About 1 Samuel

1 Samuel records the transition from judges to monarchy, including Samuel's ministry, Saul's rise and fall, and David's anointing.

Author: Samuel, Nathan, GadWritten: c. 1050-900 BCReading time: ~4 minVerses: 31
TransitionKingshipObedienceRejectionGod's SovereigntyHeart

King James Version

1 Samuel 30

31 verses with commentary

David Defeats the Amalekites

And it came to pass, when David and his men were come to Ziklag on the third day, that the Amalekites had invaded the south, and Ziklag, and smitten Ziklag, and burned it with fire;

View commentary
David's arrival at Ziklag on 'the third day' places him away from both armies when Gilboa's battle decides Saul's fate. The discovery of Amalekite destruction creates personal crisis amid national transition. The Hebrew 'pashetu' (invaded) and 'wayyakku' (smote) describe military assault, while 'wayyisrefu-ha ba'esh' (burned it with fire) indicates total destruction. David, having avoided one disaster by being dismissed from the Philistine army, immediately faces another: his own base destroyed and families captured.

And had taken the women captives, that were therein: they slew not any, either great or small, but carried them away, and went on their way.

View commentary
The Amalekites' unusual restraint in taking captives rather than killing presents a theological puzzle. The Hebrew 'lo hemitu' (they did not kill) indicates deliberate decision. This mercy may reflect slave-trade economics (living captives were valuable) or divine providence preserving lives for rescue. The phrase 'carried them away' (Hebrew: 'wayyinhagu') suggests forced march with captives, including women and children. What appeared as disaster contained the seeds of restoration.

So David and his men came to the city, and, behold, it was burned with fire; and their wives, and their sons, and their daughters, were taken captives.

View commentary
The scene of David and his men encountering the burning ruins of their home emphasizes complete devastation. The Hebrew construction 'hineh seruphah ba'esh' (behold, burned with fire) captures the visual shock. The threefold loss, 'wives, sons, and daughters,' encompasses the entire domestic sphere. For ancient warriors, whose purpose centered on protecting family, this represented total failure. The men who followed David as protector found their trust apparently betrayed by his absence during the raid.

Then David and the people that were with him lifted up their voice and wept, until they had no more power to weep.

View commentary
The description of collective grief, 'lifted up their voice and wept, until they had no more power to weep,' expresses exhaustion through mourning. The Hebrew 'ad asher en bahem koach livekot' (until there was no strength in them to weep) captures the physical depletion of intense grief. David shares this mourning equally with his men, not standing apart as leader but participating in the community's devastation. Even future kings must grieve their losses fully.

And David's two wives were taken captives, Ahinoam the Jezreelitess, and Abigail the wife of Nabal the Carmelite.

View commentary
The personal detail that David's own two wives were among the captives connects the leader to his followers' suffering. Ahinoam and Abigail, named specifically, represent David's own stake in the disaster. He does not stand above his men's loss but shares it personally. This shared experience positions David to lead from common suffering rather than detached command. The repetition of names emphasizes that this is not abstract loss but intensely personal grief.

And David was greatly distressed; for the people spake of stoning him, because the soul of all the people was grieved, every man for his sons and for his daughters: but David encouraged himself in the LORD his God. grieved: Heb. bitter

View commentary
The crisis intensifies as David's men contemplate stoning him, blaming his leadership for their disaster. The Hebrew 'kiy-mar nephesh kol-ha'am' (because the soul of all the people was bitter) explains the danger through the vocabulary of bitterness. David is 'greatly distressed' (Hebrew: 'tsarar... me'od'), using language suggesting constriction and anguish. Yet in this darkest moment comes the pivotal response: 'David encouraged himself in the LORD his God' (Hebrew: 'wayyithchazzeq David baYHWH elohav'). This self-strengthening in God becomes the turning point.

And David said to Abiathar the priest, Ahimelech's son, I pray thee, bring me hither the ephod. And Abiathar brought thither the ephod to David.

View commentary
David's immediate request for the ephod demonstrates his spiritual instinct under pressure. Rather than reacting in anger, fear, or self-defense, he seeks divine guidance. The ephod, which Abiathar had brought when fleeing Saul's massacre at Nob (23:6-9), contained the Urim and Thummim for divine consultation. David's first response to crisis is inquiry of the LORD, contrasting sharply with Saul's forbidden consultation in chapter 28. Two leaders facing crisis turn to opposite sources.

