King James Version

What Does Joshua 11:22 Mean?

Joshua 11:22 in the King James Version says “There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel: only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod, there re... — study this verse from Joshua chapter 11 with commentary, cross-references, and original Hebrew word analysis.

There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel: only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod, there remained.

Joshua 11:22 · KJV


Context

20

For it was of the LORD to harden their hearts, that they should come against Israel in battle, that he might destroy them utterly, and that they might have no favour, but that he might destroy them, as the LORD commanded Moses.

21

And at that time came Joshua, and cut off the Anakims from the mountains, from Hebron, from Debir, from Anab, and from all the mountains of Judah, and from all the mountains of Israel: Joshua destroyed them utterly with their cities.

22

There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel: only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod, there remained.

23

So Joshua took the whole land, according to all that the LORD said unto Moses; and Joshua gave it for an inheritance unto Israel according to their divisions by their tribes. And the land rested from war.


Commentary

KJV Study Commentary
There was none of the Anakims left in the land of the children of Israel—The Anakim's removal from Israelite territory was complete. The phrase land of the children of Israel (אֶרֶץ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל, eretz benei Yisra'el) defines the scope: territories Israel controlled, not necessarily all Canaan. Only in Gaza, in Gath, and in Ashdod, there remained—these Philistine coastal cities preserved Anakim remnants.

This geographical precision proves tragically prophetic. Gath later produced Goliath and his giant brothers (1 Samuel 17:4; 2 Samuel 21:15-22), demonstrating that incomplete conquest creates future problems. The Anakim's survival in Philistine territory shows Israel didn't fully execute God's command to eliminate these peoples. The theological principle: partial obedience leaves strongholds that later trouble God's people. The phrase there remained (נִשְׁאֲרוּ, nish'aru) uses the verb for remnant or survivor—what should have been completely destroyed persists as ongoing threat. New Testament application: besetting sins not thoroughly mortified (Colossians 3:5) remain to trouble believers, just as Anakim remnants later challenged Israel.

KJV Study — Public Domain

Historical & Cultural Context

The Philistine pentapolis (Gaza, Ashdod, Ashkelon, Gath, Ekron) controlled the southern coastal plain, a region Israel never fully conquered. These cities had different political structures and possibly ethnic composition than Canaanite city-states—the Philistines were Sea Peoples who arrived around the same time as Israel's conquest. The Anakim's refuge in Philistine territory may reflect Philistine military strength or Israel's failure to press conquest into coastal regions. Archaeological evidence shows Philistine cities flourished during the early Iron Age when Israel was settling the highlands. The giant warriors from Gath who troubled David's reign (2 Samuel 21:15-22) were likely Anakim descendants. Goliath himself is called 'the Philistine of Gath' (1 Samuel 17:23)—his extraordinary height (over nine feet, 1 Samuel 17:4) suggests Anakim ancestry. The incomplete conquest created ongoing conflict between Israel and Philistines that persisted through the monarchy period. This historical reality illustrates the spiritual principle that incomplete obedience to God's commands regarding sin creates persistent struggles.

Reflection Questions

  1. What 'giants' have you driven from most areas of your life but still harbor in certain 'cities' or specific contexts?
  2. How do 'Anakim' that remain in 'Philistine territory'—sins we tolerate in particular settings—later emerge as major threats like Goliath?
  3. What does incomplete conquest in Joshua's time teach about the importance of thorough obedience versus settling for partial victory?

Original Language Analysis

Hebrew · 11 words
לֹֽא1 of 11
H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

נוֹתַ֣ר2 of 11

left

H3498

to jut over or exceed; by implication, to excel; (intransitively) to remain or be left; causatively to leave, cause to abound, preserve

עֲנָקִ֔ים3 of 11

There was none of the Anakims

H6062

an anakite or descendant of anak

בְּאֶ֖רֶץ4 of 11

in the land

H776

the earth (at large, or partitively a land)

בְּנֵ֣י5 of 11

of the children

H1121

a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or

יִשְׂרָאֵ֑ל6 of 11

of Israel

H3478

he will rule as god; jisral, a symbolical name of jacob; also (typically) of his posterity

רַ֗ק7 of 11
H7535

properly, leanness, i.e., (figuratively) limitation; only adverbial, merely, or conjunctional, although

בְּעַזָּ֛ה8 of 11

only in Gaza

H5804

azzah, a place in palestine

בְּגַ֥ת9 of 11

in Gath

H1661

gath, a philistine city

וּבְאַשְׁדּ֖וֹד10 of 11

and in Ashdod

H795

ashdod, a place in palestine

נִשְׁאָֽרוּ׃11 of 11

there remained

H7604

properly, to swell up, i.e., be (causatively, make) redundant


Study Guide

Historical Context

This verse is found in the book of Joshua. Understanding the historical and cultural background helps illuminate its meaning for the original audience and for us today.

Theological Significance

Joshua 11:22 contributes to our understanding of God's character and His relationship with humanity. Consider how this verse connects to the broader themes of Scripture.

Cross-References

Verses related to Joshua 11:22 from Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

Places in This Verse

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study