King James Version
1 Samuel 10
27 verses with commentary
Saul Anointed King
Then Samuel took a vial of oil, and poured it upon his head, and kissed him, and said, Is it not because the LORD hath anointed thee to be captain over his inheritance?
View commentary
Then Samuel took a vial of oil, and poured it upon his head, and kissed him, and said, Is it not because the LORD hath anointed thee to be captain over his inheritance?
The Hebrew word for 'vial' (pak) denotes a small flask, distinguishing this private anointing from the later public ceremony. The term 'anointed' (mashach) carries profound theological weight, as it designates one set apart for divine service. Notably, Samuel calls Saul 'captain' (nagid) rather than 'king' (melek), emphasizing that the true King remains Yahweh Himself. The anointing oil symbolized the Spirit's empowerment for leadership, a practice later applied to priests and prophets. Samuel's kiss represented covenantal blessing and recognition of divine appointment. This moment foreshadows the ultimate Anointed One (Messiah/Christ), who would be prophet, priest, and king. The phrase 'his inheritance' (nachalah) reminds us that Israel belongs to God alone; Saul is merely a steward over what remains God's possession.
The Hebrew word for 'vial' (pak) denotes a small flask, distinguishing this private anointing from the later public ceremony. The term 'anointed' (mashach) carries profound theological weight, as it designates one set apart for divine service. Notably, Samuel calls Saul 'captain' (nagid) rather than 'king' (melek), emphasizing that the true King remains Yahweh Himself. The anointing oil symbolized the Spirit's empowerment for leadership, a practice later applied to priests and prophets. Samuel's kiss represented covenantal blessing and recognition of divine appointment. This moment foreshadows the ultimate Anointed One (Messiah/Christ), who would be prophet, priest, and king. The phrase 'his inheritance' (nachalah) reminds us that Israel belongs to God alone; Saul is merely a steward over what remains God's possession.
When thou art departed from me to day, then thou shalt find two men by Rachel's sepulchre in the border of Benjamin at Zelzah; and they will say unto thee, The asses which thou wentest to seek are found: and, lo, thy father hath left the care of the asses, and sorroweth for you, saying, What shall I do for my son? care: Heb. business
View commentary
When thou art departed from me to day, then thou shalt find two men by Rachel's sepulchre in the border of Benjamin at Zelzah; and they will say unto thee, The asses which thou wentest to seek are found: and, lo, thy father hath left the care of the asses, and sorroweth for you, saying, What shall I do for my son?
Samuel provides the first of three confirming signs to validate Saul's divine appointment. The location at Rachel's tomb is deeply symbolic: Rachel was the mother of Benjamin, Saul's tribe, and her death while giving birth to Benjamin (Genesis 35:16-20) connects to themes of tribal identity and destiny. The Hebrew 'sorroweth' (da'ag) indicates anxious care, showing Kish's fatherly concern had shifted from property to person. God's providence orchestrated mundane circumstances (lost donkeys) for monumental purposes (establishing kingship). This sign would build Saul's confidence that Samuel's words were genuinely from God. The specificity of the prophecy - two men, precise location, exact words - demonstrates God's exhaustive knowledge of future events, a hallmark of true prophecy distinguishing Israel's God from pagan deities.
Samuel provides the first of three confirming signs to validate Saul's divine appointment. The location at Rachel's tomb is deeply symbolic: Rachel was the mother of Benjamin, Saul's tribe, and her death while giving birth to Benjamin (Genesis 35:16-20) connects to themes of tribal identity and destiny. The Hebrew 'sorroweth' (da'ag) indicates anxious care, showing Kish's fatherly concern had shifted from property to person. God's providence orchestrated mundane circumstances (lost donkeys) for monumental purposes (establishing kingship). This sign would build Saul's confidence that Samuel's words were genuinely from God. The specificity of the prophecy - two men, precise location, exact words - demonstrates God's exhaustive knowledge of future events, a hallmark of true prophecy distinguishing Israel's God from pagan deities.
Then shalt thou go on forward from thence, and thou shalt come to the plain of Tabor, and there shall meet thee three men going up to God to Bethel, one carrying three kids, and another carrying three loaves of bread, and another carrying a bottle of wine:
View commentary
Then shalt thou go on forward from thence, and thou shalt come to the plain of Tabor, and there shall meet thee three men going up to God to Beth-el, one carrying three kids, and another carrying three loaves of bread, and another carrying a bottle of wine:
The second sign involves an encounter with pilgrims traveling to Bethel for worship. The Hebrew 'elon' (translated 'plain') likely refers to the oak or terebinth of Tabor, a notable landmark. These three men carry the essential elements of sacrifice: kids (young goats) for the animal offering, bread as a grain offering accompaniment, and wine for the drink offering. Their journey 'up to God' (el-ha'elohim) reflects the theological understanding of worship as ascent into God's presence. Bethel, meaning 'house of God,' was where Jacob encountered God (Genesis 28) and remained a worship site before Jerusalem's centralization. This sign would demonstrate that God controls not only Saul's path but also the movements of all His people, weaving individual lives into His grand tapestry.
The second sign involves an encounter with pilgrims traveling to Bethel for worship. The Hebrew 'elon' (translated 'plain') likely refers to the oak or terebinth of Tabor, a notable landmark. These three men carry the essential elements of sacrifice: kids (young goats) for the animal offering, bread as a grain offering accompaniment, and wine for the drink offering. Their journey 'up to God' (el-ha'elohim) reflects the theological understanding of worship as ascent into God's presence. Bethel, meaning 'house of God,' was where Jacob encountered God (Genesis 28) and remained a worship site before Jerusalem's centralization. This sign would demonstrate that God controls not only Saul's path but also the movements of all His people, weaving individual lives into His grand tapestry.
And they will salute thee, and give thee two loaves of bread; which thou shalt receive of their hands. salute: Heb. ask thee of peace
View commentary
And they will salute thee, and give thee two loaves of bread; which thou shalt receive of their hands.
