About Deuteronomy

Deuteronomy contains Moses' final addresses to Israel, restating the Law and calling the new generation to covenant faithfulness.

Author: MosesWritten: c. 1406 BCReading time: ~3 minVerses: 23
Covenant RenewalObedienceLove for GodBlessing and CurseRememberChoose

Places in This Chapter

View map →

King James Version

Deuteronomy 15

23 verses with commentary

The Year of Release

At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release.

View commentary
At the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release. The sabbatical year principle extended rest and release beyond the weekly Sabbath to a seven-year cycle. This mandated periodic economic reset protected the poor and prevented permanent poverty classes from developing.

The release (shemitah) involved forgiving debts, freeing Hebrew servants, and letting land lie fallow. These interconnected provisions created comprehensive social and economic renewal every seventh year. God's concern for justice and mercy permeates His economic legislation.

The seven-year cycle mirrored the seven-day weekly cycle, establishing that both individuals and society need periodic rest and renewal. Just as persons need Sabbath rest, economic systems need sabbatical reset to prevent exploitation and injustice from calcifying into permanent structures.

Reformed theology sees here divine concern for comprehensive flourishing - spiritual, physical, economic, and social. God's law promotes holistic shalom where relationships are regularly restored and economic disparities periodically corrected.

And this is the manner of the release: Every creditor that lendeth ought unto his neighbour shall release it; he shall not exact it of his neighbour, or of his brother; because it is called the LORD'S release. creditor: Heb. master of the lending of his hand

View commentary
And this is the manner of the release: Every creditor that lendeth ought unto his neighbour shall release it; he shall not exact it of his neighbour, or of his brother; because it is called the LORD'S release. Creditors must release debts owed by fellow Israelites every seventh year. This radical provision prevented debt from becoming perpetual slavery and maintained economic mobility.

The phrase shall not exact it makes debt forgiveness mandatory, not optional. This was not encouraged charity but commanded justice. God's economic law required periodic cancellation of debts among covenant brothers, preventing creditor classes from exploiting the poor indefinitely.

The designation the LORD'S release reveals that debt forgiveness flows from God's character and authority. Just as God forgives His people's spiritual debts, they must forgive one another's financial debts. The principle anticipates the Lord's Prayer - forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors.

This creates economic system fundamentally different from surrounding cultures where debt slavery was permanent and exploitative. Israel's economy operated on grace and periodic renewal, reflecting God's redemptive character.

Of a foreigner thou mayest exact it again: but that which is thine with thy brother thine hand shall release;

View commentary
Of a foreigner thou mayest exact it again: but that which is thine with thy brother thine hand shall release. The distinction between foreigners and brothers reveals the covenant basis of sabbatical release. Special obligations exist within the covenant community that do not extend to outside commercial relationships.

Debts owed by foreigners (non-Israelites) could still be collected, as they were not part of the covenant community subject to Israel's internal social legislation. This maintained normal commercial relationships with surrounding nations while creating special economic mercy among God's people.

The phrase that which is thine with thy brother emphasizes covenant family relationship. Fellow Israelites were not merely business associates but brothers in covenant, sharing special bonds requiring mutual care and periodic economic restoration.

This parallels New Testament teaching about special obligations to the household of faith (Galatians 6:10). While Christians should do good to all, they bear particular responsibility for fellow believers' welfare.

Save when there shall be no poor among you; for the LORD shall greatly bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it: Save: or, To the end that there be no poor among you

View commentary
Save when there shall be no poor among you; for the LORD shall greatly bless thee in the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee to inherit it. This verse presents God's ideal - faithful covenant obedience should result in elimination of poverty. If Israel kept God's commands, His blessing would ensure no permanent poor class existed.

The phrase there shall be no poor among you is both promise and goal. Obedience to sabbatical laws, gleaning regulations, and other social legislation would prevent systemic poverty from developing. Periodic debt release and land redistribution (Jubilee) maintained economic mobility.

However, verse 11 later acknowledges reality - the poor would always exist due to human sin and disobedience. The tension between ideal (no poor) and reality (poor always present) demonstrates that while God's law provides framework for flourishing, human failure to observe it perpetuates poverty.

Reformed theology recognizes that comprehensive societal blessing requires comprehensive societal obedience. When nations follow God's righteous principles, flourishing results; when they reject His ways, poverty and injustice multiply.

