King James Version
1 Samuel 11
15 verses with commentary
Saul Defeats the Ammonites
Then Nahash the Ammonite came up, and encamped against Jabeshgilead : and all the men of Jabesh said unto Nahash, Make a covenant with us, and we will serve thee.
View commentary
Nahash ('serpent' in Hebrew) exemplifies the hostile forces arrayed against God's covenant people. His siege of Jabesh-gilead, a town in Transjordan with close ties to the tribe of Benjamin (Judges 21:8-14), creates a crisis that will prove Saul's fitness for kingship. The men of Jabesh propose vassalage rather than death, revealing the desperate spiritual and military condition of Israel. Their willingness to 'serve' (abad) a foreign oppressor stands in stark contrast to their calling to serve the LORD alone.
And Nahash the Ammonite answered them, On this condition will I make a covenant with you, that I may thrust out all your right eyes, and lay it for a reproach upon all Israel.
View commentary
Nahash's demand to gouge out every right eye served dual purposes: marking them permanently as conquered vassals and rendering them militarily useless, since ancient warriors held shields with their left hands, covering the left eye while aiming with the right. His intent to bring 'reproach upon all Israel' reveals this was not merely local aggression but a calculated assault on the covenant community's honor and their God's reputation. The Hebrew word cherpah (reproach) carries connotations of spiritual disgrace.
And the elders of Jabesh said unto him, Give us seven days' respite, that we may send messengers unto all the coasts of Israel: and then, if there be no man to save us, we will come out to thee. Give: Heb. Forbear us
View commentary
The elders' request for seven days reveals both their desperate straits and, remarkably, Nahash's overconfidence. That he grants this respite suggests his certainty that no help would come - a miscalculation rooted in his underestimation of Israel's God. The appeal to 'all the coasts of Israel' represents a final desperate hope that the scattered tribes might unite. This moment exposes the fundamental weakness of the pre-monarchical period: no central authority existed to coordinate national defense.
Then came the messengers to Gibeah of Saul, and told the tidings in the ears of the people: and all the people lifted up their voices, and wept.
View commentary
The messengers arrive at Gibeah, Saul's hometown and the future capital of his kingdom. That the people 'lifted up their voices and wept' indicates both deep compassion for their kinsmen and fear of their own vulnerability. The corporate weeping represents a spontaneous national mourning that sets the stage for divine intervention. God often moves His people to grief before granting deliverance, preparing hearts to recognize that salvation comes from Him alone.
And, behold, Saul came after the herd out of the field; and Saul said, What aileth the people that they weep? And they told him the tidings of the men of Jabesh.
View commentary
The detail that Saul 'came after the herd out of the field' emphasizes his humble circumstances despite his anointing. He had not yet assumed royal duties but continued his ordinary agricultural work. This image of the farmer-king recalls Cincinnatus of Rome and anticipates David the shepherd-king. Saul's question 'What aileth the people?' shows he was not present when the messengers arrived, underscoring the providential timing of his return at this precise moment.
And the Spirit of God came upon Saul when he heard those tidings, and his anger was kindled greatly.
View commentary
The Spirit of God (ruach Elohim) coming upon Saul echoes the empowerment of the judges (Judges 3:10; 6:34; 11:29). The phrase 'came upon' (tsalach) implies rushing or falling upon with overwhelming force. Notably, his anger 'was kindled greatly' - righteous indignation that mirrors God's own jealousy for His people's honor. This Spirit-empowered anger transforms the hesitant Saul of chapter 10 into a decisive military leader. The conjunction of divine Spirit and holy anger demonstrates that godly leadership requires both supernatural enablement and passionate commitment to justice.
And he took a yoke of oxen, and hewed them in pieces, and sent them throughout all the coasts of Israel by the hands of messengers, saying, Whosoever cometh not forth after Saul and after Samuel, so shall it be done unto his oxen. And the fear of the LORD fell on the people, and they came out with one consent. with: Heb. as one man
View commentary
Saul's dramatic action of cutting the oxen in pieces and sending them throughout Israel served as a vivid summons to war and a solemn warning of consequences for non-compliance. The phrase 'the fear of the LORD fell on the people' indicates this was no mere human manipulation but divine intervention compelling response. The 'one consent' (echad - one, unity) marks a rare moment of tribal solidarity that prefigures what unified kingdom could accomplish. Saul associates Samuel with the summons, acknowledging prophetic authority alongside royal power.
And when he numbered them in Bezek, the children of Israel were three hundred thousand, and the men of Judah thirty thousand.