The pilgrims' spontaneous gift to Saul carries multiple layers of significance. The Hebrew 'sha'al leshalom' (salute) literally means 'ask concerning your peace/welfare,' a formal greeting recognizing dignity. Their offering of two loaves from their three demonstrates generous hospitality despite being en route to worship. Saul is instructed to 'receive' (laqach) this gift - an act of humility for one newly anointed as leader. This moment prefigures how God's chosen leaders should receive provision from God's people. The bread also echoes the showbread in the tabernacle, sacred bread that would later figure significantly when David took the showbread from Ahimelech (1 Samuel 21). This small act of sharing prepared Saul for understanding that leadership involves receiving from others, not merely commanding them.
The pilgrims' spontaneous gift to Saul carries multiple layers of significance. The Hebrew 'sha'al leshalom' (salute) literally means 'ask concerning your peace/welfare,' a formal greeting recognizing dignity. Their offering of two loaves from their three demonstrates generous hospitality despite being en route to worship. Saul is instructed to 'receive' (laqach) this gift - an act of humility for one newly anointed as leader. This moment prefigures how God's chosen leaders should receive provision from God's people. The bread also echoes the showbread in the tabernacle, sacred bread that would later figure significantly when David took the showbread from Ahimelech (1 Samuel 21). This small act of sharing prepared Saul for understanding that leadership involves receiving from others, not merely commanding them.
After that thou shalt come to the hill of God, where is the garrison of the Philistines: and it shall come to pass, when thou art come thither to the city, that thou shalt meet a company of prophets coming down from the high place with a psaltery, and a tabret, and a pipe, and a harp, before them; and they shall prophesy:
View commentary
After that thou shalt come to the hill of God, where is the garrison of the Philistines: and it shall come to pass, when thou art come thither to the city, that thou shalt meet a company of prophets coming down from the high place with a psaltery, and a tabret, and a pipe, and a harp, before them; and they shall prophesy:
The third sign occurs at Gibeah (gib'at ha'elohim, 'hill of God'), significantly also Saul's hometown. The juxtaposition of a Philistine garrison at 'God's hill' emphasizes Israel's subjugation and the urgent need for deliverance. The 'company of prophets' (chevel nevi'im) refers to a prophetic band or school, an institution Samuel apparently established to preserve and teach God's word during spiritually dark times. The musical instruments - psaltery (nebel, a harp-like instrument), tabret (toph, a hand drum), pipe (chalil, a flute), and harp (kinnor, David's instrument) - accompanied prophetic worship. Music in Israel facilitated spiritual receptivity to God's Spirit, a pattern seen throughout Scripture. These prophets 'coming down' from worship would meet Saul ascending, symbolizing the intersection of divine initiative and human response.
The third sign occurs at Gibeah (gib'at ha'elohim, 'hill of God'), significantly also Saul's hometown. The juxtaposition of a Philistine garrison at 'God's hill' emphasizes Israel's subjugation and the urgent need for deliverance. The 'company of prophets' (chevel nevi'im) refers to a prophetic band or school, an institution Samuel apparently established to preserve and teach God's word during spiritually dark times. The musical instruments - psaltery (nebel, a harp-like instrument), tabret (toph, a hand drum), pipe (chalil, a flute), and harp (kinnor, David's instrument) - accompanied prophetic worship. Music in Israel facilitated spiritual receptivity to God's Spirit, a pattern seen throughout Scripture. These prophets 'coming down' from worship would meet Saul ascending, symbolizing the intersection of divine initiative and human response.
And the Spirit of the LORD will come upon thee, and thou shalt prophesy with them, and shalt be turned into another man.
View commentary
And the Spirit of the LORD will come upon thee, and thou shalt prophesy with them, and shalt be turned into another man.
This verse marks a pivotal moment in redemptive history as Samuel predicts the Spirit's empowerment of Israel's first king. The Hebrew 'tsalach' (come upon) implies a rushing or overwhelming force, the same word used of Samson (Judges 14:6, 19; 15:14). Unlike the permanent indwelling believers experience under the New Covenant, Old Testament Spirit empowerment was typically temporary and task-specific. The phrase 'turned into another man' (nehepakta le'ish acher) indicates genuine transformation, not mere external change. This raises profound questions about Saul's later apostasy: how could one so transformed fall so far? Reformed theology recognizes that powerful spiritual experiences do not guarantee persevering faith; only God's electing grace preserves His chosen ones. Saul's prophesying authenticated his divine calling publicly, yet his subsequent history warns that spiritual gifts are not evidence of saving grace.
This verse marks a pivotal moment in redemptive history as Samuel predicts the Spirit's empowerment of Israel's first king. The Hebrew 'tsalach' (come upon) implies a rushing or overwhelming force, the same word used of Samson (Judges 14:6, 19; 15:14). Unlike the permanent indwelling believers experience under the New Covenant, Old Testament Spirit empowerment was typically temporary and task-specific. The phrase 'turned into another man' (nehepakta le'ish acher) indicates genuine transformation, not mere external change. This raises profound questions about Saul's later apostasy: how could one so transformed fall so far? Reformed theology recognizes that powerful spiritual experiences do not guarantee persevering faith; only God's electing grace preserves His chosen ones. Saul's prophesying authenticated his divine calling publicly, yet his subsequent history warns that spiritual gifts are not evidence of saving grace.
And let it be, when these signs are come unto thee, that thou do as occasion serve thee; for God is with thee. And: Heb. And it shall come to pass, that when these signs, etc that: Heb. do for thee as thine hand shall find
View commentary
And let it be, when these signs are come unto thee, that thou do as occasion serve thee; for God is with thee.
Samuel's instruction 'do as occasion serve thee' translates the Hebrew 'aseh leka asher timtsa yadeka' - literally, 'do for yourself what your hand finds.' This grants Saul significant freedom to act according to circumstances as they arise. The foundation for such liberty is the assuring promise: 'God is with thee' (ha'elohim immak). This covenantal formula echoes God's promises to the patriarchs and later to David. It indicates divine presence, protection, and empowerment for the tasks ahead. However, this freedom operates within bounds Samuel will shortly specify (verse 8). The tension between Spirit-led initiative and prophetic instruction would become the testing ground for Saul's kingship. His failure to wait for Samuel at Gilgal (chapter 13) demonstrates the danger of presuming upon this freedom without maintaining proper boundaries of authority and obedience.