Only if thou carefully hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to observe to do all these commandments which I command thee this day.

View commentary
Only if thou carefully hearken unto the voice of the LORD thy God, to observe to do all these commandments which I command thee this day. The promise of comprehensive blessing is conditional - only if Israel carefully obeys God's commands. Prosperity flows from faithfulness; poverty results from disobedience.

The emphasis carefully hearken demands attentive listening with intent to obey. Mere hearing is insufficient; active obedience to God's voice is required. This connects hearing and doing, faith and works - genuine faith manifests in obedient action.

The phrase all these commandments prohibits selective obedience. Israel could not choose to observe Sabbath while ignoring sabbatical release, or honor ceremonial laws while neglecting social justice. God demands comprehensive obedience to the entire covenant package.

This principle pervades Scripture - blessing follows obedience (Deuteronomy 28). While salvation comes by grace through faith, not by works, sanctification and temporal blessing have organic connection to obedience. God's moral order links righteousness and flourishing.

For the LORD thy God blesseth thee, as he promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee.

View commentary
For the LORD thy God blesseth thee, as he promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over many nations, but they shall not reign over thee. The promise that YHWH elohekha yebarekhekha (the LORD your God will bless you) grounds Israel's economic prosperity in covenant obedience. The Hebrew avat (lend) pictures creditor status, while avoiding lavah (borrow/be indebted) preserves independence and dignity.

This economic dominance—lending to nations, ruling over them—reverses the curse of Deuteronomy 28:43-44 where disobedience brings debt and subjugation. The blessing isn't merely wealth but sovereignty and freedom from foreign domination. Proverbs 22:7 notes that 'the borrower is servant to the lender,' so Israel's creditor position represents freedom and authority. Yet this prosperity is conditional on covenant faithfulness (15:4-5)—obedience brings blessing, disobedience brings cursing. The promise anticipates Solomon's wealth and international influence (1 Kings 10:14-29) but was repeatedly forfeited through apostasy.

If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren within any of thy gates in thy land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thine heart, nor shut thine hand from thy poor brother:

View commentary
The command: 'If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren within any of thy gates in thy land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thine heart, nor shut thine hand from thy poor brother.' The specific situation: poverty exists despite covenant blessing. The prohibition: don't 'harden heart' (amats levav, אָמַץ לֵבָב, strengthen/harden heart against) or 'shut hand' (qaphats yad, קָפַץ יָד, close fist). Hard hearts produce closed hands. The designation 'thy poor brother' emphasizes covenant relationship—these aren't strangers but family. Generosity isn't optional charity but covenant duty. The phrase 'within any of thy gates' makes it local and personal—neighbors in need, not abstract poverty.

But thou shalt open thine hand wide unto him, and shalt surely lend him sufficient for his need, in that which he wanteth.

View commentary
But thou shalt open thine hand wide unto him, and shalt surely lend him sufficient for his need, in that which he wanteth. The emphatic Hebrew construction patoakh tiftakh (opening, you shall open) and ha'avet ta'avitenu (lending, you shall lend) intensifies the command—generosity toward the poor is not optional but obligatory. Dei makhsoro (sufficient for his need) indicates meeting actual necessity, not mere token assistance. The phrase asher yekhsar lo (what he lacks) personalizes aid—each person's need differs, requiring discernment, not formulaic charity.

This open-handed generosity contrasts with the closed-fisted stinginess warned against in 15:7, 9. The Sabbatical year debt release (15:1-3) might tempt creditors to refuse loans as the release year approached. God commands lending anyway, trusting Him to provide. Jesus echoes this principle: 'Give to him that asketh thee' (Matthew 5:42); 'from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.' The early church practiced radical generosity (Acts 2:44-45; 4:32-35), fulfilling the ideal that 'there be no poor among you' (Deuteronomy 15:4).

Beware that there be not a thought in thy wicked heart, saying, The seventh year, the year of release, is at hand; and thine eye be evil against thy poor brother, and thou givest him nought; and he cry unto the LORD against thee, and it be sin unto thee. thought: Heb. word wicked: Heb. Belial

View commentary
Beware that there be not a thought in thy wicked heart, saying, The seventh year, the year of release, is at hand; and thine eye be evil against thy poor brother, and thou givest him nought; and he cry unto the LORD against thee, and it be sin unto thee. The warning hishamer lekha (beware/take heed) addresses internal motivation, not merely external action. A davar-beliya'al (base/worthless thought) entertained in the levav (heart) constitutes sin even before manifesting in refusal to lend.

