King James Version

What Does Joshua 14:4 Mean?

Joshua 14:4 in the King James Version says “For the children of Joseph were two tribes, Manasseh and Ephraim: therefore they gave no part unto the Levites in the la...” — study this verse from Joshua chapter 14 with commentary, cross-references, and original Hebrew word analysis.

“For the children of Joseph were two tribes, Manasseh and Ephraim: therefore they gave no part unto the Levites in the land, save cities to dwell in, with their suburbs for their cattle and for their substance.”

Joshua 14:4 · KJV

Salvation

Context

2

By lot was their inheritance, as the LORD commanded by the hand of Moses, for the nine tribes, and for the half tribe.

3

For Moses had given the inheritance of two tribes and an half tribe on the other side Jordan: but unto the Levites he gave none inheritance among them.

4

For the children of Joseph were two tribes, Manasseh and Ephraim: therefore they gave no part unto the Levites in the land, save cities to dwell in, with their suburbs for their cattle and for their substance.

5

As the LORD commanded Moses, so the children of Israel did, and they divided the land.

6

Then the children of Judah came unto Joshua in Gilgal: and Caleb the son of Jephunneh the Kenezite said unto him, Thou knowest the thing that the LORD said unto Moses the man of God concerning me and thee in Kadeshbarnea.

Read Joshua 14 full chapter

Commentary

KJV Study Commentary
Joseph's double portion: 'For the children of Joseph were two tribes, Manasseh and Ephraim: therefore they gave no part unto the Levites in the land, save cities to dwell in, with their suburbs for their cattle and for their substance.' Joseph's blessing through his two sons receiving tribal status (Genesis 48:5) meant he effectively got double portion—firstborn's inheritance despite Reuben's biological priority. This fulfilled Jacob's elevation of Ephraim and Manasseh to tribal status (Genesis 48:5). With Levi not receiving territory, the twelve territorial tribes became: Reuben, Simeon, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Asher, Benjamin, Ephraim, Manasseh. The provision for Levitical cities with pasturelands shows practical care—while not owning territory, Levites needed living space and capacity to keep some livestock for family support. This balance between 'God as inheritance' and practical provision models kingdom living: spiritual priority without despising physical needs.

KJV Study — Public Domain

Historical & Cultural Context

Jacob's adoption of Joseph's sons (Genesis 48) created the legal mechanism for Joseph's double portion—compensation for his suffering and faithfulness during brothers' betrayal and Egyptian exile. This elevation also meant firstborn's privilege (double portion, Deuteronomy 21:17) went to Joseph rather than Reuben, who forfeited it through sin (Genesis 49:3-4). The twelve-tribe structure remained constant despite variations in lists: sometimes Joseph counted as one (with Ephraim/Manasseh as sub-units), sometimes as two (with Levi excluded), sometimes Levi included with Joseph as one. The forty-eight Levitical cities (chapter 21) with surrounding pasturelands provided practical support. Archaeological evidence shows some of these cities were fortified, serving dual religious and defensive purposes. The Levitical cities' distribution throughout Israel ensured religious instruction was geographically accessible, preventing centralization that might breed corruption. This dispersed clergy model influenced later Protestant emphases on distributed ministerial presence.

Reflection Questions

  1. How does Joseph's double portion (reward for faithfulness through suffering) encourage perseverance during unjust treatment?
  2. What does balancing spiritual priority (God as inheritance) with practical provision (cities and pasturelands) teach about holistic kingdom living?
  3. How should ministry structures balance spiritual calling with practical needs of those serving?

Original Language Analysis

Hebrew · 20 words
כִּֽי1 of 20
H3588

(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed

הָי֧וּ2 of 20
H1961

to exist, i.e., be or become, come to pass (always emphatic, and not a mere copula or auxiliary)

בְנֵֽי3 of 20

“For the children”

H1121

a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or

יוֹסֵ֛ף4 of 20

“of Joseph”

H3130

joseph, the name of seven israelites

שְׁנֵ֥י5 of 20

“were two”

H8147

two; also (as ordinal) twofold

מַטּ֖וֹת6 of 20

“tribes”

H4294

a branch (as extending); figuratively, a tribe; also a rod, whether for chastising (figuratively, correction), ruling (a sceptre), throwing (a lance),

מְנַשֶּׁ֣ה7 of 20

“Manasseh”

H4519

menashsheh, a grandson of jacob, also the tribe descended from him, and its territory

וְאֶפְרָ֑יִם8 of 20

“and Ephraim”

H669

ephrajim, a son of joseph; also the tribe descended from him, and its territory

וְלֹֽא9 of 20
H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

נָתְנוּ֩10 of 20

“therefore they gave”

H5414

to give, used with greatest latitude of application (put, make, etc.)

חֵ֨לֶק11 of 20

“no part”

H2506

properly, smoothness (of the tongue)

לַלְוִיִּ֜ם12 of 20

“unto the Levites”

H3881

a levite or descendant of levi

בָּאָ֗רֶץ13 of 20

“in the land”

H776

the earth (at large, or partitively a land)

כִּ֤י14 of 20
H3588

(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed

אִם15 of 20
H518

used very widely as demonstrative, lo!; interrogative, whether?; or conditional, if, although; also oh that!, when; hence, as a negative, not

עָרִים֙16 of 20

“save cities”

H5892

a city (a place guarded by waking or a watch) in the widest sense (even of a mere encampment or post)

לָשֶׁ֔בֶת17 of 20

“to dwell”

H3427

properly, to sit down (specifically as judge. in ambush, in quiet); by implication, to dwell, to remain; causatively, to settle, to marry

וּמִ֨גְרְשֵׁיהֶ֔ם18 of 20

“in with their suburbs”

H4054

a suburb (i.e., open country whither flocks are driven from pasture); hence, the area around a building, or the margin of the sea

לְמִקְנֵיהֶ֖ם19 of 20

“for their cattle”

H4735

something bought, i.e., property, but only live stock; abstractly, acquisition

וּלְקִנְיָנָֽם׃20 of 20

“and for their substance”

H7075

creation, i.e., (concretely) creatures; also acquisition, purchase, wealth

Study Guide

Historical Context

This verse is found in the book of Joshua. Understanding the historical and cultural background helps illuminate its meaning for the original audience and for us today.

Theological Significance

Joshua 14:4 contributes to our understanding of God's character and His relationship with humanity. Consider how this verse connects to the broader themes of Scripture.

Cross-References

Verses related to Joshua 14:4 from Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

Genesis 48:51 Chronicles 5:1-21 Chronicles 6:54-81Numbers 35:2-8Joshua 21:2-42

Test Your Knowledge

Joshua 14 QuizTest your knowledge of this chapterJoshua Book QuizComprehensive quiz for the entire book

Continue Your Study

Read Joshua 14 with CommentaryAll Joshua ChaptersComplete Joshua QuizBible CharactersNave's Topical BibleAll Bible Quizzes