King James Version
Daniel 10
21 verses with commentary
Daniel's Vision of a Man
In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia a thing was revealed unto Daniel, whose name was called Belteshazzar; and the thing was true, but the time appointed was long: and he understood the thing, and had understanding of the vision. long: Heb. great
View commentary
Chapter 10 introduces Daniel's final and longest vision: "In the third year of Cyrus king of Persia a thing was revealed unto Daniel, whose name was called Belteshazzar." Dating to 536 BC, this occurs after the first return of Jewish exiles under Zerubbabel (Ezra 1-2). Daniel, now about 85 years old, remained in Persia rather than returning to Jerusalem, continuing governmental service while maintaining prophetic ministry. The mention of both names—Hebrew (Daniel, "God is my judge") and Babylonian (Belteshazzar)—emphasizes his dual identity: covenant faithful yet politically engaged.
"The thing was true, but the time appointed was long" warns that the vision concerns distant future events. "True" (Hebrew: emet, אֱמֶת) emphasizes absolute reliability; "time appointed was long" (Hebrew: tsaba gadol, צָבָא גָדוֹל, literally "great warfare/conflict") indicates prolonged struggle. This vision spans from Persian period through Greek, culminating in Antiochus Epiphanes and beyond. The scope overwhelms—Daniel sees centuries of conflict affecting God's people.
"He understood the thing, and had understanding of the vision" indicates Daniel grasped its meaning through divine illumination. Unlike chapter 8 where understanding came gradually, here Daniel receives comprehensive comprehension. This teaches that God gives understanding proportional to need—sometimes immediately, sometimes progressively. The Holy Spirit's illumination ministry enables believers to understand Scripture according to God's timing and their spiritual maturity. Full understanding awaits glorification, but God provides sufficient light for present faithfulness.
"The thing was true, but the time appointed was long" warns that the vision concerns distant future events. "True" (Hebrew: emet, אֱמֶת) emphasizes absolute reliability; "time appointed was long" (Hebrew: tsaba gadol, צָבָא גָדוֹל, literally "great warfare/conflict") indicates prolonged struggle. This vision spans from Persian period through Greek, culminating in Antiochus Epiphanes and beyond. The scope overwhelms—Daniel sees centuries of conflict affecting God's people.
"He understood the thing, and had understanding of the vision" indicates Daniel grasped its meaning through divine illumination. Unlike chapter 8 where understanding came gradually, here Daniel receives comprehensive comprehension. This teaches that God gives understanding proportional to need—sometimes immediately, sometimes progressively. The Holy Spirit's illumination ministry enables believers to understand Scripture according to God's timing and their spiritual maturity. Full understanding awaits glorification, but God provides sufficient light for present faithfulness.
In those days I Daniel was mourning three full weeks. full: Heb. weeks of days
View commentary
Daniel's preparation for the vision involved intense spiritual discipline: "In those days I Daniel was mourning three full weeks." The Hebrew avel (אָבֵל, "mourning") indicates deep grief, not mere sadness. This three-week period of mourning preceded the vision, suggesting intentional spiritual preparation. Daniel's grief likely concerned Jerusalem's situation—though exiles returned, opposition hindered temple rebuilding (Ezra 4). Faithful intercession often precedes divine revelation; spiritual receptivity requires self-denial and focused prayer.
The three-week period is significant—verse 13 reveals angelic warfare occurring during this time. Daniel's prayers triggered spiritual battle in heavenly realms. His perseverance in prayer despite delayed answer demonstrates faith that continues seeking God when immediate response doesn't come. Many quit praying after days or weeks; Daniel prayed through despite three weeks of apparent silence. Persistent prayer isn't manipulating God but aligning ourselves with His purposes, demonstrating faith that trusts even when answers delay.
This models Christ's intercession, who "always lives to intercede" (Hebrews 7:25). Jesus spent nights in prayer, agonized in Gethsemane, and maintains eternal intercession for His people. Daniel's mourning and prayer points to Christ's superior ministry—His perfect intercession accomplishes what our flawed prayers cannot. Yet Christ invites believers to join His intercessory work, partnering with Him in prayer that moves heaven and changes earth.
