King James Version
Zechariah 11
17 verses with commentary
The Shepherds of Israel
Open thy doors, O Lebanon, that the fire may devour thy cedars.
View commentary
Open thy doors, O Lebanon, that the fire may devour thy cedars. This prophetic lament opens Zechariah's parable of the two shepherds with ominous imagery. "Lebanon" (Levanon, לְבָנוֹן) represents the pride and glory of Israel—its majestic cedars symbolized strength, beauty, and royal splendor (1 Kings 5:6; Psalm 92:12). The command to "open thy doors" (petach dlatekha, פְּתַח דְּלָתֶיךָ) indicates inevitable judgment—the forests must open themselves to consuming fire.
"That the fire may devour" (ve-tokhal esh, וְתֹאכַל אֵשׁ) speaks of complete destruction. Fire in prophetic literature represents divine judgment (Isaiah 66:15-16; Malachi 4:1). The cedars—tall, noble, seemingly indestructible—will be consumed. This imagery prophesies the coming devastation of Jerusalem and the temple (fulfilled in AD 70 when Rome destroyed the city). Josephus records that the temple's cedar-paneled interior burned magnificently, fulfilling this very image.
The verse introduces the shepherd allegory that follows, where Israel's rejection of God's Good Shepherd leads to judgment. The cedars of Lebanon were used in Solomon's temple (1 Kings 6:9-18), so their burning symbolizes the destruction of that which represented God's presence. The connection to the New Testament is clear: Jesus, the Good Shepherd, was rejected, leading to the destruction of the second temple within a generation.
"That the fire may devour" (ve-tokhal esh, וְתֹאכַל אֵשׁ) speaks of complete destruction. Fire in prophetic literature represents divine judgment (Isaiah 66:15-16; Malachi 4:1). The cedars—tall, noble, seemingly indestructible—will be consumed. This imagery prophesies the coming devastation of Jerusalem and the temple (fulfilled in AD 70 when Rome destroyed the city). Josephus records that the temple's cedar-paneled interior burned magnificently, fulfilling this very image.
The verse introduces the shepherd allegory that follows, where Israel's rejection of God's Good Shepherd leads to judgment. The cedars of Lebanon were used in Solomon's temple (1 Kings 6:9-18), so their burning symbolizes the destruction of that which represented God's presence. The connection to the New Testament is clear: Jesus, the Good Shepherd, was rejected, leading to the destruction of the second temple within a generation.
Howl, fir tree; for the cedar is fallen; because the mighty are spoiled: howl, O ye oaks of Bashan; for the forest of the vintage is come down. mighty: or, gallants the forest: or, the defenced forest
View commentary
Howl, fir tree; for the cedar is fallen; because the mighty are spoiled: howl, O ye oaks of Bashan; for the forest of the vintage is come down. This verse extends the lament, using parallel tree imagery to depict comprehensive judgment. The "fir tree" (berosh, בְּרוֹשׁ, likely cypress) is commanded to "howl" (yalel, יָלֵל)—wail in mourning—because the superior cedar has fallen. If the mighty cedar cannot stand, how shall the lesser trees survive?
The phrase "the mighty are spoiled" (addirim shuddadu, אַדִּרִים שֻׁדָּדוּ) moves from botanical metaphor to direct statement: the powerful, noble ones are devastated. "Spoiled" means plundered, destroyed, laid waste. The "oaks of Bashan" (allonei Bashan, אַלּוֹנֵי בָשָׁן) were famous for their strength and size (Isaiah 2:13; Ezekiel 27:6). Bashan, east of the Jordan, was known for its fertile plains and massive oaks used in shipbuilding. Their "forest of the vintage" (ya'ar ha-batzir, יַעַר הַבָּצִיר)—the dense, impenetrable forest—has "come down," meaning been cut down or destroyed.
The escalating imagery from cedars to firs to oaks depicts total devastation across the land. This prophesies the comprehensive judgment falling on Israel's leadership (the "mighty") when they reject God's Shepherd. Jesus wept over Jerusalem, foreseeing this very destruction (Luke 19:41-44).