Samuel's instruction 'do as occasion serve thee' translates the Hebrew 'aseh leka asher timtsa yadeka' - literally, 'do for yourself what your hand finds.' This grants Saul significant freedom to act according to circumstances as they arise. The foundation for such liberty is the assuring promise: 'God is with thee' (ha'elohim immak). This covenantal formula echoes God's promises to the patriarchs and later to David. It indicates divine presence, protection, and empowerment for the tasks ahead. However, this freedom operates within bounds Samuel will shortly specify (verse 8). The tension between Spirit-led initiative and prophetic instruction would become the testing ground for Saul's kingship. His failure to wait for Samuel at Gilgal (chapter 13) demonstrates the danger of presuming upon this freedom without maintaining proper boundaries of authority and obedience.
And thou shalt go down before me to Gilgal; and, behold, I will come down unto thee, to offer burnt offerings, and to sacrifice sacrifices of peace offerings: seven days shalt thou tarry, till I come to thee, and shew thee what thou shalt do.
View commentary
And thou shalt go down before me to Gilgal; and, behold, I will come down unto thee, to offer burnt offerings, and to sacrifice sacrifices of peace offerings: seven days shalt thou tarry, till I come to thee, and shew thee what thou shalt do.
This verse establishes the critical test that Saul would later fail catastrophically (1 Samuel 13). The command is precise: go to Gilgal, wait seven days for Samuel to arrive, and then receive further instruction. Gilgal, near Jericho, held profound significance as Israel's first camp after crossing the Jordan and the site of circumcision renewal (Joshua 5). The burnt offerings (olot) represented complete consecration, while peace offerings (zevachim shelamim) signified fellowship with God. Crucially, Samuel - not Saul - would offer these sacrifices. The distinction between royal and priestly functions was absolute in Israel, unlike surrounding nations where kings served as priest-kings. This command tested whether Saul would submit to theocratic order, honoring the boundary between political and spiritual authority. His later impatience revealed a heart that valued expedience over obedience.
This verse establishes the critical test that Saul would later fail catastrophically (1 Samuel 13). The command is precise: go to Gilgal, wait seven days for Samuel to arrive, and then receive further instruction. Gilgal, near Jericho, held profound significance as Israel's first camp after crossing the Jordan and the site of circumcision renewal (Joshua 5). The burnt offerings (olot) represented complete consecration, while peace offerings (zevachim shelamim) signified fellowship with God. Crucially, Samuel - not Saul - would offer these sacrifices. The distinction between royal and priestly functions was absolute in Israel, unlike surrounding nations where kings served as priest-kings. This command tested whether Saul would submit to theocratic order, honoring the boundary between political and spiritual authority. His later impatience revealed a heart that valued expedience over obedience.
And it was so, that when he had turned his back to go from Samuel, God gave him another heart: and all those signs came to pass that day. back: Heb. shoulder gave: Heb. turned
View commentary
And it was so, that when he had turned his back to go from Samuel, God gave him another heart: and all those signs came to pass that day.
The Hebrew 'haphak lev acher' (gave him another heart) indicates a genuine divine work of transformation. The verb 'haphak' means to turn, overturn, or transform completely. This is not merely outward change but internal renewal enabling Saul for his calling. Yet this transformation, however real, differs from the regeneration described in Ezekiel 36:26 and the New Testament. Saul received capacity for royal service, not necessarily a new nature in the soteriological sense. The immediate fulfillment of all three signs 'that day' (bayom hahu) validated Samuel's prophetic authority and confirmed God's choice of Saul. This condensed timeline of divine orchestration demonstrates God's complete sovereignty over circumstances and people. The signs were not magic but divine appointments - God arranging His world to communicate His purposes to His chosen servant.
The Hebrew 'haphak lev acher' (gave him another heart) indicates a genuine divine work of transformation. The verb 'haphak' means to turn, overturn, or transform completely. This is not merely outward change but internal renewal enabling Saul for his calling. Yet this transformation, however real, differs from the regeneration described in Ezekiel 36:26 and the New Testament. Saul received capacity for royal service, not necessarily a new nature in the soteriological sense. The immediate fulfillment of all three signs 'that day' (bayom hahu) validated Samuel's prophetic authority and confirmed God's choice of Saul. This condensed timeline of divine orchestration demonstrates God's complete sovereignty over circumstances and people. The signs were not magic but divine appointments - God arranging His world to communicate His purposes to His chosen servant.
And when they came thither to the hill, behold, a company of prophets met him; and the Spirit of God came upon him, and he prophesied among them.
View commentary
And when they came thither to the hill, behold, a company of prophets met him; and the Spirit of God came upon him, and he prophesied among them.
The third sign's fulfillment marks Saul's public spiritual authentication. The Hebrew 'ruach elohim' (Spirit of God) explicitly identifies the source of his prophetic experience. The term 'prophesied' (yitnabbei') in the hithpael form suggests reflexive or habitual action - he was prophesying among them, participating fully in their ecstatic worship. This corporate prophetic experience integrated Saul into Israel's spiritual leadership before his political elevation. The Spirit's coming demonstrated that kingship in Israel was fundamentally spiritual, not merely political. Yet the text's emphasis on external manifestation (prophesying) rather than internal fruit (righteousness, justice) foreshadows a pattern in Saul's life: dramatic spiritual experiences without corresponding character transformation. The Spirit who enabled prophesying would later depart when Saul persisted in disobedience (16:14), demonstrating that charismatic gifts depend on continued obedience.
The third sign's fulfillment marks Saul's public spiritual authentication. The Hebrew 'ruach elohim' (Spirit of God) explicitly identifies the source of his prophetic experience. The term 'prophesied' (yitnabbei') in the hithpael form suggests reflexive or habitual action - he was prophesying among them, participating fully in their ecstatic worship. This corporate prophetic experience integrated Saul into Israel's spiritual leadership before his political elevation. The Spirit's coming demonstrated that kingship in Israel was fundamentally spiritual, not merely political. Yet the text's emphasis on external manifestation (prophesying) rather than internal fruit (righteousness, justice) foreshadows a pattern in Saul's life: dramatic spiritual experiences without corresponding character transformation. The Spirit who enabled prophesying would later depart when Saul persisted in disobedience (16:14), demonstrating that charismatic gifts depend on continued obedience.