The three-week period is significant—verse 13 reveals angelic warfare occurring during this time. Daniel's prayers triggered spiritual battle in heavenly realms. His perseverance in prayer despite delayed answer demonstrates faith that continues seeking God when immediate response doesn't come. Many quit praying after days or weeks; Daniel prayed through despite three weeks of apparent silence. Persistent prayer isn't manipulating God but aligning ourselves with His purposes, demonstrating faith that trusts even when answers delay.
This models Christ's intercession, who "always lives to intercede" (Hebrews 7:25). Jesus spent nights in prayer, agonized in Gethsemane, and maintains eternal intercession for His people. Daniel's mourning and prayer points to Christ's superior ministry—His perfect intercession accomplishes what our flawed prayers cannot. Yet Christ invites believers to join His intercessory work, partnering with Him in prayer that moves heaven and changes earth.
I ate no pleasant bread, neither came flesh nor wine in my mouth, neither did I anoint myself at all, till three whole weeks were fulfilled. pleasant: Heb. bread of desires
View commentary
Daniel describes his fast: "I ate no pleasant bread, neither came flesh nor wine in my mouth, neither did I anoint myself at all, till three whole weeks were fulfilled." This wasn't total fasting (no food) but partial fasting—abstaining from enjoyable foods and normal comforts. "Pleasant bread" refers to delicacies; avoiding "flesh" and "wine" eliminated protein-rich and celebratory foods; not anointing himself forsook basic cosmetic care (normal in ancient Near East). This voluntary self-denial demonstrated serious spiritual purpose.
The specificity teaches that fasting varies in intensity and form. Daniel didn't cease eating entirely (which would be unsustainable for three weeks) but eliminated pleasures, maintaining only basic sustenance. This practical approach models sustainable spiritual discipline—not extreme asceticism that destroys health, but purposeful self-denial that focuses attention on spiritual matters. Fasting from legitimate pleasures (not sins) creates space for enhanced prayer and spiritual sensitivity.
Biblically, fasting accompanies serious prayer, repentance, or seeking divine guidance. Jesus fasted forty days before ministry (Matthew 4:2), early church fasted when commissioning missionaries (Acts 13:2-3), and Paul fasted during crises (2 Corinthians 11:27). Yet Jesus warned against ostentatious fasting seeking human praise (Matthew 6:16-18). Daniel's private fast, combined with effectual prayer, demonstrates proper balance—genuine spiritual discipline without religious showmanship.
The specificity teaches that fasting varies in intensity and form. Daniel didn't cease eating entirely (which would be unsustainable for three weeks) but eliminated pleasures, maintaining only basic sustenance. This practical approach models sustainable spiritual discipline—not extreme asceticism that destroys health, but purposeful self-denial that focuses attention on spiritual matters. Fasting from legitimate pleasures (not sins) creates space for enhanced prayer and spiritual sensitivity.
Biblically, fasting accompanies serious prayer, repentance, or seeking divine guidance. Jesus fasted forty days before ministry (Matthew 4:2), early church fasted when commissioning missionaries (Acts 13:2-3), and Paul fasted during crises (2 Corinthians 11:27). Yet Jesus warned against ostentatious fasting seeking human praise (Matthew 6:16-18). Daniel's private fast, combined with effectual prayer, demonstrates proper balance—genuine spiritual discipline without religious showmanship.
And in the four and twentieth day of the first month, as I was by the side of the great river, which is Hiddekel;
View commentary
Daniel locates the vision: "And in the four and twentieth day of the first month, as I was by the side of the great river, which is Hiddekel." This precise dating (24th of Nisan/Abib, approximately mid-April) occurs during Passover season. Daniel spent three weeks mourning (verses 2-3) overlapping this holy season, forsaking celebration to intercede for Jerusalem. The location "Hiddekel" identifies the Tigris River, one of Eden's rivers (Genesis 2:14), connecting this vision to creation's beginning and anticipating new creation's culmination.
The Tigris setting is significant—Daniel stands at geographical heart of Mesopotamian civilization, site of ancient Babel (Genesis 11) where human pride challenged God. Now revelation comes to Daniel at this same location, showing God's sovereign purpose to establish His kingdom despite human rebellion. The vision at this river, in Passover season, connects creation (Eden), rebellion (Babel), redemption (Passover/Exodus), and consummation (this vision's eschatological content). All redemptive history converges in this moment.