The phrase "the mighty are spoiled" (addirim shuddadu, אַדִּרִים שֻׁדָּדוּ) moves from botanical metaphor to direct statement: the powerful, noble ones are devastated. "Spoiled" means plundered, destroyed, laid waste. The "oaks of Bashan" (allonei Bashan, אַלּוֹנֵי בָשָׁן) were famous for their strength and size (Isaiah 2:13; Ezekiel 27:6). Bashan, east of the Jordan, was known for its fertile plains and massive oaks used in shipbuilding. Their "forest of the vintage" (ya'ar ha-batzir, יַעַר הַבָּצִיר)—the dense, impenetrable forest—has "come down," meaning been cut down or destroyed.
The escalating imagery from cedars to firs to oaks depicts total devastation across the land. This prophesies the comprehensive judgment falling on Israel's leadership (the "mighty") when they reject God's Shepherd. Jesus wept over Jerusalem, foreseeing this very destruction (Luke 19:41-44).
There is a voice of the howling of the shepherds; for their glory is spoiled: a voice of the roaring of young lions; for the pride of Jordan is spoiled.
View commentary
There is a voice of the howling of the shepherds; for their glory is spoiled: a voice of the roaring of young lions; for the pride of Jordan is spoiled. The lament shifts from trees to "shepherds" (ro'im, רֹעִים) and "young lions" (kephirim, כְּפִרִים), both representing Israel's leaders. The "howling" (yelalah, יְלָלָה) and "roaring" (sha'agah, שַׁאֲגָה) are cries of anguish—the leaders who should have protected God's flock now wail over their own destruction.
"For their glory is spoiled" (ki shuddad adartem, כִּי שֻׁדַּד אַדַּרְתָּם) explains the shepherds' anguish: their majesty, honor, and authority are devastated. The term adarah can mean a glorious robe or mantle (1 Kings 19:13, 19), symbolizing office and authority. Israel's shepherds (kings, priests, prophets) will lose their positions and prestige. The "pride of Jordan" (ge'on ha-Yarden, גְּאוֹן הַיַּרְדֵּן) refers to the Jordan River's thickets where lions once dwelled (Jeremiah 49:19; 50:44). Even the lions' impenetrable refuge is destroyed.
This verse connects the botanical imagery (vv. 1-2) with the shepherd allegory that follows (vv. 4-17). Israel's leaders—the shepherds who should feed the flock—have failed, leading to national judgment. Jesus explicitly condemned the religious leaders of His day as false shepherds (Matthew 23; John 10:12-13).
"For their glory is spoiled" (ki shuddad adartem, כִּי שֻׁדַּד אַדַּרְתָּם) explains the shepherds' anguish: their majesty, honor, and authority are devastated. The term adarah can mean a glorious robe or mantle (1 Kings 19:13, 19), symbolizing office and authority. Israel's shepherds (kings, priests, prophets) will lose their positions and prestige. The "pride of Jordan" (ge'on ha-Yarden, גְּאוֹן הַיַּרְדֵּן) refers to the Jordan River's thickets where lions once dwelled (Jeremiah 49:19; 50:44). Even the lions' impenetrable refuge is destroyed.
This verse connects the botanical imagery (vv. 1-2) with the shepherd allegory that follows (vv. 4-17). Israel's leaders—the shepherds who should feed the flock—have failed, leading to national judgment. Jesus explicitly condemned the religious leaders of His day as false shepherds (Matthew 23; John 10:12-13).
The Two Shepherds
Thus saith the LORD my God; Feed the flock of the slaughter;
View commentary
Thus saith the LORD my God; Feed the flock of the slaughter. God commissions the prophet (representing the Messianic Shepherd) to "feed the flock of the slaughter" (re'eh et-tson ha-haregah, רְעֵה אֶת־צֹאן הַהֲרֵגָה). The term haregah means slaughter, killing—these sheep are doomed, destined for destruction. The phrase recalls Isaiah 53:7: "He is brought as a lamb to the slaughter." This flock represents Israel under corrupt leadership, heading toward judgment.
The command "Feed" (re'eh, רְעֵה) means to shepherd, tend, pasture—providing care, guidance, and protection. God sends a faithful shepherd to this doomed flock, offering them one final opportunity for salvation. This is Christ's ministry to Israel: "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 15:24). Jesus came to feed and save the flock heading toward slaughter (the destruction of AD 70).
The phrase "Thus saith the LORD my God" establishes divine authority for this mission. The prophet speaks as representative of the true Shepherd who comes on God's commission. This is an enacted prophecy, where Zechariah performs symbolic actions representing the Messiah's future work among Israel.