The ayin ra'ah (evil eye) is a Hebrew idiom for stinginess and ill will (cf. Proverbs 23:6; 28:22; Matthew 6:23). Calculating when to withhold charity based on the approaching Sabbatical year reveals heart-level greed and covenant-breaking. The phrase qara aleikha el-YHWH (he cry unto the LORD against you) echoes Exodus 22:23-24—God hears the oppressed and judges their oppressors. What begins as internal calculation becomes external sin when acted upon, incurring guilt (hayah bekha khet—'it will be sin unto you').

Thou shalt surely give him, and thine heart shall not be grieved when thou givest unto him: because that for this thing the LORD thy God shall bless thee in all thy works, and in all that thou puttest thine hand unto.

View commentary
Thou shalt surely give him, and thine heart shall not be grieved when thou givest unto him: because that for this thing the LORD thy God shall bless thee in all thy works, and in all that thou puttest thine hand unto. The emphatic naton titten lo (giving, you shall give) requires actual generosity, while lo-yera levavkha (your heart shall not be grieved/grudging) demands cheerful giving. Paul quotes this principle: 'God loveth a cheerful giver' (2 Corinthians 9:7). External compliance with internal resentment perverts obedience into legalism.

The promise ki biglal hadavar hazeh yebarekh-kha YHWH (because of this thing the LORD will bless you) establishes reciprocal generosity—giving releases God's blessing. Bekhol-ma'asekha (in all your works) and bekhol-mishlakh yadekha (in all that your hand undertakes) promise comprehensive prosperity for those who give freely. Proverbs 11:24-25 observes this paradox: 'There is that scattereth, and yet increaseth.' Jesus promised: 'Give, and it shall be given unto you' (Luke 6:38). Generosity creates overflow, stinginess creates lack.

For the poor shall never cease out of the land: therefore I command thee, saying, Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land.

View commentary
Moses states: 'For the poor shall never cease out of the land: therefore I command thee, saying, Thou shalt open thine hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land.' The realistic acknowledgment that poverty won't be eradicated doesn't excuse indifference but intensifies obligation—ongoing need requires ongoing generosity. The command to 'open thine hand wide' suggests generous, unstinting giving, not grudging minimum. Jesus quotes this verse (Matthew 26:11), often misunderstood as justifying neglect of the poor. The point is the opposite—perpetual poverty demands perpetual charity.

Release of Servants

And if thy brother, an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee six years; then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee.

View commentary
If thy brother, an Hebrew man, or an Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve thee six years; then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free—The eved Ivri (עֶבֶד עִבְרִי, 'Hebrew servant') entered servitude through debt (Exodus 21:2-6), not ethnicity. The seventh year echoes creation's Sabbath rest—as God ceased labor, so must economic bondage cease. Liberation isn't earned but calendrically mandated.

This foreshadows Christ's acceptable year of the LORD (Luke 4:19, citing Isaiah 61:1-2)—the ultimate Jubilee. Paul applies it: Ye are bought with a price; be not ye the servants of men (1 Corinthians 7:23). Our debt-slavery to sin found its seventh-year in the cross, where Christ declared: It is finished (John 19:30). The Hebrew servant law taught Israel that God liberates—a principle fulfilled cosmically in redemption.

And when thou sendest him out free from thee, thou shalt not let him go away empty:

View commentary
And when thou sendest him out free from thee, thou shalt not let him go away empty—Liberation without provision is cruelty. God commands furnish him liberally (הַעֲנֵיק תַּעֲנִיק, ha'aneiq ta'aniq, intensive: 'you shall certainly endow') from thy flock, and out of thy floor, and out of thy winepress—comprehensive provision enabling fresh start, not mere dismissal into destitution.

This mirrors God's redemption: not only freed from Egypt but enriched—They borrowed of the Egyptians jewels of silver, and jewels of gold (Exodus 12:35). Christ likewise: Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings (Ephesians 1:3). Salvation includes liberation and inheritance. The servant law taught that God's grace is extravagant, not minimal.

Thou shalt furnish him liberally out of thy flock, and out of thy floor, and out of thy winepress: of that wherewith the LORD thy God hath blessed thee thou shalt give unto him.