And David enquired at the LORD, saying, Shall I pursue after this troop? shall I overtake them? And he answered him, Pursue: for thou shalt surely overtake them, and without fail recover all.

View commentary
David's inquiry and God's response model the prayer-and-guidance pattern Scripture commends. The questions are practical: 'Shall I pursue? Shall I overtake?' The answers are specific and encouraging: 'Pursue: for thou shalt surely overtake them, and without fail recover all.' The Hebrew emphatic construction 'haseg tasig wehatsel tatsil' (surely overtake, surely recover) guarantees success. This divine assurance transforms the situation from hopeless grief to purposeful action. God's word provides both direction and confidence.

So David went, he and the six hundred men that were with him, and came to the brook Besor, where those that were left behind stayed.

View commentary
The pursuit begins with all six hundred men, demonstrating David's ability to rally grieving, bitter men for immediate military action. The brook Besor, marking the southern boundary of settled territory, becomes a dividing point in the narrative. The phrase 'those that were left behind stayed' introduces the issue of exhausted soldiers that will create later conflict. David's leadership must now balance military necessity with care for the weak.

But David pursued, he and four hundred men: for two hundred abode behind, which were so faint that they could not go over the brook Besor.

View commentary
The division of forces, four hundred pursuing while two hundred remain, raises questions David will address later. The Hebrew 'piggeru' (too faint, exhausted) describes men beyond physical capacity to continue. The three-day return march from Aphek plus emotional devastation had depleted these men completely. David neither condemns their weakness nor delays the pursuit; he assigns them guard duty and proceeds. Leadership requires accepting varied capacity while maintaining mission focus.

And they found an Egyptian in the field, and brought him to David, and gave him bread, and he did eat; and they made him drink water;

View commentary
The discovery of the Egyptian servant introduces providential guidance through unexpected means. Finding a starving foreigner 'in the field' (Hebrew: 'basadeh') and providing bread and water demonstrates the humanitarian impulse that will later characterize David's reign. The care shown to this abandoned slave contrasts with the Amalekites' cruelty that left him to die. David's compassion will prove strategically valuable, but the narrative presents it as genuine human kindness.

And they gave him a piece of a cake of figs, and two clusters of raisins: and when he had eaten, his spirit came again to him: for he had eaten no bread, nor drunk any water, three days and three nights.

View commentary
The detailed provisions, 'cake of figs, two clusters of raisins,' and restored hydration, bring the dying man back to life. The phrase 'his spirit came again to him' (Hebrew: 'watashav rucho elav') describes physical revival through nourishment. The three days without food or water paralleled the time David traveled from Aphek to Ziklag, suggesting the raid occurred just as David departed. Divine timing preserved this witness who would guide David to the enemy camp.

And David said unto him, To whom belongest thou? and whence art thou? And he said, I am a young man of Egypt, servant to an Amalekite ; and my master left me, because three days agone I fell sick.

View commentary
The interrogation reveals essential intelligence: the man was Egyptian, servant to an Amalekite, abandoned when ill. His nationality connects to Israel's historic experience of Egyptian bondage, creating subtle ironic resonance. The master's cruelty in abandoning him ('my master left me') mirrors Pharaoh's cruel treatment of Israel's sick and weak. This discarded servant holds the key to David's rescue mission.

We made an invasion upon the south of the Cherethites, and upon the coast which belongeth to Judah, and upon the south of Caleb; and we burned Ziklag with fire.

View commentary
The Egyptian's report catalogues the Amalekite raid's extent: the Cherethites (Philistine mercenaries), Judah's territory, and Caleb's portion. The burning of Ziklag is mentioned specifically. This comprehensive raiding indicates a major Amalekite expedition, not a small band. The geographic scope shows they exploited the Philistine army's absence to raid widely. David now understands the full extent of the disaster and the enemy's direction of travel.

And David said to him, Canst thou bring me down to this company? And he said, Swear unto me by God, that thou wilt neither kill me, nor deliver me into the hands of my master, and I will bring thee down to this company.