The command "Feed" (re'eh, רְעֵה) means to shepherd, tend, pasture—providing care, guidance, and protection. God sends a faithful shepherd to this doomed flock, offering them one final opportunity for salvation. This is Christ's ministry to Israel: "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel" (Matthew 15:24). Jesus came to feed and save the flock heading toward slaughter (the destruction of AD 70).
The phrase "Thus saith the LORD my God" establishes divine authority for this mission. The prophet speaks as representative of the true Shepherd who comes on God's commission. This is an enacted prophecy, where Zechariah performs symbolic actions representing the Messiah's future work among Israel.
Whose possessors slay them, and hold themselves not guilty: and they that sell them say, Blessed be the LORD; for I am rich: and their own shepherds pity them not.
View commentary
Whose possessors slay them, and hold themselves not guilty: and they that sell them say, Blessed be the LORD; for I am rich: and their own shepherds pity them not. This verse describes the appalling exploitation of God's flock by their supposed caretakers. "Whose possessors slay them" (asher qoneihem yahargum, אֲשֶׁר קֹנֵיהֶם יַהַרְגֻם) depicts owners who kill their own sheep for profit—viewing them as commodities, not living souls entrusted to their care.
"And hold themselves not guilty" (ve-lo ye'shamu, וְלֹא יֶאְשָׁמוּ) reveals their moral blindness: they feel no guilt for destroying those in their charge. They exploit God's people while claiming righteousness. "They that sell them say, Blessed be the LORD; for I am rich" combines religious hypocrisy with greed—thanking God while profiting from God's people's suffering. This describes religious leaders who use their positions for financial gain while displaying outward piety.
"Their own shepherds pity them not" (ve-ro'eihem lo yachmol aleihem, וְרֹעֵיהֶם לֹא יַחְמוֹל עֲלֵיהֶם) is the devastating climax: those called to shepherd have no compassion. The word chamal means to spare, show mercy, have compassion. Israel's leaders are completely devoid of pastoral concern. This describes the Pharisees and religious elite of Jesus's day who "devour widows' houses" (Matthew 23:14) and "bind heavy burdens on men's shoulders" (Matthew 23:4).
"And hold themselves not guilty" (ve-lo ye'shamu, וְלֹא יֶאְשָׁמוּ) reveals their moral blindness: they feel no guilt for destroying those in their charge. They exploit God's people while claiming righteousness. "They that sell them say, Blessed be the LORD; for I am rich" combines religious hypocrisy with greed—thanking God while profiting from God's people's suffering. This describes religious leaders who use their positions for financial gain while displaying outward piety.
"Their own shepherds pity them not" (ve-ro'eihem lo yachmol aleihem, וְרֹעֵיהֶם לֹא יַחְמוֹל עֲלֵיהֶם) is the devastating climax: those called to shepherd have no compassion. The word chamal means to spare, show mercy, have compassion. Israel's leaders are completely devoid of pastoral concern. This describes the Pharisees and religious elite of Jesus's day who "devour widows' houses" (Matthew 23:14) and "bind heavy burdens on men's shoulders" (Matthew 23:4).
For I will no more pity the inhabitants of the land, saith the LORD: but, lo, I will deliver the men every one into his neighbour's hand, and into the hand of his king: and they shall smite the land, and out of their hand I will not deliver them. deliver: Heb. make to be found
View commentary
For I will no more pity the inhabitants of the land, saith the LORD: but, lo, I will deliver the men every one into his neighbour's hand, and into the hand of his king: and they shall smite the land, and out of their hand I will not deliver them. This verse announces God's judgment on Israel for rejecting the Good Shepherd. "I will no more pity" (lo echmos, לֹא אֶחְמוֹל) uses the same verb (chamal) from verse 5—as the shepherds showed no pity, God will withdraw His pity.
"I will deliver the men every one into his neighbour's hand" describes civil strife and internal conflict. Josephus's account of Jerusalem's siege (AD 66-70) records horrific factional warfare among the Jews themselves—Zealots, Sicarii, and others fought each other even as Rome besieged the city. Families turned against each other; neighbor betrayed neighbor. Jesus prophesied this: "Brother shall betray the brother to death, and the father the son" (Mark 13:12).