And it came to pass, when all that knew him beforetime saw that, behold, he prophesied among the prophets, then the people said one to another, What is this that is come unto the son of Kish? Is Saul also among the prophets? one: Heb. a man to his neighbour
View commentary
And it came to pass, when all that knew him beforetime saw that, behold, he prophesied among the prophets, then the people said one to another, What is this that is come unto the son of Kish? Is Saul also among the prophets?
The neighbors' astonishment reveals their perception of Saul before his transformation. The question 'What is this that is come unto' (mah-zeh hayah le) expresses bewildered amazement. 'The son of Kish' identifies Saul by his father's name, emphasizing his ordinary family background with no prophetic lineage. The question 'Is Saul also among the prophets?' (hagam Sha'ul banevi'im) became a proverb in Israel (verse 12; 19:24). This phrase could express genuine wonder at God's transforming power or skeptical dismissal - the grammar allows either reading. Such ambiguity mirrors responses to God's work throughout history: some see transformation as evidence of grace, others as incongruent with a person's known character. The question unwittingly prophesies Saul's conflicted identity: he would stand among the prophets yet persecute David whom the prophets protected.
The neighbors' astonishment reveals their perception of Saul before his transformation. The question 'What is this that is come unto' (mah-zeh hayah le) expresses bewildered amazement. 'The son of Kish' identifies Saul by his father's name, emphasizing his ordinary family background with no prophetic lineage. The question 'Is Saul also among the prophets?' (hagam Sha'ul banevi'im) became a proverb in Israel (verse 12; 19:24). This phrase could express genuine wonder at God's transforming power or skeptical dismissal - the grammar allows either reading. Such ambiguity mirrors responses to God's work throughout history: some see transformation as evidence of grace, others as incongruent with a person's known character. The question unwittingly prophesies Saul's conflicted identity: he would stand among the prophets yet persecute David whom the prophets protected.
And one of the same place answered and said, But who is their father? Therefore it became a proverb, Is Saul also among the prophets? of: Heb. from thence
View commentary
And one of the same place answered and said, But who is their father? Therefore it became a proverb, Is Saul also among the prophets?
This enigmatic response 'who is their father?' has generated much scholarly discussion. The question likely redirects attention from Saul's natural parentage to his spiritual calling. Just as the prophets' authority came not from physical descent but from divine calling, so too Saul's new role transcended his family origins. The 'father' of the prophets was God Himself, or perhaps Samuel as their spiritual leader. This response subtly affirms that spiritual gifts derive from God's sovereign bestowal, not hereditary qualification. The phrase becoming a proverb (mashal) indicates its enduring significance in Israel's memory. Proverbs crystallize wisdom from experience, and this saying captured the truth that God can radically transform anyone for His purposes. Yet proverbs can carry double meanings: the same phrase later expressed shocked disillusionment when the king-turned-persecutor lay naked and prophesying (19:24).
This enigmatic response 'who is their father?' has generated much scholarly discussion. The question likely redirects attention from Saul's natural parentage to his spiritual calling. Just as the prophets' authority came not from physical descent but from divine calling, so too Saul's new role transcended his family origins. The 'father' of the prophets was God Himself, or perhaps Samuel as their spiritual leader. This response subtly affirms that spiritual gifts derive from God's sovereign bestowal, not hereditary qualification. The phrase becoming a proverb (mashal) indicates its enduring significance in Israel's memory. Proverbs crystallize wisdom from experience, and this saying captured the truth that God can radically transform anyone for His purposes. Yet proverbs can carry double meanings: the same phrase later expressed shocked disillusionment when the king-turned-persecutor lay naked and prophesying (19:24).
And when he had made an end of prophesying, he came to the high place.
View commentary
And when he had made an end of prophesying, he came to the high place.
This brief transitional verse carries subtle significance. The prophesying 'made an end' (kalah) - it was a discrete experience, not a permanent state. Saul's charismatic encounter with the Spirit concluded, and normal life resumed. This pattern characterizes Old Testament Spirit empowerment: powerful but episodic, enabling specific tasks rather than producing permanent transformation. The 'high place' (bamah) was likely Gibeah's worship site where the prophetic company had descended from. Saul's proceeding there suggests he joined in proper worship following his prophetic experience, an appropriate response. High places were legitimate worship sites before the temple's construction, though they later became associated with syncretism. That Saul moved from ecstatic experience to ordered worship models the proper sequence: spiritual encounters should lead to regular discipleship, not replace it.
This brief transitional verse carries subtle significance. The prophesying 'made an end' (kalah) - it was a discrete experience, not a permanent state. Saul's charismatic encounter with the Spirit concluded, and normal life resumed. This pattern characterizes Old Testament Spirit empowerment: powerful but episodic, enabling specific tasks rather than producing permanent transformation. The 'high place' (bamah) was likely Gibeah's worship site where the prophetic company had descended from. Saul's proceeding there suggests he joined in proper worship following his prophetic experience, an appropriate response. High places were legitimate worship sites before the temple's construction, though they later became associated with syncretism. That Saul moved from ecstatic experience to ordered worship models the proper sequence: spiritual encounters should lead to regular discipleship, not replace it.
And Saul's uncle said unto him and to his servant, Whither went ye? And he said, To seek the asses: and when we saw that they were no where, we came to Samuel.
View commentary
And Saul's uncle said unto him and to his servant, Whither went ye? And he said, To seek the asses: and when we saw that they were no where, we came to Samuel.
