciples' emphasizes shared table fellowship (συνανέκειντο, synanekeinto), indicating intimate social communion. In Jewish culture, shared meals signified acceptance and friendship; to eat with someone was to endorse them. Jesus' willing association with moral and social outcasts demonstrates His mission to 'seek and save the lost' (Luke 19:10). The phrase 'for there were many, and they followed him' indicates that outcasts comprised a significant portion of Jesus' followers. Reformed theology emphasizes that Christ came to call sinners, not the righteous—His mission is redemptive, not restrictive.

And when the scribes and Pharisees saw him eat with publicans and sinners, they said unto his disciples, How is it that he eateth and drinketh with publicans and sinners?

View commentary
The scribes and Pharisees' question ('How is it that he eateth and drinketh with publicans and sinners?') reveals their theological framework: association with sinners implies approval of sin. They assumed that holiness requires separation from contamination. Jesus' behavior scandalized them because rabbis typically avoided such fellowship to maintain ritual purity and moral reputation. However, they failed to distinguish between compromising with sin and showing mercy to sinners. Jesus' holiness wasn't fragile ceremonialism requiring protective isolation but robust righteousness that transforms others through contact. Reformed theology recognizes two errors: the Pharisaic error of self-righteous separation, and the worldly error of compromising with sin.

When Jesus heard it, he saith unto them, They that are whole have no need of the physician, but they that are sick: I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

View commentary
Jesus responds to Pharisaic criticism with a powerful analogy revealing His mission's heart. The metaphor of physician and sick establishes that recognizing spiritual sickness is prerequisite to receiving Christ's healing. "They that are whole" (οἱ ἰσχύοντες, hoi ischyontes) refers to those who perceive themselves as healthy, not those who actually are—the Pharisees considered themselves righteous and thus had no sense of need for Jesus. "They that are sick" (οἱ κακῶς ἔχοντες, hoi kakōs echontes) are those who recognize their spiritual disease—tax collectors, sinners, and outcasts knew their desperate need. The verb "have need" (χρείαν ἔχουσιν, chreian echousin) indicates absolute necessity—the sick cannot heal themselves but require external intervention. Jesus' statement "I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance" (οὐκ ἦλθον καλέσαι δικαίους ἀλλὰ ἁμαρτωλούς, ouk ēlthon kalesai dikaious alla hamartōlous) reveals His mission: He seeks those who know they need salvation, not those who trust in their own righteousness. The irony is sharp—the "righteous" Pharisees were actually sinners who refused to acknowledge their condition, while acknowledged "sinners" who repented found salvation. Reformed theology emphasizes that the first work of the Spirit is conviction of sin (John 16:8)—until people recognize their spiritual death and inability to save themselves, they won't seek Christ the Physician.

A Question About Fasting

And the disciples of John and of the Pharisees used to fast: and they come and say unto him, Why do the disciples of John and of the Pharisees fast, but thy disciples fast not?

View commentary
This verse presents a question about fasting practices that exposes different spiritual approaches. 'The disciples of John and of the Pharisees used to fast' (imperfect tense indicating regular practice). Both groups emphasized ascetic discipline—John's disciples preparing for the coming kingdom, Pharisees demonstrating piety. The questioners contrast this with Jesus' disciples who don't fast, implying spiritual laxity. Jesus' response (vv. 19-20) redefines fasting's purpose: not mechanical ritual but appropriate response to circumstances. Reformed theology emphasizes that spiritual disciplines serve gospel purposes, not merit-earning works. Fasting expresses dependence on God and mourning over sin, but can become empty formalism.

And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bridechamber fast, while the bridegroom is with them? as long as they have the bridegroom with them, they cannot fast.

View commentary
Jesus responds with a rhetorical question comparing His disciples to wedding guests ('children of the bridechamber'). Wedding guests don't fast during celebration because it's inappropriate. Jesus identifies Himself as the bridegroom, a messianic title rich with Old Testament significance. God repeatedly portrays Himself as Israel's husband (Isaiah 54:5; 62:5; Hosea 2:16). By claiming the bridegroom role, Jesus asserts deity and announces that the promised marriage between God and His people is being consummated in His ministry. Reformed theology sees the church as Christ's bride (Ephesians 5:25-27), experiencing betrothal now and consummation at His return.

But the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken away from them, and then shall they fast in those days.

View commentary
Jesus prophesies His death: 'But the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken from them.' The phrase 'taken from them' (ἀπαρθῇ) suggests violent removal, foreshadowing crucifixion. This is Mark's first explicit reference to Jesus' coming passion. The verb echoes Isaiah 53:8: 'He was taken from the earth,' identifying Jesus as the suffering servant. Jesus predicts mourning that will accompany His death—appropriate occasion for fasting. This validates fasting as proper response to Christ's absence, not as merit-earning work. Reformed theology distinguishes Old Covenant fasting (anticipating Messiah) from New Covenant fasting (mourning Christ's physical absence while awaiting return).

No man also seweth a piece of new cloth on an old garment: else the new piece that filled it up taketh away from the old, and the rent is made worse. new cloth: or, raw, or, unwrought cloth

View commentary
Jesus uses a parable contrasting old and new: 'No man seweth a piece of new cloth on an old garment.' The 'new cloth' is unshrunk fabric that will contract when washed. Sewing it onto old, already-shrunk garment creates worse tear when the new cloth shrinks. This illustrates the incompatibility of Jesus' new covenant with old covenant forms. The new cloth represents the gospel kingdom Jesus inaugurates; the old garment represents Pharisaic Judaism. Jesus' message can't be patched onto the old system—it requires completely new wineskins. Reformed theology emphasizes the radical newness of new covenant—not mere reform but fulfillment and transformation.

