About Ezra

Ezra records the return from exile and the rebuilding of the temple, followed by Ezra's ministry of spiritual restoration.

Author: EzraWritten: c. 450-400 BCReading time: ~2 minVerses: 15
RestorationTemple RebuildingLawPurityPrayerConfession

King James Version

Ezra 9

15 verses with commentary

Ezra's Prayer About Intermarriage

Now when these things were done, the princes came to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests, and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands, doing according to their abominations, even of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites.

View commentary
The phrase 'when these things were done' marks transition from travel narrative to spiritual crisis. The 'princes' who approached Ezra demonstrate that knowledge of sin came from within the leadership, not external accusation. The accusation—'have not separated themselves from the people of the lands'—identifies the core problem: failure to maintain covenant distinctiveness. The catalogue of nations ('Canaanites, Hittites,' etc.) echoes Deuteronomy 7:1-3's prohibited peoples. The specific mention of 'abominations' (to'evot) indicates not just cultural mixing but adoption of pagan religious practices that God declared detestable. The climactic statement 'yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass' reveals that leaders led in covenant breaking.

For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass.

View commentary
The crisis of intermarriage: 'For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass.' The phrase 'holy seed' (zera ha-qodesh) refers to Israel, set apart for God (Exodus 19:6, Deuteronomy 7:6). 'Mingled' (hit'arevu) indicates mixing that compromises distinctiveness—marriage with pagans threatened covenant identity because it typically led to idolatry (as Solomon's case proved, 1 Kings 11:1-8). The prohibition wasn't racial but theological: preventing syncretism (Deuteronomy 7:3-4). That 'princes and rulers' led this sin aggravates it—leaders modeling covenant breaking. Ezra's response (9:3-15) shows anguish over sin threatening the restored community's spiritual integrity. This principle applies: believers shouldn't form primary bonds with unbelievers where spiritual compromise is likely (2 Corinthians 6:14).

And when I heard this thing, I rent my garment and my mantle, and plucked off the hair of my head and of my beard, and sat down astonied.

View commentary
Ezra's emotional devastation intensified: 'I sat down astonied until the evening sacrifice.' The word 'astonied' (Hebrew shamem) means desolated, appalled, devastated. He remained in this state for hours—from when he heard the news until 3 PM (evening sacrifice time). This prolonged grief demonstrates the seriousness of sin in godly perspective. Ezra didn't quickly move past shock to pragmatic problem-solving but deeply felt the offense against God. This models appropriate pastoral grief over congregational sin.

Then were assembled unto me every one that trembled at the words of the God of Israel, because of the transgression of those that had been carried away; and I sat astonied until the evening sacrifice.

View commentary
The gathering: 'Then were assembled unto me every one that trembled at the words of the God of Israel, because of the transgression of those that had been carried away.' The phrase 'trembled at the words of God' describes those who take Scripture seriously with appropriate fear. These gathered supporters felt proper horror at covenant violation. Their assembly around Ezra demonstrates that spiritual leadership attracts those with similar godly values. The contrast 'those that had been carried away' (returned exiles) had committed this sin—even those who should know better from exile experience.

And at the evening sacrifice I arose up from my heaviness; and having rent my garment and my mantle, I fell upon my knees, and spread out my hands unto the LORD my God, heaviness: or, affliction

View commentary
The 'evening sacrifice' (about 3 PM) was one of the two daily tamid offerings. Ezra chose this time deliberately—when the community gathered for sacrifice, his public prayer would have maximum impact and participation. Rising 'from my heaviness' (Hebrew ta'anit, meaning humiliation/affliction) shows Ezra emerging from mourning to intercession. His posture—'fell upon my knees, and spread out my hands unto the LORD my God'—combines physical humility (kneeling) with supplication (spread hands). This embodied prayer demonstrates that physical posture can appropriately express heart attitude. Ezra's personal identification—'my God'—shows intimate relationship even while confessing corporate sin. The prayer that follows is one of Scripture's great penitential prayers.

And said, O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee, my God: for our iniquities are increased over our head, and our trespass is grown up unto the heavens. trespass: or, guiltiness

View commentary
Ezra's prayer begins with profound shame: 'O my God, I am ashamed and blush to lift up my face to thee, my God.' The repetition 'my God... my God' emphasizes personal relationship even amid corporate guilt. The verb 'ashamed' (bosh) carries sense of humiliation and disgrace. Ezra feels personal shame for corporate sin, demonstrating identificational repentance—though not personally guilty of intermarriage, he identifies with his people's guilt. The metaphor 'our iniquities are increased over our head' pictures sin accumulating like rising water. The parallel 'our trespass is grown up unto the heavens' emphasizes the enormity of guilt before God. This language doesn't quantify individual sins but expresses overwhelming sense of covenant violation.

Since the days of our fathers have we been in a great trespass unto this day; and for our iniquities have we, our kings, and our priests, been delivered into the hand of the kings of the lands, to the sword, to captivity, and to a spoil, and to confusion of face, as it is this day.

View commentary
Ezra's prayer continues with historical confession: 'Since the days of our fathers have we been in a great trespass unto this day.' This acknowledges multi-generational sin—current violations aren't isolated failures but ongoing patterns. The phrase 'for our iniquities have we, our kings, and our priests, been delivered into the hand of the kings of the lands' interprets exile theologically. God used pagan rulers to judge covenant violation. The list of punishments—'to the sword, to captivity, and to a spoil, and to confusion of face'—recounts covenant curses (Leviticus 26, Deuteronomy 28).