The inquiry from Saul's uncle introduces a test of discretion. Saul mentions the donkeys and consulting Samuel but withholds the matter of the kingdom. His partial answer is technically true but strategically incomplete. The Hebrew construction presents straightforward narrative: 'to seek the donkeys... we came to Samuel.' The uncle's question 'whither' (anah) seeks itinerary information, which Saul provides. Whether this reticence reflects humble obedience to Samuel's implicit instruction, appropriate discretion about unconfirmed matters, or the beginning of Saul's pattern of selective disclosure is debated. Given the immediate context of his transformation, discretion seems the most charitable reading. Yet Saul's later tendency toward secrecy and paranoia may find its earliest seed here. Wisdom requires knowing when to speak and when to remain silent; Saul's silence here appears appropriate.
The inquiry from Saul's uncle introduces a test of discretion. Saul mentions the donkeys and consulting Samuel but withholds the matter of the kingdom. His partial answer is technically true but strategically incomplete. The Hebrew construction presents straightforward narrative: 'to seek the donkeys... we came to Samuel.' The uncle's question 'whither' (anah) seeks itinerary information, which Saul provides. Whether this reticence reflects humble obedience to Samuel's implicit instruction, appropriate discretion about unconfirmed matters, or the beginning of Saul's pattern of selective disclosure is debated. Given the immediate context of his transformation, discretion seems the most charitable reading. Yet Saul's later tendency toward secrecy and paranoia may find its earliest seed here. Wisdom requires knowing when to speak and when to remain silent; Saul's silence here appears appropriate.
And Saul's uncle said, Tell me, I pray thee, what Samuel said unto you.
View commentary
And Saul's uncle said, Tell me, I pray thee, what Samuel said unto you.
The uncle's persistent inquiry 'tell me, I pray thee' (haggidah-na li) uses the emphatic particle 'na,' intensifying his request. He presses beyond the journey's itinerary to the substance of Samuel's message. This pressure tested Saul's discretion. Samuel was not merely a local seer but Israel's prophetic leader; any message from him carried national significance. The uncle's curiosity was natural, perhaps even anxious - what counsel had the prophet given his nephew? Yet some matters between God's prophet and God's chosen are not for public disclosure until God's timing reveals them. Jesus similarly instructed disciples to tell no one about certain revelations until the appropriate time (Matthew 17:9). The question also foreshadows how Saul would later be scrutinized: kings live under constant observation, their words and actions publicly evaluated.
The uncle's persistent inquiry 'tell me, I pray thee' (haggidah-na li) uses the emphatic particle 'na,' intensifying his request. He presses beyond the journey's itinerary to the substance of Samuel's message. This pressure tested Saul's discretion. Samuel was not merely a local seer but Israel's prophetic leader; any message from him carried national significance. The uncle's curiosity was natural, perhaps even anxious - what counsel had the prophet given his nephew? Yet some matters between God's prophet and God's chosen are not for public disclosure until God's timing reveals them. Jesus similarly instructed disciples to tell no one about certain revelations until the appropriate time (Matthew 17:9). The question also foreshadows how Saul would later be scrutinized: kings live under constant observation, their words and actions publicly evaluated.
And Saul said unto his uncle, He told us plainly that the asses were found. But of the matter of the kingdom, whereof Samuel spake, he told him not.
View commentary
And Saul said unto his uncle, He told us plainly that the asses were found. But of the matter of the kingdom, whereof Samuel spake, he told him not.
Saul's response reveals measured discretion: he shares one truth while withholding another. The phrase 'told us plainly' (higgid higgid) uses emphatic doubling to stress certainty about the donkeys. The matter of the kingdom (davar hammelukah) - literally 'the word/matter of the kingship' - remained unspoken. The narrator's editorial comment ensures readers understand Saul's silence was deliberate, not accidental. This discretion likely reflects obedience to Samuel's implicit guidance and appropriate humility before public confirmation. Saul did not presume upon God's private revelation by announcing himself king. Compare this restraint to his later impulsive actions. Early Saul demonstrated virtues - discretion, humility, patient waiting - that his later self tragically abandoned. The contrast between this self-controlled response and his eventual paranoid tyranny marks one of Scripture's most sobering character trajectories.
Saul's response reveals measured discretion: he shares one truth while withholding another. The phrase 'told us plainly' (higgid higgid) uses emphatic doubling to stress certainty about the donkeys. The matter of the kingdom (davar hammelukah) - literally 'the word/matter of the kingship' - remained unspoken. The narrator's editorial comment ensures readers understand Saul's silence was deliberate, not accidental. This discretion likely reflects obedience to Samuel's implicit guidance and appropriate humility before public confirmation. Saul did not presume upon God's private revelation by announcing himself king. Compare this restraint to his later impulsive actions. Early Saul demonstrated virtues - discretion, humility, patient waiting - that his later self tragically abandoned. The contrast between this self-controlled response and his eventual paranoid tyranny marks one of Scripture's most sobering character trajectories.
Saul Chosen by Lot
And Samuel called the people together unto the LORD to Mizpeh;
View commentary
And Samuel called the people together unto the LORD to Mizpeh;
Samuel's convocation at Mizpah (Mitzpah, meaning 'watchtower') shifts from private anointing to public selection. The phrase 'unto the LORD' (el-YHWH) emphasizes the sacred, covenantal nature of this assembly - it was not merely political convention but religious convocation. Mizpah held significant history: Jacob and Laban made their covenant there (Genesis 31:49); Israel assembled there during the Benjamite civil war (Judges 20-21); and Samuel previously gathered Israel there for repentance and deliverance from Philistines (1 Samuel 7:5-6). This continuity of sacred space underscored that establishing monarchy occurred within, not apart from, Israel's covenant relationship with Yahweh. Samuel, as prophet and judge, possessed the authority to summon all Israel. The gathering's purpose would be to confirm through lot-casting what God had already revealed privately - a pattern showing that divine sovereignty works through human processes.
Samuel's convocation at Mizpah (Mitzpah, meaning 'watchtower') shifts from private anointing to public selection. The phrase 'unto the LORD' (el-YHWH) emphasizes the sacred, covenantal nature of this assembly - it was not merely political convention but religious convocation. Mizpah held significant history: Jacob and Laban made their covenant there (Genesis 31:49); Israel assembled there during the Benjamite civil war (Judges 20-21); and Samuel previously gathered Israel there for repentance and deliverance from Philistines (1 Samuel 7:5-6). This continuity of sacred space underscored that establishing monarchy occurred within, not apart from, Israel's covenant relationship with Yahweh. Samuel, as prophet and judge, possessed the authority to summon all Israel. The gathering's purpose would be to confirm through lot-casting what God had already revealed privately - a pattern showing that divine sovereignty works through human processes.