"And into the hand of his king" refers to foreign domination—Rome's authority over Judea. "They shall smite the land, and out of their hand I will not deliver them" promises God will not intervene to save them from the consequences of rejecting His Shepherd. This is judicial abandonment—God giving them over to their choice. Paul describes similar divine judgment in Romans 1:24, 26, 28: "God gave them up."
"I will deliver the men every one into his neighbour's hand" describes civil strife and internal conflict. Josephus's account of Jerusalem's siege (AD 66-70) records horrific factional warfare among the Jews themselves—Zealots, Sicarii, and others fought each other even as Rome besieged the city. Families turned against each other; neighbor betrayed neighbor. Jesus prophesied this: "Brother shall betray the brother to death, and the father the son" (Mark 13:12).
"And into the hand of his king" refers to foreign domination—Rome's authority over Judea. "They shall smite the land, and out of their hand I will not deliver them" promises God will not intervene to save them from the consequences of rejecting His Shepherd. This is judicial abandonment—God giving them over to their choice. Paul describes similar divine judgment in Romans 1:24, 26, 28: "God gave them up."
And I will feed the flock of slaughter, even you, O poor of the flock. And I took unto me two staves; the one I called Beauty, and the other I called Bands; and I fed the flock. even: or, verily the poor Bands: or, Binders
View commentary
And I will feed the flock of slaughter, even you, O poor of the flock. And I took unto me two staves; the one I called Beauty, and the other I called Bands; and I fed the flock. The shepherd (representing Messiah) accepts the commission to feed the doomed flock, specifically addressing "the poor of the flock" (aniyyei ha-tson, עֲנִיֵּי הַצֹּאן)—the humble, afflicted, lowly ones who recognize their need. These are the anawim, the pious poor who await God's deliverance, contrasted with the proud religious elite. Jesus's ministry focused on these: "Blessed are the poor in spirit" (Matthew 5:3); "The poor have the gospel preached to them" (Matthew 11:5).
The shepherd takes "two staves" (shnei maqlot, שְׁנֵי מַקְלוֹת)—a shepherd's tools representing his ministry. One is called "Beauty" (No'am, נֹעַם), meaning pleasantness, favor, grace—representing God's covenant favor and gracious relationship with His people. The other is called "Bands" (Chovelim, חֹבְלִים), meaning union, bonds—representing the unity between Judah and Israel, or the bond between God and His people.
"And I fed the flock" describes Christ's ministry: teaching, healing, calling disciples. For three years Jesus faithfully shepherded Israel, offering salvation to all who would receive Him, especially the "poor in spirit" who recognized their need.
The shepherd takes "two staves" (shnei maqlot, שְׁנֵי מַקְלוֹת)—a shepherd's tools representing his ministry. One is called "Beauty" (No'am, נֹעַם), meaning pleasantness, favor, grace—representing God's covenant favor and gracious relationship with His people. The other is called "Bands" (Chovelim, חֹבְלִים), meaning union, bonds—representing the unity between Judah and Israel, or the bond between God and His people.
"And I fed the flock" describes Christ's ministry: teaching, healing, calling disciples. For three years Jesus faithfully shepherded Israel, offering salvation to all who would receive Him, especially the "poor in spirit" who recognized their need.
Three shepherds also I cut off in one month; and my soul lothed them, and their soul also abhorred me. lothed: Heb. was straightened for them
View commentary
Three shepherds also I cut off in one month; and my soul lothed them, and their soul also abhorred me. This cryptic verse describes the shepherd's action against corrupt leadership. "Three shepherds also I cut off in one month" (va-akhchid et-sheloshet ha-ro'im be-yerach echad, וָאַכְחִיד אֶת־שְׁלֹשֶׁת הָרֹעִים בְּיֶרַח אֶחָד) has generated extensive interpretation. The "three shepherds" likely represent categories of Israel's leadership: prophets, priests, and kings/rulers—or perhaps Pharisees, Sadducees, and scribes in Jesus's day. "Cut off" means destroyed, removed from office, rendered powerless.
"In one month" suggests swift, decisive action within a short time period. This could refer to Jesus's final confrontation with the religious leaders during His last Passover week, when He systematically exposed and condemned their hypocrisy (Matthew 21-23). Or it may point to the rapid collapse of Israel's leadership system after AD 70 when the temple, priesthood, and Sanhedrin all ended permanently.