And now for a little space grace hath been shewed from the LORD our God, to leave us a remnant to escape, and to give us a nail in his holy place, that our God may lighten our eyes, and give us a little reviving in our bondage. space: Heb. moment a nail: or, a pin: that is, a constant and sure abode

View commentary
Ezra acknowledges recent mercy: 'And now for a little space grace hath been shewed from the LORD our God, to leave us a remnant to escape, and to give us a nail in his holy place.' The phrase 'little space' (brief time) contrasts seventy years exile with recent restoration. The word 'grace' (techinnah) emphasizes unmerited favor. The 'remnant' theology acknowledges that only a portion returned and only divine mercy preserved them. The metaphor 'nail in his holy place' suggests something secure and permanent—God gave them place in Jerusalem despite unworthiness.

For we were bondmen; yet our God hath not forsaken us in our bondage, but hath extended mercy unto us in the sight of the kings of Persia, to give us a reviving, to set up the house of our God, and to repair the desolations thereof, and to give us a wall in Judah and in Jerusalem. to repair: Heb. to set up

View commentary
The confession continues: 'For we were bondmen; yet our God hath not forsaken us in our bondage, but hath extended mercy unto us in the sight of the kings of Persia.' The term 'bondmen' acknowledges ongoing subjection—they weren't independent but lived under Persian rule. Yet God's faithfulness operated even in bondage. The phrase 'extended mercy unto us in the sight of the kings of Persia' attributes Cyrus's, Darius's, and Artaxerxes' favor to divine action. The purpose: 'to give us a reviving, to set up the house of our God, and to repair the desolations thereof, and to give us a wall in Judah and in Jerusalem.'

And now, O our God, what shall we say after this? for we have forsaken thy commandments,

View commentary
The rhetorical question: 'And now, O our God, what shall we say after this? for we have forsaken thy commandments.' This acknowledges speechlessness before God—what defense can be offered after receiving mercy? The confession 'we have forsaken thy commandments' admits willful violation, not ignorant mistake. This is covenant breaking, not mere failure. The question format demonstrates that genuine repentance recognizes it has no excuse, no justification, no mitigation to plead. Standing guilty before God with no defense is the beginning of true repentance.

Which thou hast commanded by thy servants the prophets, saying, The land, unto which ye go to possess it, is an unclean land with the filthiness of the people of the lands, with their abominations, which have filled it from one end to another with their uncleanness. by: Heb. by the hand of from: Heb. from mouth to mouth

View commentary
Ezra quotes divine prohibition: 'Which thou hast commanded by thy servants the prophets, saying, The land, unto which ye go to possess it, is an unclean land with the filthiness of the people of the lands, with their abominations.' This cites prophetic warnings (not direct Moses quotations but summarizing themes from Leviticus 18, Deuteronomy 7). The land's 'uncleanness' came from inhabitants' practices. The phrase 'which have filled it from one end to another with their uncleanness' pictures complete pollution. God warned against assimilating such practices.

Now therefore give not your daughters unto their sons, neither take their daughters unto your sons, nor seek their peace or their wealth for ever: that ye may be strong, and eat the good of the land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children for ever.

View commentary
The prohibition continues: 'Now therefore give not your daughters unto their sons, neither take their daughters unto your sons, nor seek their peace or their wealth for ever.' This quotes the principle from Deuteronomy 7:3 and 23:6. The prohibition extended beyond marriage to political alliance ('seek their peace') and economic partnership ('their wealth'). The phrase 'for ever' shows this wasn't temporary strategy but permanent principle of covenant distinctiveness. The purpose: 'that ye may be strong, and eat the good of the land, and leave it for an inheritance to your children for ever.'

And after all that is come upon us for our evil deeds, and for our great trespass, seeing that thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve, and hast given us such deliverance as this; hast punished: Heb. hast withheld beneath our iniquities

View commentary
Ezra acknowledges deserved judgment: 'And after all that is come upon us for our evil deeds, and for our great trespass, seeing that thou our God hast punished us less than our iniquities deserve, and hast given us such deliverance as this.' This profound theology recognizes that exile, though severe, was actually restrained judgment. Total annihilation would be just; survival is mercy. The word 'deliverance' (peleytah, remnant/escaped portion) emphasizes that existence itself is undeserved grace. This prevents both presumption and despair.

Should we again break thy commandments, and join in affinity with the people of these abominations? wouldest not thou be angry with us till thou hadst consumed us, so that there should be no remnant nor escaping?

View commentary
The climactic question: 'Should we again break thy commandments, and join in affinity with the people of these abominations? wouldest not thou be angry with us till thou hadst consumed us, so that there should be no remnant nor escaping?' The word 'again' emphasizes repeating previously judged sins. The rhetorical question acknowledges that persistent covenant breaking invites complete destruction. The phrase 'till thou hadst consumed us' recognizes God's justice would warrant total annihilation. This isn't manipulation but sober recognition of what renewed sin deserves. The final phrase 'no remnant nor escaping' pictures complete destruction.

O LORD God of Israel, thou art righteous: for we remain yet escaped, as it is this day: behold, we are before thee in our trespasses: for we cannot stand before thee because of this.

View commentary
Ezra concludes his prayer with confession of God's righteousness: 'O LORD God of Israel, thou art righteous.' This acknowledgment is crucial—even while appealing for mercy, Ezra affirms God's just character. The phrase 'we remain yet escaped, as it is this day' emphasizes that their continued existence is grace, not entitlement. The corporate confession 'behold, we are before thee in our trespasses' pictures standing in God's presence as guilty defendants. The final acknowledgment 'we cannot stand before thee because of this' uses legal terminology—they have no case, no defense, no righteousness to plead. This is thoroughly Reformed theology: total inability, complete guilt before holy God, and appeal to mercy alone. Ezra doesn't bargain or make excuses—he simply confesses truth and throws the community on God's mercy.

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study