View commentary
David's request for guidance and the Egyptian's condition for compliance reveal mutual vulnerability. The slave, having been abandoned to die, fears being returned to his master or killed. His demand for an oath 'by God' shows he understood the binding nature of Israelite religious commitment. David's willingness to swear demonstrates his integrity; he will not exploit this vulnerable person even when urgency demands quick action. Trust must be established even in crisis.

And when he had brought him down, behold, they were spread abroad upon all the earth, eating and drinking, and dancing, because of all the great spoil that they had taken out of the land of the Philistines, and out of the land of Judah.

View commentary
The Egyptian guides David to a scene of overconfident celebration: the Amalekites 'spread abroad upon all the earth, eating and drinking, and dancing.' The Hebrew 'chogegim' (celebrating, making festival) suggests religious feasting, possibly thanking their gods for successful plunder. Their security 'because of all the great spoil' creates vulnerability. The victory celebration becomes the context for their defeat. God uses their moment of greatest confidence as the occasion for their destruction.

And David smote them from the twilight even unto the evening of the next day: and there escaped not a man of them, save four hundred young men, which rode upon camels, and fled. the next: Heb. their morrow

View commentary
David's attack 'from the twilight even unto the evening of the next day' indicates sustained combat lasting approximately twenty-four hours. The devastating results, 'there escaped not a man of them, save four hundred young men,' represent nearly complete destruction. Those who escaped, 'which rode upon camels,' had both the mounts and youth necessary for flight. The completeness of victory fulfills God's promise to 'without fail recover all' while executing judgment on Amalek.

And David recovered all that the Amalekites had carried away: and David rescued his two wives.

View commentary
The brief statement 'David recovered all' fulfills the divine promise exactly. The specific mention that 'David rescued his two wives' personalizes the victory. The Hebrew 'wayyatsel' (delivered, rescued) uses the same verb God employed in His promise. What David received through inquiry of the LORD, he now sees accomplished through military action. The correspondence between promise and fulfillment demonstrates the reliability of divine guidance.

And there was nothing lacking to them, neither small nor great, neither sons nor daughters, neither spoil, nor any thing that they had taken to them: David recovered all.

View commentary
The emphatic repetition 'there was nothing lacking... David recovered all' emphasizes total restoration. The Hebrew construction 'lo ne'edar lahem... hakkol heshiv David' (nothing was missing... everything David brought back) stresses completeness. Not merely lives but possessions, relationships, and honor were restored. The categories, 'small nor great, neither sons nor daughters, neither spoil,' cover every dimension of loss. God's restoration exceeds mere survival to include full redemption.

And David took all the flocks and the herds, which they drave before those other cattle, and said, This is David's spoil.

View commentary
The additional spoil beyond what the Amalekites had stolen represents the increase from David's victory. The phrase 'This is David's spoil' may indicate his men's acclaim or an official distribution designation. This surplus, plundered from the Amalekites themselves, provided resources David would strategically distribute. What began as devastating loss concludes with net gain. God's restoration not only recovers what was lost but adds blessing beyond the original state.

And David came to the two hundred men, which were so faint that they could not follow David, whom they had made also to abide at the brook Besor: and they went forth to meet David, and to meet the people that were with him: and when David came near to the people, he saluted them. saluted: or, asked them how they did

View commentary
David's return to the two hundred who stayed at Besor receives initial hostility from a portion of his forces. Yet David 'saluted them' (Hebrew: 'wayyish'al lahem leshalom'), asking about their welfare with genuine concern. His greeting precedes any discussion of spoil distribution, establishing that relationships matter more than material concerns. David's character shows in how he treats those who could not complete the mission.

Then answered all the wicked men and men of Belial, of those that went with David, and said, Because they went not with us, we will not give them ought of the spoil that we have recovered, save to every man his wife and his children, that they may lead them away, and depart. those: Heb. men

View commentary
The 'wicked men and men of Belial' (Hebrew: 'ish-ra' uveli-ya'al') among David's forces reveal the moral diversity within his band. Their refusal to share spoil with those who stayed behind reflects a meritocratic principle: only those who fought deserve reward. The grudging allowance that each man may take 'his wife and his children' without additional spoil treats the exhausted men as charity cases. This attitude contradicts the unity David's leadership requires.

Then said David, Ye shall not do so, my brethren, with that which the LORD hath given us, who hath preserved us, and delivered the company that came against us into our hand.