And said unto the children of Israel, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, I brought up Israel out of Egypt, and delivered you out of the hand of the Egyptians, and out of the hand of all kingdoms, and of them that oppressed you:
View commentary
And said unto the children of Israel, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, I brought up Israel out of Egypt, and delivered you out of the hand of the Egyptians, and out of the hand of all kingdoms, and of them that oppressed you:
Samuel begins with the prophetic messenger formula 'Thus saith the LORD' (koh amar YHWH), establishing divine authority for his words. He rehearses Israel's redemptive history: the Exodus ('brought up from Egypt'), ongoing deliverance ('out of the hand of the Egyptians'), and continued salvation from 'all kingdoms' and oppressors throughout the judges period. This historical recitation (historical prologue) follows ancient covenant patterns where God's saving acts established the basis for Israel's obligations. The verb 'brought up' (he'eleti) implies more than geographical movement; it speaks of elevation, rescue, and purposeful deliverance. By grounding the kingship discussion in Exodus memory, Samuel frames Israel's request against God's faithful record. The implied question hangs in the air: given all God has done, why do you want a human king?
Samuel begins with the prophetic messenger formula 'Thus saith the LORD' (koh amar YHWH), establishing divine authority for his words. He rehearses Israel's redemptive history: the Exodus ('brought up from Egypt'), ongoing deliverance ('out of the hand of the Egyptians'), and continued salvation from 'all kingdoms' and oppressors throughout the judges period. This historical recitation (historical prologue) follows ancient covenant patterns where God's saving acts established the basis for Israel's obligations. The verb 'brought up' (he'eleti) implies more than geographical movement; it speaks of elevation, rescue, and purposeful deliverance. By grounding the kingship discussion in Exodus memory, Samuel frames Israel's request against God's faithful record. The implied question hangs in the air: given all God has done, why do you want a human king?
And ye have this day rejected your God, who himself saved you out of all your adversities and your tribulations; and ye have said unto him, Nay, but set a king over us. Now therefore present yourselves before the LORD by your tribes, and by your thousands.
View commentary
And ye have this day rejected your God, who himself saved you out of all your adversities and your tribulations; and ye have said unto him, Nay, but set a king over us. Now therefore present yourselves before the LORD by your tribes, and by your thousands.
Samuel's prophetic indictment is severe: requesting a king constituted rejecting God (ma'as, a strong term implying spurning or despising). The emphatic 'who himself' (hu asher) stresses God's personal agency in their deliverance - not distant providence but direct intervention. Their response to such salvation was 'Nay' (lo'), a flat contradiction. The word for 'adversities' (ra'ot) and 'tribulations' (tsarot) encompasses the full range of distresses God had resolved. Yet despite this indictment, God proceeds with the selection - demonstrating how He works even through sinful human choices. The command to 'present yourselves' (hityatsvu) by tribes and thousands (military units of 1,000) follows the organizational structure of the wilderness generation, connecting this moment to covenantal assembly patterns. God's anger does not prevent His gracious accommodation to human weakness.
Samuel's prophetic indictment is severe: requesting a king constituted rejecting God (ma'as, a strong term implying spurning or despising). The emphatic 'who himself' (hu asher) stresses God's personal agency in their deliverance - not distant providence but direct intervention. Their response to such salvation was 'Nay' (lo'), a flat contradiction. The word for 'adversities' (ra'ot) and 'tribulations' (tsarot) encompasses the full range of distresses God had resolved. Yet despite this indictment, God proceeds with the selection - demonstrating how He works even through sinful human choices. The command to 'present yourselves' (hityatsvu) by tribes and thousands (military units of 1,000) follows the organizational structure of the wilderness generation, connecting this moment to covenantal assembly patterns. God's anger does not prevent His gracious accommodation to human weakness.
And when Samuel had caused all the tribes of Israel to come near, the tribe of Benjamin was taken.
View commentary
And when Samuel had caused all the tribes of Israel to come near, the tribe of Benjamin was taken.
The selection by lot begins with tribal level identification. The Hebrew 'laqad' (taken/caught) is the same word used for capturing prey or enemies, suggesting the lot 'seized' Benjamin from among the tribes. Casting lots was Israel's sanctioned method for discerning God's will in specific decisions (Proverbs 16:33: 'The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD'). The selection of Benjamin - Israel's smallest tribe, nearly annihilated in the civil war of Judges 19-21 - demonstrated God's pattern of choosing the weak and unlikely. Benjamin's territory between powerful Ephraim and Judah made them politically neutral, potentially acceptable to tribal factions. Jacob's blessing had called Benjamin a 'ravenous wolf' (Genesis 49:27); Saul's initial military success would fulfill this characterization before his tragic decline.
The selection by lot begins with tribal level identification. The Hebrew 'laqad' (taken/caught) is the same word used for capturing prey or enemies, suggesting the lot 'seized' Benjamin from among the tribes. Casting lots was Israel's sanctioned method for discerning God's will in specific decisions (Proverbs 16:33: 'The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the LORD'). The selection of Benjamin - Israel's smallest tribe, nearly annihilated in the civil war of Judges 19-21 - demonstrated God's pattern of choosing the weak and unlikely. Benjamin's territory between powerful Ephraim and Judah made them politically neutral, potentially acceptable to tribal factions. Jacob's blessing had called Benjamin a 'ravenous wolf' (Genesis 49:27); Saul's initial military success would fulfill this characterization before his tragic decline.
When he had caused the tribe of Benjamin to come near by their families, the family of Matri was taken, and Saul the son of Kish was taken: and when they sought him, he could not be found.
View commentary
When he had caused the tribe of Benjamin to come near by their families, the family of Matri was taken, and Saul the son of Kish was taken: and when they sought him, he could not be found.