And no man putteth new wine into old bottles: else the new wine doth burst the bottles, and the wine is spilled, and the bottles will be marred: but new wine must be put into new bottles. bottles: or, sacks of skin

View commentary
Jesus extends the new-versus-old contrast: 'No man putteth new wine into old bottles.' New wine, still fermenting, produces gas that expands containers. Old wineskins, already stretched, lack flexibility and burst under pressure. This illustrates the gospel's dynamic, transformative power that can't be contained in old covenant forms. The 'new wine' represents the Holy Spirit's energizing presence. The 'new bottles' represent new covenant structures—faith community not bound by ceremonial law but characterized by Spirit-indwelling, faith in Christ, and mission to all nations. Reformed theology emphasizes that the gospel creates new people requiring new forms.

Jesus Is Lord of the Sabbath

And it came to pass, that he went through the corn fields on the sabbath day; and his disciples began, as they went , to pluck the ears of corn.

View commentary
This verse introduces a Sabbath controversy: Jesus' disciples 'plucked the ears of corn' as they walked through grainfields on the Sabbath. The imperfect tense indicates ongoing action. Deuteronomy 23:25 permitted this, but Pharisaic tradition classified it as 'harvesting' and thus Sabbath-work violation. The disciples' action was legal concerning property rights but questionable concerning Sabbath observance according to oral tradition. Jesus permits this, implying that Sabbath law permits necessary provision. Reformed theology emphasizes that Christ is Lord of the Sabbath (v. 28), with authority to interpret its proper observance.

And the Pharisees said unto him, Behold, why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?

View commentary
The Pharisees challenge Jesus: 'Behold, why do they on the sabbath day that which is not lawful?' Their question assumes the disciples violated Sabbath law. The word 'behold' draws attention dramatically. The phrase 'not lawful' appeals to legal precedent and tradition. The Pharisees don't question Jesus directly but accuse His disciples, attempting to undermine His authority. This tactic appears repeatedly—opponents attack Jesus indirectly. Their concern wasn't genuine compassion for Sabbath honor but desire to discredit Jesus. Reformed theology notes that legalists emphasize external conformity while missing the law's spiritual purpose.

And he said unto them, Have ye never read what David did, when he had need, and was an hungred, he, and they that were with him?

View commentary
Jesus responds to Pharisaic accusation by appealing to Scripture: 'Have ye never read what David did?' This rhetorical question implies the Pharisees, Scripture experts, missed the text's obvious implications. Jesus references 1 Samuel 21:1-6, where David ate consecrated bread reserved for priests. David's action technically violated ceremonial law, yet Scripture doesn't condemn him—necessity and God's mercy trump ceremonial restrictions. Jesus' argument proceeds from lesser to greater: if David's need justified eating consecrated bread, how much more do Jesus' disciples' needs justify plucking grain? Reformed theology emphasizes that moral law's heart supersedes ceremonial applications when they conflict.

How he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest, and did eat the shewbread , which is not lawful to eat but for the priests, and gave also to them which were with him?

View commentary
Jesus provides historical specificity: David entered 'the house of God' during 'Abiathar the high priest.' He 'did eat the shewbread, which is not lawful to eat but for the priests,' and 'gave also to them which were with him.' David didn't merely eat forbidden bread himself but shared it with his men—compounding the ceremonial violation. Despite this, Scripture records no divine judgment, suggesting God prioritized mercy and human need over ceremonial restriction. Jesus' point is powerful: if God excused David's violation to meet physical hunger, how much more does Jesus have authority to permit disciples to pluck grain on Sabbath for legitimate need?

And he said unto them, The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath:

View commentary
Jesus states a foundational principle: 'The sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath.' This revolutionizes Sabbath understanding. The verb 'was made' (ἐγένετο) indicates creation/institution—God designed Sabbath as gift to humanity. The prepositional phrase 'for man' expresses purpose—Sabbath exists to benefit humanity, not burden it. God instituted Sabbath rest as blessing: physical refreshment, spiritual renewal, worship opportunity. The Pharisees inverted this relationship, making humanity exist to serve Sabbath regulations. Jesus reclaims Sabbath's original purpose. Reformed theology applies this: all God's commands exist for human flourishing and God's glory.

Therefore the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath.

View commentary
'Therefore the Son of Man is Lord also of the Sabbath' asserts Jesus' sovereignty over the fourth commandment. The Sabbath, instituted at creation (Genesis 2:2-3) and codified in the Decalogue (Exodus 20:8-11), was God's gift showing His lordship over time. By claiming lordship over Sabbath, Jesus claims divine authority. The conjunction 'therefore' (hōste) connects to verse 27: 'The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath.' Jesus reverses Pharisaic priorities, showing Sabbath serves humanity's good under God's design, not as burdensome legalism. As Lord of Sabbath, Christ determines its proper observance. Reformed theology sees the moral law (Ten Commandments) as eternally binding but fulfilled in Christ, who is our Sabbath rest (Hebrews 4:9-10). The weekly Sabbath principle continues as worship on the Lord's Day, commemorating resurrection.

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study