View commentary
Of that wherewith the LORD thy God hath blessed thee thou shalt give unto him—The motivation for generosity: you're redistributing God's blessing, not surrendering your achievement. This destroys pride: What hast thou that thou didst not receive? (1 Corinthians 4:7). The master's wealth came from God's blessing, making stinginess toward the freed servant ingratitude toward God.

The Greek word koinonia (κοινωνία, 'fellowship, sharing') describes the early church: All that believed were together, and had all things common (Acts 2:44). This wasn't communism but recognition that the earth is the LORD's (Psalm 24:1). We're stewards, not owners. The servant law embodied 'kingdom economics': abundant grace produces generous giving, creating flourishing community.

And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in the land of Egypt, and the LORD thy God redeemed thee: therefore I command thee this thing to day.

View commentary
And thou shalt remember that thou wast a bondman in the land of Egypt, and the LORD thy God redeemed thee—The ultimate motivation: memory of your own redemption. Israel's generosity must mirror God's grace. The verb redeemed (פָּדָה, padah) means 'to ransom, deliver by payment'—God paid the price for Israel's freedom.

Peter applies this: Ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold...but with the precious blood of Christ (1 Peter 1:18-19). Freely ye have received, freely give (Matthew 10:8). The cross makes miserliness absurd—hoarding when you've received infinite grace. Paul's rhetorical question devastates self-righteousness: Who maketh thee to differ from another? (1 Corinthians 4:7). Every blessing traces to unmerited grace; therefore all generosity is merely 'paying forward' what we could never repay upward.

And it shall be, if he say unto thee, I will not go away from thee; because he loveth thee and thine house, because he is well with thee;

View commentary
And it shall be, if he say unto thee, I will not go away from thee; because he loveth thee and thine house, because he is well with thee—The servant may choose permanent servitude out of love (אָהַב, ahav, covenant loyalty). This voluntary submission transforms the relationship: no longer debt-bondage but devoted service. He is well with thee (טוֹב לוֹ עִמָּךְ, tov lo immakh)—prosperity found in relationship, not independence.

This pictures the believer's relationship to Christ: I am my beloved's, and my beloved is mine (Song 6:3). We're freed to leave but choose to stay: Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life (John 6:68). Voluntary submission to Christ isn't slavery but supreme freedom: His service is perfect freedom (Book of Common Prayer). The ear-piercing ceremony (next verse) symbolizes permanent identity in the master's household.

Then thou shalt take an aul, and thrust it through his ear unto the door, and he shall be thy servant for ever. And also unto thy maidservant thou shalt do likewise.

View commentary
Then thou shalt take an aul, and thrust it through his ear unto the door, and he shall be thy servant for ever—The ear-piercing ceremony created permanent, visible identity. The door (דֶּלֶת, deleth) represented the household; the pierced ear signified: 'I belong here.' The once-freed servant now bears voluntary marks of devotion.

Paul echoes this: I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus (Galatians 6:17). Baptism serves similarly—public identification with Christ's death and resurrection (Romans 6:3-4). The pierced ear taught Israel that covenant relationship involves visible, permanent commitment. We're not secret disciples but branded sheep: The Lord knoweth them that are his (2 Timothy 2:19). Christ Himself bears permanent marks—Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails (John 20:25)—scars of His voluntary submission to the Father's will.

It shall not seem hard unto thee, when thou sendest him away free from thee; for he hath been worth a double hired servant to thee, in serving thee six years: and the LORD thy God shall bless thee in all that thou doest.

View commentary
It shall not seem hard unto thee, when thou sendest him away free from thee; for he hath been worth a double hired servant to thee, in serving thee six years—God addresses the master's potential resentment. The servant provided double (מִשְׁנֶה, mishneh) value—slaves worked comprehensively (24/7), while hired hands worked set hours. Releasing him is economically fair, not sacrificial loss.

Yet the deeper principle: obedience shouldn't seem hard when we calculate God's prior generosity. I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice (Romans 12:1)—in view of mercy, sacrifice seems reasonable. The freed servant's 'double service' reminds us: He saved us...not by works of righteousness which we have done (Titus 3:5). We've contributed nothing; therefore releasing others' debts is trivial compared to our canceled debt.

Consecration of Firstborn Animals

All the firstling males that come of thy herd and of thy flock thou shalt sanctify unto the LORD thy God: thou shalt do no work with the firstling of thy bullock, nor shear the firstling of thy sheep.