Theologically, the specific time and place ground the vision in history, not mere symbolic abstraction. God reveals Himself in space-time reality, not gnostic timeless spirituality. This prefigures the incarnation—the Word became flesh at a specific time (Galatians 4:4) and place (Bethlehem). God's decisive acts occur in history, creating concrete moments that become fixed reference points for faith. The resurrection occurred on a specific Sunday morning, not in mystical timelessness. Christianity is historical religion rooted in actual events.
The Tigris setting is significant—Daniel stands at geographical heart of Mesopotamian civilization, site of ancient Babel (Genesis 11) where human pride challenged God. Now revelation comes to Daniel at this same location, showing God's sovereign purpose to establish His kingdom despite human rebellion. The vision at this river, in Passover season, connects creation (Eden), rebellion (Babel), redemption (Passover/Exodus), and consummation (this vision's eschatological content). All redemptive history converges in this moment.
Theologically, the specific time and place ground the vision in history, not mere symbolic abstraction. God reveals Himself in space-time reality, not gnostic timeless spirituality. This prefigures the incarnation—the Word became flesh at a specific time (Galatians 4:4) and place (Bethlehem). God's decisive acts occur in history, creating concrete moments that become fixed reference points for faith. The resurrection occurred on a specific Sunday morning, not in mystical timelessness. Christianity is historical religion rooted in actual events.
Then I lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a certain man clothed in linen, whose loins were girded with fine gold of Uphaz: a: Heb. one man
View commentary
Daniel describes the vision's central figure: "Then I lifted up mine eyes, and looked, and behold a certain man clothed in linen, whose loins were girded with fine gold of Uphaz." This glorious being strongly resembles the glorified Christ in Revelation 1:12-16. "Clothed in linen" suggests priestly garments (Exodus 28:42, Leviticus 6:10)—linen symbolizes purity and holiness. "Loins...girded" indicates readiness for action and strength (Ephesians 6:14). "Fine gold of Uphaz" (possibly Ophir, source of finest gold) emphasizes splendor and value.
The identity of this figure is debated. Some scholars see an exalted angel (possibly Gabriel or Michael); others identify this as a Christophany—pre-incarnate appearance of Christ. The strong parallels with Revelation 1 support the Christophany interpretation. Similarities include: appearing in glorious light, having bronze-like appearance (verse 6), causing observers to fall in terror, requiring strengthening touch. Whether angel or Christ, this figure represents divine authority and holiness that overwhelms human capacity to endure.
The appearance of such glory to Daniel demonstrates that God prepares His servants for difficult revelations through encounters with His holiness. Before revealing extended prophecy of conflict and persecution (chapters 11-12), God manifests His glorious power, strengthening Daniel and assuring him of divine sovereignty over all coming events. This pattern appears throughout Scripture—Isaiah's temple vision precedes his prophetic commission (Isaiah 6), Paul's Damascus road encounter precedes his apostolic ministry (Acts 9). Encountering God's glory prepares servants for demanding callings.
The identity of this figure is debated. Some scholars see an exalted angel (possibly Gabriel or Michael); others identify this as a Christophany—pre-incarnate appearance of Christ. The strong parallels with Revelation 1 support the Christophany interpretation. Similarities include: appearing in glorious light, having bronze-like appearance (verse 6), causing observers to fall in terror, requiring strengthening touch. Whether angel or Christ, this figure represents divine authority and holiness that overwhelms human capacity to endure.
The appearance of such glory to Daniel demonstrates that God prepares His servants for difficult revelations through encounters with His holiness. Before revealing extended prophecy of conflict and persecution (chapters 11-12), God manifests His glorious power, strengthening Daniel and assuring him of divine sovereignty over all coming events. This pattern appears throughout Scripture—Isaiah's temple vision precedes his prophetic commission (Isaiah 6), Paul's Damascus road encounter precedes his apostolic ministry (Acts 9). Encountering God's glory prepares servants for demanding callings.
His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in colour to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude.