The selection progressively narrows: tribe to family (mishpachah, clan) to individual. The family of Matri, otherwise unknown, suggests Saul came from no distinguished lineage despite his father Kish being a 'mighty man of power' (9:1). When the lot definitively identified 'Saul the son of Kish,' the chosen one could not be found (lo nimtsa). This disappearance creates dramatic tension: God's clearly revealed choice is absent at his moment of presentation. The passive construction 'could not be found' leaves ambiguity - was he hiding intentionally, providentially delayed, or simply elsewhere? The Hebrew phrasing emphasizes the search's failure: they 'sought' (baqash) but he 'was not found.' This absence at coronation foreshadows Saul's spiritual trajectory: present for dramatic moments but absent when faithful presence was required.
The selection progressively narrows: tribe to family (mishpachah, clan) to individual. The family of Matri, otherwise unknown, suggests Saul came from no distinguished lineage despite his father Kish being a 'mighty man of power' (9:1). When the lot definitively identified 'Saul the son of Kish,' the chosen one could not be found (lo nimtsa). This disappearance creates dramatic tension: God's clearly revealed choice is absent at his moment of presentation. The passive construction 'could not be found' leaves ambiguity - was he hiding intentionally, providentially delayed, or simply elsewhere? The Hebrew phrasing emphasizes the search's failure: they 'sought' (baqash) but he 'was not found.' This absence at coronation foreshadows Saul's spiritual trajectory: present for dramatic moments but absent when faithful presence was required.
Therefore they enquired of the LORD further, if the man should yet come thither. And the LORD answered, Behold, he hath hid himself among the stuff.
View commentary
Therefore they enquired of the LORD further, if the man should yet come thither. And the LORD answered, Behold, he hath hid himself among the stuff.
The assembly's response to Saul's absence was to seek the LORD further (sha'al od ba-YHWH), demonstrating proper dependence on divine guidance. The verb 'sha'al' (inquired) puns on Saul's name (Sha'ul, 'asked for'), creating wordplay throughout his narrative. God's answer is startlingly specific: 'Behold, he hath hid himself among the stuff' (kelim, baggage or equipment). This divine omniscience - knowing precisely where a hiding man conceals himself - displays God's exhaustive knowledge. Whether Saul's hiding reflected genuine humility (a farmer overwhelmed by kingship), fear of responsibility, or early signs of emotional instability remains debated. The contrast with later Saul is sharp: here he hides from honor; later he relentlessly pursues David to protect his honor. God's answer is neither condemnatory nor commendatory; it simply locates His chosen servant.
The assembly's response to Saul's absence was to seek the LORD further (sha'al od ba-YHWH), demonstrating proper dependence on divine guidance. The verb 'sha'al' (inquired) puns on Saul's name (Sha'ul, 'asked for'), creating wordplay throughout his narrative. God's answer is startlingly specific: 'Behold, he hath hid himself among the stuff' (kelim, baggage or equipment). This divine omniscience - knowing precisely where a hiding man conceals himself - displays God's exhaustive knowledge. Whether Saul's hiding reflected genuine humility (a farmer overwhelmed by kingship), fear of responsibility, or early signs of emotional instability remains debated. The contrast with later Saul is sharp: here he hides from honor; later he relentlessly pursues David to protect his honor. God's answer is neither condemnatory nor commendatory; it simply locates His chosen servant.
And they ran and fetched him thence: and when he stood among the people, he was higher than any of the people from his shoulders and upward.
View commentary
And they ran and fetched him thence: and when he stood among the people, he was higher than any of the people from his shoulders and upward.
The people 'ran' (ruts) to retrieve Saul, suggesting eager excitement at discovering their king. When presented, his physical stature immediately distinguished him: 'higher than any of the people from his shoulders and upward' (gavoah mikol-ha'am mishikmo vamalah). This impressive appearance fulfills Israel's desire for a king 'like the nations' (8:5, 20) - outwardly impressive, visually commanding. Samuel earlier warned that Israel evaluated by external appearance (16:7: 'man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart'). Saul's height satisfied human expectations but did not guarantee internal qualification. This physical description foreshadows the Goliath narrative where another exceptionally tall figure would terrify Israel - including Saul, who should have been their champion. Physical impressiveness without spiritual courage proves worthless against true threats.
The people 'ran' (ruts) to retrieve Saul, suggesting eager excitement at discovering their king. When presented, his physical stature immediately distinguished him: 'higher than any of the people from his shoulders and upward' (gavoah mikol-ha'am mishikmo vamalah). This impressive appearance fulfills Israel's desire for a king 'like the nations' (8:5, 20) - outwardly impressive, visually commanding. Samuel earlier warned that Israel evaluated by external appearance (16:7: 'man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart'). Saul's height satisfied human expectations but did not guarantee internal qualification. This physical description foreshadows the Goliath narrative where another exceptionally tall figure would terrify Israel - including Saul, who should have been their champion. Physical impressiveness without spiritual courage proves worthless against true threats.
And Samuel said to all the people, See ye him whom the LORD hath chosen, that there is none like him among all the people? And all the people shouted, and said, God save the king. God: Heb. Let the king live
View commentary
And Samuel said to all the people, See ye him whom the LORD hath chosen, that there is none like him among all the people? And all the people shouted, and said, God save the king.
Samuel's presentation uses emphatic language: 'See ye' (hare'item) commands visual attention; 'whom the LORD hath chosen' (bachar YHWH) affirms divine election; 'none like him' (ein kamohu) declares uniqueness. The phrase 'among all the people' creates irony - uniqueness based on physical height, not spiritual stature. The acclamation 'God save the king' (yechi hammelek) literally means 'Let the king live!' This Hebrew expression became the standard coronation formula, echoing through Israel's royal history. The 'shouting' (ruah) connotes a loud cry of acclamation, sometimes used for battle cries or worship shouts. This moment of unified celebration would prove fleeting; before chapter's end, 'children of Belial' despised Saul (v. 27). The people's initial enthusiasm parallels many who receive the gospel joyfully but fall away (Matthew 13:20-21).