View commentary
All the firstling males that come of thy herd and of thy flock thou shalt sanctify unto the LORD thy God—The bekhor (בְּכוֹר, 'firstborn') belongs to God, echoing Passover: God spared Israel's firstborn while judging Egypt's (Exodus 11-12). Sanctifying (קָדַשׁ, qadash, 'to set apart as holy') the firstborn acknowledges all life originates from and belongs to God.

Thou shalt do no work with the firstling of thy bullock, nor shear the firstling of thy sheep—No economic exploitation of consecrated animals. They're withdrawn from utilitarian use, pointing to Christ, the firstborn among many brethren (Romans 8:29), who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God (Hebrews 9:14). The firstborn law trained Israel: God's holy things aren't tools but objects of worship.

Thou shalt eat it before the LORD thy God year by year in the place which the LORD shall choose, thou and thy household.

View commentary
Thou shalt eat it before the LORD thy God year by year in the place which the LORD shall choose, thou and thy household—The firstborn animal becomes a covenant meal, eaten at the central sanctuary. Worship combines sacrifice (the animal dies) and celebration (the family feasts). This dual nature foreshadows the Lord's Supper: This is my body, which is given for you (Luke 22:19)—Christ's death enables our fellowship feast.

Year by year emphasizes regularity—covenant worship is rhythmic, not sporadic. The annual pilgrimage to the place which the LORD shall choose (Jerusalem, Deuteronomy 12:5) unified Israel, preventing tribal fragmentation. Modern application: corporate worship isn't optional but essential. Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together (Hebrews 10:25)—gathered worship sustains covenant identity.

And if there be any blemish therein, as if it be lame, or blind, or have any ill blemish, thou shalt not sacrifice it unto the LORD thy God.

View commentary
And if there be any blemish therein, as if it be lame, or blind, or have any ill blemish, thou shalt not sacrifice it unto the LORD thy God—Blemished animals (מוּם, mum, 'defect, flaw') are unacceptable offerings. God deserves the best, not leftovers. Malachi confronts Israel: Ye offer polluted bread...and ye say, Wherein have we polluted thee?...Ye offered the blind for sacrifice...offer it now unto thy governor; will he be pleased with thee? (Malachi 1:7-8).

The blemish requirement foreshadows Christ: a lamb without blemish and without spot (1 Peter 1:19). His sinless perfection qualified Him as the ultimate sacrifice. The standard calls worshipers to excellence: Whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God (1 Corinthians 10:31). Offering God our second-best (leftover time, minimal effort, token generosity) insults His worth. He gave His flawless Son; we owe wholehearted devotion.

Thou shalt eat it within thy gates: the unclean and the clean person shall eat it alike, as the roebuck, and as the hart.

View commentary
Thou shalt eat it within thy gates: the unclean and the clean person shall eat it alike, as the roebuck, and as the hart—Blemished firstborn animals, unsuitable for sacrifice, may be eaten domestically as ordinary food. The unclean and the clean (ritually, not morally) may both eat—it's no longer consecrated food but common provision. Like roebuck (צְבִי, tsevi, gazelle) and hart (אַיָּל, ayyal, deer)—wild game, never sacrificial—it's simply meat.

This principle preserves God's holiness: what's unfit for His altar becomes common use, preventing false worship. We mustn't present to God what fails His standards while claiming devotion. Yet He graciously provides—the blemished animal still nourishes the family. God rejects sub-standard worship but continues material provision, demonstrating patience: The LORD is merciful and gracious, slow to anger (Psalm 103:8).

Only thou shalt not eat the blood thereof; thou shalt pour it upon the ground as water.

View commentary
Only thou shalt not eat the blood thereof; thou shalt pour it upon the ground as water—Even in common meals, blood remains sacred: The life of the flesh is in the blood (Leviticus 17:11). The prohibition to pour it upon the ground returns life symbolically to God—acknowledging Him as life's source and owner. This ordinance applied to all meat consumption, not only sacrifice, making every meal a theological act.

Hebrews explains the ultimate significance: Without shedding of blood is no remission (Hebrews 9:22). Christ's blood, shed and poured out for many for the remission of sins (Matthew 26:28), accomplished what animal blood foreshadowed. The Lord's Supper reverses the command—we drink Christ's blood (symbolically, John 6:53-56), internalizing the New Covenant's atoning power. Blood poured out in the Old Covenant becomes blood taken in under the New.

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study