View commentary
Daniel describes the glorious figure he sees: 'His body also was like the beryl, and his face as the appearance of lightning, and his eyes as lamps of fire, and his arms and his feet like in colour to polished brass, and the voice of his words like the voice of a multitude.' This description closely parallels Revelation 1:13-16's vision of Christ, suggesting this may be a Christophany (pre-incarnate Christ appearance) or a high-ranking angel. The details emphasize glory, power, and majesty: beryl (precious stone), lightning (brilliant, overwhelming), fire (holy, penetrating), brass (strong, refined), multitude's voice (authoritative, overwhelming). This theophanic vision overwhelms Daniel (v.8), demonstrating that encountering divine glory exceeds human capacity without divine enablement. The description establishes the message's authority—this isn't ordinary angelic visitation but direct divine revelation.
And I Daniel alone saw the vision: for the men that were with me saw not the vision; but a great quaking fell upon them, so that they fled to hide themselves.
View commentary
Daniel alone saw the vision while his companions didn't see it but 'a great quaking fell upon them, so that they fled to hide themselves.' This selective visibility parallels Paul's Damascus road experience (Acts 9:7, 22:9)—the divine encounter affects all present but reveals itself fully only to the chosen recipient. The companions' terror without seeing demonstrates that spiritual realities produce physical/emotional effects even on those not receiving direct revelation. Reformed theology affirms both common and special grace: God's general presence affects all, while special revelation targets specific recipients for specific purposes. The companions' fleeing shows appropriate response to divine presence, even when not fully perceiving it. Daniel's isolation emphasizes his unique prophetic calling.
Therefore I was left alone, and saw this great vision, and there remained no strength in me: for my comeliness was turned in me into corruption, and I retained no strength. comeliness: or, vigour
View commentary
Daniel's physical response: 'Therefore I was left alone, and saw this great vision, and there remained no strength in me: for my comeliness was turned in me into corruption, and I retained no strength.' The encounter completely overwhelmed him—loss of strength, physical corruption (possibly pallor, illness, or withering), total depletion. This parallels Isaiah 6:5 ('I am undone'), Ezekiel 1:28 (falling on face), and Revelation 1:17 (falling as dead). Encountering divine glory exceeds human capacity; even mature believers collapse under theophanic weight. The phrase 'great vision' emphasizes its significance and overwhelming nature. This teaches that genuine divine encounters humble rather than inflate—they reveal human weakness and God's transcendence. False visions or demonic counterfeits typically produce pride or confusion; genuine theophanies produce worship, fear, and physical collapse requiring divine strengthening for recovery.
Yet heard I the voice of his words: and when I heard the voice of his words, then was I in a deep sleep on my face, and my face toward the ground.
View commentary
The vision continues affecting Daniel: 'Yet heard I the voice of his words: and when I heard the voice of his words, then was I in a deep sleep on my face, and my face toward the ground.' Despite physical collapse, Daniel retains consciousness sufficient to hear the divine message. The 'deep sleep' (תַּרְדֵּמָה/tardemah) is supernatural—not normal sleep but divinely-induced state enabling reception of revelation beyond normal human capacity. This parallels Abraham's deep sleep during covenant ceremony (Genesis 15:12) and Adam's during Eve's creation (Genesis 2:21). The posture—face toward ground—demonstrates prostration and worship. Reformed theology affirms that God accommodates human weakness: when direct encounter would destroy, He induces states (deep sleep, visions, trances) enabling revelation while protecting the recipient. This demonstrates divine mercy in revelation.
And, behold, an hand touched me, which set me upon my knees and upon the palms of my hands. set: Heb. moved
View commentary
Divine intervention enables Daniel's recovery: 'And, behold, an hand touched me, which set me upon my knees and upon the palms of my hands.' The touch represents divine enablement—Daniel couldn't recover on his own but required supernatural assistance. Being set on hands and knees (not fully standing) indicates partial recovery—sufficient for continuing but still weak. This pattern appears throughout Scripture: Isaiah received coal-touched lips before speaking (Isaiah 6:6-7); Ezekiel received divine strength for ministry (Ezekiel 2:2); John received reassurance to overcome fear (Revelation 1:17). The pattern teaches that divine commissioning includes divine enabling—God doesn't merely command but provides strength to obey. Reformed theology emphasizes this: God's commands include grace to fulfill them; His call includes equipping.