View commentary
David's correction grounds spoil distribution in theology, not merit: 'that which the LORD hath given us.' The Hebrew 'asher natan YHWH lanu' (which the LORD gave to us) reframes the victory as divine gift, not human achievement. By invoking God's preservation and deliverance, David reminds the warriors that they are recipients, not earners, of victory. This theological foundation removes grounds for boasting and establishes grace-based sharing. What God gives freely should be distributed generously.

For who will hearken unto you in this matter? but as his part is that goeth down to the battle, so shall his part be that tarrieth by the stuff: they shall part alike.

View commentary
David establishes an enduring principle: 'as his part is that goeth down to the battle, so shall his part be that tarrieth by the stuff.' The Hebrew uses identical terminology ('chelqo... kechelqo') to emphasize equality. Those who guard supplies serve the same cause as those who fight. This statute recognizes that complex operations require varied roles, all essential to success. David's ruling becomes precedent ('unto this day'), shaping Israelite practice for generations.

And it was so from that day forward, that he made it a statute and an ordinance for Israel unto this day. forward: Heb. and forward

View commentary
The narrative notes that David's ruling became permanent policy: 'a statute and an ordinance for Israel unto this day.' The Hebrew 'choq umishpat' (statute and ordinance) uses legal terminology for binding regulations. David's wisdom in this moment established precedent extending beyond the immediate situation. Future generations inherited this principle of equal sharing. Leadership decisions in crisis often shape long-term policy.

And when David came to Ziklag, he sent of the spoil unto the elders of Judah, even to his friends, saying, Behold a present for you of the spoil of the enemies of the LORD; present: Heb. blessing

View commentary
David's distribution of spoil to 'the elders of Judah' reveals strategic thinking during national transition. The phrase 'even to his friends' (Hebrew: 'lere'ehu') indicates these were allies who had supported him during his wilderness years. The framing, 'a present for you of the spoil of the enemies of the LORD,' connects the gift to Israel's ancient conflict with Amalek. David positions himself as the one completing what Saul failed to do, subtly preparing for kingship while Saul still reigns.

To them which were in Bethel, and to them which were in south Ramoth, and to them which were in Jattir,

View commentary
The list of recipient cities begins with Beth-el, south Ramoth, and Jattir. These southern Judean locations had provided refuge during David's fugitive years. The specific naming of these towns preserves historical memory of David's network of support. Each name represents a community that risked Saul's anger by protecting David. His gifts now reward their loyalty and strengthen future alliance.

And to them which were in Aroer, and to them which were in Siphmoth, and to them which were in Eshtemoa,

View commentary
The list continues with Aroer, Siphmoth, and Eshtemoa, further demonstrating David's extensive network throughout Judah. These communities in the Negev region had apparently provided supplies, information, or refuge during David's wilderness years. David's generosity now extends beyond simple gratitude to political consolidation of future support.

And to them which were in Rachal, and to them which were in the cities of the Jerahmeelites, and to them which were in the cities of the Kenites,

View commentary
Rachal, the cities of the Jerahmeelites, and the cities of the Kenites receive gifts, extending David's reach to tribal groups allied with Judah. The Jerahmeelites, descendants of Jerahmeel son of Hezron (1 Chronicles 2:9), were a Judean clan. The Kenites, descendants of Jethro's family, had allied with Israel since Moses' time. David's gifts strengthen ties with these associated peoples who would later support his kingship.

And to them which were in Hormah, and to them which were in Chorashan, and to them which were in Athach,

View commentary
Hormah, Chorashan, and Athach continue the list of gift recipients. These towns in the Negev region complete the geographic sweep of David's generosity through southern Judah. The comprehensive distribution ensures no community that supported David feels forgotten. Each gift strengthens David's political position while genuinely honoring those who risked helping him.

And to them which were in Hebron, and to all the places where David himself and his men were wont to haunt.

View commentary
The list culminates with Hebron, soon to become David's first capital, and 'all the places where David himself and his men were wont to haunt.' The Hebrew 'hithhalekh-sham' (walked about there) indicates regular movement through these regions. Hebron's prominent mention anticipates its role in David's imminent ascension. This distribution of spoil represents the final preparation before David's wilderness period ends and his kingship begins.

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study