Samuel's presentation uses emphatic language: 'See ye' (hare'item) commands visual attention; 'whom the LORD hath chosen' (bachar YHWH) affirms divine election; 'none like him' (ein kamohu) declares uniqueness. The phrase 'among all the people' creates irony - uniqueness based on physical height, not spiritual stature. The acclamation 'God save the king' (yechi hammelek) literally means 'Let the king live!' This Hebrew expression became the standard coronation formula, echoing through Israel's royal history. The 'shouting' (ruah) connotes a loud cry of acclamation, sometimes used for battle cries or worship shouts. This moment of unified celebration would prove fleeting; before chapter's end, 'children of Belial' despised Saul (v. 27). The people's initial enthusiasm parallels many who receive the gospel joyfully but fall away (Matthew 13:20-21).
Then Samuel told the people the manner of the kingdom, and wrote it in a book, and laid it up before the LORD. And Samuel sent all the people away, every man to his house.
View commentary
Then Samuel told the people the manner of the kingdom, and wrote it in a book, and laid it up before the LORD. Then Samuel sent all the people away, every man to his house.
Samuel formally establishes constitutional boundaries by declaring 'the manner of the kingdom' (mishpat hammelukah). This 'manner' or 'judgment' likely expanded upon the royal regulations of Deuteronomy 17:14-20, which limited royal acquisition of horses, wives, and wealth while requiring personal Torah study. Writing these regulations 'in a book' (sepher) and placing them 'before the LORD' created covenant documentation, witnessed by God Himself in His sanctuary. This act constitutionalized the monarchy: Israelite kingship would be limited, regulated, and accountable to divine law. The dismissal 'every man to his house' concludes the formal assembly while anticipating the narrative of the 'worthless fellows' who rejected Saul. Samuel's constitutional work attempted to prevent the abuses he had warned about (8:11-18), though subsequent history would show how rarely kings honored these limits.
Samuel formally establishes constitutional boundaries by declaring 'the manner of the kingdom' (mishpat hammelukah). This 'manner' or 'judgment' likely expanded upon the royal regulations of Deuteronomy 17:14-20, which limited royal acquisition of horses, wives, and wealth while requiring personal Torah study. Writing these regulations 'in a book' (sepher) and placing them 'before the LORD' created covenant documentation, witnessed by God Himself in His sanctuary. This act constitutionalized the monarchy: Israelite kingship would be limited, regulated, and accountable to divine law. The dismissal 'every man to his house' concludes the formal assembly while anticipating the narrative of the 'worthless fellows' who rejected Saul. Samuel's constitutional work attempted to prevent the abuses he had warned about (8:11-18), though subsequent history would show how rarely kings honored these limits.
And Saul also went home to Gibeah; and there went with him a band of men, whose hearts God had touched.
View commentary
And Saul also went home to Gibeah; and there went with him a band of men, whose hearts God had touched.
Saul returns to Gibeah, his hometown and future capital, accompanied by divinely motivated supporters. The phrase 'whose hearts God had touched' (nega elohim belibam) indicates supernatural influence producing loyalty. The verb 'touched' (nega) implies a gentle contact - God did not compel but inclined these hearts toward Saul. This 'band of men' (chayil, also meaning army or force) formed the nucleus of Saul's administration. God's provision of loyal supporters demonstrates His genuine investment in Saul's success; the king was not set up for failure but supplied with every resource for faithful rule. The reference to 'hearts' creates thematic resonance with verse 9 (Saul's changed heart) and the later contrast with David, a man after God's own heart. Hearts feature prominently in Saul's narrative, tracking the inner dimension of his tragic decline.
Saul returns to Gibeah, his hometown and future capital, accompanied by divinely motivated supporters. The phrase 'whose hearts God had touched' (nega elohim belibam) indicates supernatural influence producing loyalty. The verb 'touched' (nega) implies a gentle contact - God did not compel but inclined these hearts toward Saul. This 'band of men' (chayil, also meaning army or force) formed the nucleus of Saul's administration. God's provision of loyal supporters demonstrates His genuine investment in Saul's success; the king was not set up for failure but supplied with every resource for faithful rule. The reference to 'hearts' creates thematic resonance with verse 9 (Saul's changed heart) and the later contrast with David, a man after God's own heart. Hearts feature prominently in Saul's narrative, tracking the inner dimension of his tragic decline.
But the children of Belial said, How shall this man save us? And they despised him, and brought him no presents. But he held his peace. held: or, was as though he had been deaf
View commentary
But the children of Belial said, How shall this man save us? And they despised him, and brought him no presents. But he held his peace.
The chapter concludes with immediate opposition from 'children of Belial' (benei beliya'al) - literally 'sons of worthlessness,' a Hebrew idiom for thoroughly wicked individuals. Their contemptuous question 'How shall this man save us?' (mah-yoshienu zeh) challenges both Saul's capacity and God's selection. Withholding customary gifts (minchah, tribute or present) constituted political rejection of his authority. Yet Saul's response - 'he held his peace' (vayehi kemaacharish, literally 'he was as one being silent') - demonstrates remarkable restraint. This self-control contrasts sharply with his later violent reactions to perceived slights. Early Saul could absorb insult without retaliation; later Saul would slaughter an entire priestly city for suspected disloyalty. The presence of opposition from day one shows that even God-chosen leaders face rejection; success depends not on universal approval but on faithful obedience to divine calling.
The chapter concludes with immediate opposition from 'children of Belial' (benei beliya'al) - literally 'sons of worthlessness,' a Hebrew idiom for thoroughly wicked individuals. Their contemptuous question 'How shall this man save us?' (mah-yoshienu zeh) challenges both Saul's capacity and God's selection. Withholding customary gifts (minchah, tribute or present) constituted political rejection of his authority. Yet Saul's response - 'he held his peace' (vayehi kemaacharish, literally 'he was as one being silent') - demonstrates remarkable restraint. This self-control contrasts sharply with his later violent reactions to perceived slights. Early Saul could absorb insult without retaliation; later Saul would slaughter an entire priestly city for suspected disloyalty. The presence of opposition from day one shows that even God-chosen leaders face rejection; success depends not on universal approval but on faithful obedience to divine calling.