And he said unto me, O Daniel, a man greatly beloved, understand the words that I speak unto thee, and stand upright: for unto thee am I now sent. And when he had spoken this word unto me, I stood trembling. greatly: Heb. of desires upright: Heb. upon thy standing
View commentary
The angel addresses Daniel: 'O Daniel, a man greatly beloved, understand the words that I speak unto thee, and stand upright: for unto thee am I now sent.' The designation 'man greatly beloved' (Hebrew אִישׁ חֲמֻדוֹת/ish chamudot, man of preciousness/delight) emphasizes God's particular affection for Daniel. This provides assurance amid the overwhelming encounter—fear not, you are beloved. The command to 'understand' emphasizes the message's importance; to 'stand upright' indicates the need for full attention and dignity. The phrase 'for unto thee am I now sent' establishes the angel's purpose: divine messenger bringing specific revelation for Daniel. This pattern—address, reassurance, command to attend, announcement of purpose—structures angelic communications throughout Scripture. The emphasis on understanding indicates the coming message requires careful attention and spiritual discernment.
Then said he unto me, Fear not, Daniel: for from the first day that thou didst set thine heart to understand, and to chasten thyself before thy God, thy words were heard, and I am come for thy words.
View commentary
The angelic messenger's opening words "Fear not, Daniel" address Daniel's overwhelming response to the glorious vision. Divine encounters regularly provoke fear, necessitating reassurance. The phrase "for from the first day" emphasizes the immediacy of God's response—prayer was heard the moment Daniel began seeking God, though the visible answer was delayed. "That thou didst set thine heart to understand" reveals Daniel's motivation—earnest desire for understanding God's purposes. "And to chasten thyself before thy God" describes Daniel's accompanying fasting and mourning, demonstrating humility and spiritual intensity.
"Thy words were heard" assures Daniel that prayer reached God's throne immediately, despite delayed manifestation. "And I am come for thy words" reveals the angel came specifically in response to Daniel's prayers. Verse 13 explains the delay: "the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days"—spiritual warfare in heavenly realms affected earthly timing. This passage reveals crucial truths: (1) God hears prayer immediately, though answers may be delayed; (2) spiritual warfare can affect timing of answered prayer; (3) persistent, humble prayer coupled with fasting demonstrates earnest faith; (4) delays don't indicate God's indifference but often involve spiritual realities beyond our perception.
This teaches perseverance in prayer and trust in God's perfect timing despite apparent delays. It demonstrates that prayer is genuine spiritual warfare influencing heavenly conflicts with earthly implications. Daniel's intercession contributed to Michael's victory over the prince of Persia, illustrating how human prayer participates in angelic conflict. This anticipates Christ's high priestly intercession and calls believers to persistent prayer with eternal perspective.
"Thy words were heard" assures Daniel that prayer reached God's throne immediately, despite delayed manifestation. "And I am come for thy words" reveals the angel came specifically in response to Daniel's prayers. Verse 13 explains the delay: "the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days"—spiritual warfare in heavenly realms affected earthly timing. This passage reveals crucial truths: (1) God hears prayer immediately, though answers may be delayed; (2) spiritual warfare can affect timing of answered prayer; (3) persistent, humble prayer coupled with fasting demonstrates earnest faith; (4) delays don't indicate God's indifference but often involve spiritual realities beyond our perception.
This teaches perseverance in prayer and trust in God's perfect timing despite apparent delays. It demonstrates that prayer is genuine spiritual warfare influencing heavenly conflicts with earthly implications. Daniel's intercession contributed to Michael's victory over the prince of Persia, illustrating how human prayer participates in angelic conflict. This anticipates Christ's high priestly intercession and calls believers to persistent prayer with eternal perspective.
But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia. chief: or, first
View commentary
This verse provides rare biblical insight into spiritual warfare's cosmic dimensions. The phrase "the prince of the Persian kingdom" refers to a demonic power exercising spiritual influence over the Persian Empire. The term "prince" (sar, שַׂר) indicates a ruling authority, here referring to an angelic or demonic being rather than human ruler. This reveals that earthly kingdoms have corresponding spiritual powers—fallen angels—that oppose God's purposes and influence national policies and cultures.
The statement "withstood me one and twenty days" indicates genuine spiritual conflict delayed the angel's mission to Daniel. The verb amad (עָמַד, "withstood") means "to stand against" or "oppose," suggesting active resistance and conflict. This wasn't mere disagreement but warfare hindering God's messenger from accomplishing his mission. The specific duration—twenty-one days—corresponds exactly to Daniel's fasting period (10:2-3), suggesting his persistent prayer influenced the conflict's outcome.