View commentary
The mustering at Bezek, strategically positioned for the Jordan crossing to reach Jabesh-gilead, demonstrates effective military organization. The separate numbering of Israel (300,000) and Judah (30,000) foreshadows the eventual division of the kingdom. This distinction, maintained throughout the narrative, suggests tribal tensions that Solomon's son Rehoboam would fatally exacerbate. The large numbers, while possibly representative or using different counting methods, emphasize the complete reversal from despair to overwhelming force.
And they said unto the messengers that came, Thus shall ye say unto the men of Jabeshgilead , To morrow, by that time the sun be hot, ye shall have help. And the messengers came and shewed it to the men of Jabesh; and they were glad. help: or, deliverance
View commentary
The confident message promising deliverance 'by that time the sun be hot' demonstrates faith transformed into action. What began as impossible - a relief force materializing within seven days - becomes certainty through Spirit-empowered leadership. The timing 'by the heat of the day' indicates a morning attack, utilizing the element of surprise and the sun's position for tactical advantage. The men of Jabesh 'were glad,' their hope vindicated and their faith rewarded.
Therefore the men of Jabesh said, To morrow we will come out unto you, and ye shall do with us all that seemeth good unto you.
View commentary
The men of Jabesh employ strategic deception, telling the Ammonites they will 'come out' to them - language implying surrender while actually preparing for coordinated military action with Saul's forces. This is not sinful lying but legitimate military strategy against an enemy intent on cruelty and blasphemy. Their phrase 'ye shall do with us all that seemeth good unto you' echoes the language of covenant submission while concealing their true intent. God uses their wisdom alongside Saul's valor.
And it was so on the morrow, that Saul put the people in three companies; and they came into the midst of the host in the morning watch, and slew the Ammonites until the heat of the day: and it came to pass, that they which remained were scattered, so that two of them were not left together.
View commentary
Saul's tactical brilliance appears in his three-company formation attacking during the 'morning watch' (2-6 AM), achieving complete surprise. The phrase 'slew the Ammonites until the heat of the day' fulfills the promise of verse 9 precisely. That no 'two of them were left together' indicates total victory - the enemy scattered so completely they could not even flee in pairs. This crushing defeat vindicated Israel's God and established Saul's military credentials. Divine empowerment combined with human skill produced overwhelming triumph.
Saul Confirmed as King
And the people said unto Samuel, Who is he that said, Shall Saul reign over us? bring the men, that we may put them to death.
View commentary
The people's demand to execute those who had questioned Saul's kingship (10:27) reveals the dangerous mixture of zealotry and mob mentality that military victory can produce. They seek to vindicate the new king through blood vengeance rather than mercy. The Hebrew muth ('put to death') indicates they desired formal execution, not lynch mob violence. This moment tests whether Saul will rule by grace or revenge, by wisdom or populist passion.
And Saul said, There shall not a man be put to death this day: for to day the LORD hath wrought salvation in Israel.
View commentary
Saul's refusal to execute his critics represents his finest moment, demonstrating kingly restraint and theological insight. His reasoning - 'to day the LORD hath wrought salvation in Israel' - correctly attributes victory to God rather than himself. The phrase 'there shall not a man be put to death this day' establishes a precedent of royal mercy that reflects divine grace. Saul recognizes that celebration of God's deliverance should not be marred by internal bloodshed. This grace toward enemies would, ironically, later contribute to his downfall when he spared Agag.
Then said Samuel to the people, Come, and let us go to Gilgal, and renew the kingdom there.
View commentary
Samuel's call to 'renew the kingdom' at Gilgal indicates a recommitment ceremony, not a second coronation. Gilgal held profound significance as the site where Israel first camped after crossing the Jordan (Joshua 4:19) and where circumcision renewed the covenant (Joshua 5:2-9). By choosing Gilgal, Samuel connects Saul's confirmed kingship to Israel's foundational covenant relationship with Yahweh. The renewal implies that Saul's proven leadership through the Ammonite crisis has legitimized what some had questioned.
And all the people went to Gilgal; and there they made Saul king before the LORD in Gilgal; and there they sacrificed sacrifices of peace offerings before the LORD; and there Saul and all the men of Israel rejoiced greatly.
View commentary
The chapter concludes with national celebration: sacrifices 'before the LORD,' the formal establishment of Saul as king, and rejoicing that unites the entire assembly. The peace offerings (shelamim) emphasized fellowship and celebration, with portions shared among worshippers. That 'all the men of Israel rejoiced greatly' marks the high point of Saul's reign - a united people, a proven king, enemies defeated, and God glorified. This moment of joy makes Saul's subsequent decline all the more tragic.