"But Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me" reveals angelic hierarchies and specializations. Michael is identified as "one of the chief princes" (achar hasar harishonim, אַחַר הַשָּׂרִים הָרִאשֹׁנִים), indicating highest rank among angelic beings. Michael specifically serves as Israel's protector (Daniel 12:1, Jude 9, Revelation 12:7). His intervention enabled the messenger angel to break through demonic opposition and reach Daniel. This demonstrates that spiritual warfare involves both human prayer and angelic assistance, working in concert to accomplish God's purposes.
The statement "withstood me one and twenty days" indicates genuine spiritual conflict delayed the angel's mission to Daniel. The verb amad (עָמַד, "withstood") means "to stand against" or "oppose," suggesting active resistance and conflict. This wasn't mere disagreement but warfare hindering God's messenger from accomplishing his mission. The specific duration—twenty-one days—corresponds exactly to Daniel's fasting period (10:2-3), suggesting his persistent prayer influenced the conflict's outcome.
"But Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me" reveals angelic hierarchies and specializations. Michael is identified as "one of the chief princes" (achar hasar harishonim, אַחַר הַשָּׂרִים הָרִאשֹׁנִים), indicating highest rank among angelic beings. Michael specifically serves as Israel's protector (Daniel 12:1, Jude 9, Revelation 12:7). His intervention enabled the messenger angel to break through demonic opposition and reach Daniel. This demonstrates that spiritual warfare involves both human prayer and angelic assistance, working in concert to accomplish God's purposes.
Now I am come to make thee understand what shall befall thy people in the latter days: for yet the vision is for many days.
View commentary
The angel explains the vision's purpose: 'Now I am come to make thee understand what shall befall thy people in the latter days: for yet the vision is for many days.' The message concerns Israel's future ('thy people') in 'latter days' (אַחֲרִית הַיָּמִים/acharit hayamim)—a prophetic term indicating end times or distant future. The phrase 'for yet the vision is for many days' emphasizes the prophecy's long-range scope—not immediate events but extending far into the future, ultimately to Messiah's time and beyond. This establishes chapter 11's detailed prophecy: it will trace Near Eastern geopolitics from Persian through Hellenistic periods, climaxing in Antiochus Epiphanes (who typifies Antichrist) and ultimately pointing to end-times fulfillment. Reformed eschatology sees Daniel's prophecies having both near and far fulfillment—immediate historical events typologically prefiguring ultimate eschatological realities.
And when he had spoken such words unto me, I set my face toward the ground, and I became dumb.
View commentary
Daniel's continued physical weakness: 'And when he had spoken such words unto me, I set my face toward the ground, and I became dumb.' The message's weight produces renewed prostration and speechlessness. This demonstrates that even with angelic reassurance and strengthening, the revelation's magnitude overwhelms. The inability to speak shows complete human inadequacy before divine revelation—Daniel literally has no words. This pattern appears throughout prophetic experience: Ezekiel made speechless (Ezekiel 3:26), Zechariah struck dumb (Luke 1:20), John overwhelmed by Revelation's visions (Revelation 1:17). The repeated cycles of strengthening and renewed weakness emphasize that sustained prophetic ministry requires continual divine enabling, not single empowerment.
And, behold, one like the similitude of the sons of men touched my lips: then I opened my mouth, and spake, and said unto him that stood before me, O my lord, by the vision my sorrows are turned upon me, and I have retained no strength.
View commentary
More divine assistance comes: 'And, behold, one like the similitude of the sons of men touched my lips: then I opened my mouth, and spake, and said unto him that stood before me, O my lord, by the vision my sorrows are turned upon me, and I have retained no strength.' The touch on Daniel's lips parallels Isaiah 6:6-7—divine enabling for speech. The description 'like the similitude of the sons of men' suggests human-like appearance (possibly the Angel of the LORD or another angel in human form). Daniel's restored speech immediately confesses continued weakness: 'my sorrows are turned upon me, and I have retained no strength.' The vision's weight produces sorrow (possibly from foreseeing Israel's future suffering) and physical depletion. This honest confession of weakness characterizes true spirituality—not pretending strength but acknowledging dependence on divine grace.
For how can the servant of this my lord talk with this my lord? for as for me, straightway there remained no strength in me, neither is there breath left in me. the: or, this servant of my lord
View commentary
Daniel expresses complete inadequacy: 'For how can the servant of this my lord talk with this my lord? for as for me, straightway there remained no strength in me, neither is there breath left in me.' This emphasizes the gap between divine and human: even strengthened, Daniel feels unable to converse with the glorious being. The rhetorical question 'how can the servant...talk with this my lord?' expresses wonder that communication is possible at all. The physical symptoms—no strength, no breath—indicate complete depletion. This teaches that divine-human encounter bridges an infinite gap, requiring divine initiative and grace. The encounter exhausts human capacity while revealing God's gracious accommodation. Reformed theology emphasizes this: revelation is divine condescension; God stoops to communicate with creatures who cannot reach Him.
Then there came again and touched me one like the appearance of a man, and he strengthened me,
View commentary
A third strengthening comes: 'Then there came again and touched me one like the appearance of a man, and he strengthened me.' The repeated need for strengthening emphasizes sustained revelation's requirements—not one-time empowerment but continual grace. Each wave of revelation requires renewed enabling. This pattern teaches that Christian life and ministry similarly require continual divine grace—not self-sustained effort but repeated infusions of divine strength. Paul's 'My grace is sufficient for thee: for my strength is made perfect in weakness' (2 Corinthians 12:9) reflects this principle. The 'one like the appearance of a man' may be the same figure as v.16 or indicate angelic form accommodated to human perception. The strengthening enables Daniel to continue receiving and eventually recording the revelation for God's people.
And said, O man greatly beloved, fear not: peace be unto thee, be strong, yea, be strong. And when he had spoken unto me, I was strengthened, and said, Let my lord speak; for thou hast strengthened me.
View commentary
The messenger reassures Daniel: 'And said, O man greatly beloved, fear not: peace be unto thee, be strong, yea, be strong.' The repeated 'man greatly beloved' provides assurance, while 'fear not' addresses Daniel's terror. The double command 'be strong, yea, be strong' intensifies the exhortation—requiring supernatural strength beyond natural capacity. Daniel's response shows the strengthening's effectiveness: 'And when he had spoken unto me, I was strengthened, and said, Let my lord speak; for thou hast strengthened me.' The divine word itself strengthens—God's commands include power to obey them. Daniel moves from collapsed incapacity to readiness to receive further revelation. This demonstrates that God prepares His servants for assigned tasks, providing sufficient grace for each requirement.
Then said he, Knowest thou wherefore I come unto thee? and now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come.
View commentary
The angel explains the spiritual warfare context: 'Knowest thou wherefore I come unto thee? and now will I return to fight with the prince of Persia: and when I am gone forth, lo, the prince of Grecia shall come.' This reveals the angelic conflict behind geopolitical events—earthly kingdoms have corresponding spiritual powers ('prince of Persia,' 'prince of Grecia'). The angel's need to return to spiritual battle indicates ongoing warfare. This teaches that human history's visible events reflect unseen spiritual realities. Reformed theology affirms both divine sovereignty and spiritual warfare: God rules absolutely, yet permits angelic/demonic activity within His determined purposes. The prince of Grecia's coming (after Persia) anticipates the historical transition from Persian to Greek dominance under Alexander (332 BC), showing God's foreknowledge and control of future geopolitics.
But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince. holdeth: Heb. strengtheneth himself
View commentary
The angel concludes: 'But I will shew thee that which is noted in the scripture of truth: and there is none that holdeth with me in these things, but Michael your prince.' The 'scripture of truth' (כְּתָב אֱמֶת/ketav emet) indicates a heavenly record of determined future events—God's sovereign decree written in His eternal counsel. This teaches divine foreknowledge and predestination: history unfolds according to God's predetermined plan. Michael, called 'your prince,' is Israel's angelic guardian (12:1, Jude 9, Revelation 12:7)—showing God assigns angelic protection to His people. The phrase 'none that holdeth with me...but Michael' indicates few allies in spiritual warfare against powerful demonic forces—most angels have other assignments; only Michael specifically aids this messenger. This reveals both spiritual warfare's reality and angelic organization under God's command.