"My soul lothed them, and their soul also abhorred me" (va-tiktzar nafshi bahem ve-gam nafsham ba'alah oti, וַתִּקְצַר נַפְשִׁי בָּהֶם וְגַם־נַפְשָׁם בָּעֲלָה אֹתִי) describes mutual rejection. The shepherd's soul grew impatient/weary with their wickedness (qatzar can mean shortened, impatient, disgusted). They in turn abhorred Him (ba'al means to loathe, reject). This mutual antagonism describes Jesus's relationship with Israel's leaders—He condemned them; they crucified Him.
"In one month" suggests swift, decisive action within a short time period. This could refer to Jesus's final confrontation with the religious leaders during His last Passover week, when He systematically exposed and condemned their hypocrisy (Matthew 21-23). Or it may point to the rapid collapse of Israel's leadership system after AD 70 when the temple, priesthood, and Sanhedrin all ended permanently.
"My soul lothed them, and their soul also abhorred me" (va-tiktzar nafshi bahem ve-gam nafsham ba'alah oti, וַתִּקְצַר נַפְשִׁי בָּהֶם וְגַם־נַפְשָׁם בָּעֲלָה אֹתִי) describes mutual rejection. The shepherd's soul grew impatient/weary with their wickedness (qatzar can mean shortened, impatient, disgusted). They in turn abhorred Him (ba'al means to loathe, reject). This mutual antagonism describes Jesus's relationship with Israel's leaders—He condemned them; they crucified Him.
Then said I, I will not feed you: that that dieth, let it die; and that that is to be cut off, let it be cut off; and let the rest eat every one the flesh of another. another: Heb. his fellow, or, neighbour
View commentary
Then said I, I will not feed you: that that dieth, let it die; and that that is to be cut off, let it be cut off; and let the rest eat every one the flesh of another. After cutting off the false shepherds, the Good Shepherd announces withdrawal from those who reject Him. "I will not feed you" (lo er'eh etkhem, לֹא אֶרְעֶה אֶתְכֶם) is judicial abandonment—ceasing to provide pastoral care. This recalls Jesus's words: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate" (Matthew 23:37-38).
"That that dieth, let it die" repeats for emphasis the consequences of rejecting the Shepherd's care. "That that is to be cut off, let it be cut off" speaks of being removed, destroyed—the same verb used in verse 8. Without the shepherd's protection, the flock faces death and destruction. This prophesies the horror of AD 70, when those who rejected Christ faced Rome's legions.
"Let the rest eat every one the flesh of another" (ve-ha-nish'arot tokalna ishah et-besar re'utah, וְהַנִּשְׁאֲרוֹת תֹּאכַלְנָה אִשָּׁה אֶת־בְּשַׂר רְעוּתָהּ) prophesies cannibalism—the ultimate horror of siege warfare. This fulfills Deuteronomy 28:53-57's covenant curses. Josephus records that during Jerusalem's siege, a woman named Mary actually killed and ate her own infant—a fulfillment so shocking it became infamous throughout the Roman world.
"That that dieth, let it die" repeats for emphasis the consequences of rejecting the Shepherd's care. "That that is to be cut off, let it be cut off" speaks of being removed, destroyed—the same verb used in verse 8. Without the shepherd's protection, the flock faces death and destruction. This prophesies the horror of AD 70, when those who rejected Christ faced Rome's legions.
"Let the rest eat every one the flesh of another" (ve-ha-nish'arot tokalna ishah et-besar re'utah, וְהַנִּשְׁאֲרוֹת תֹּאכַלְנָה אִשָּׁה אֶת־בְּשַׂר רְעוּתָהּ) prophesies cannibalism—the ultimate horror of siege warfare. This fulfills Deuteronomy 28:53-57's covenant curses. Josephus records that during Jerusalem's siege, a woman named Mary actually killed and ate her own infant—a fulfillment so shocking it became infamous throughout the Roman world.
And I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people.
View commentary
And I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people. The shepherd performs a symbolic act of breaking the staff called "Beauty" (No'am, נֹעַם), representing grace, favor, and covenant relationship. "Cut it asunder" (va-egda, וָאֶגְדַּע) means to cut down, hew, break—a decisive, violent action signifying the end of something precious.
The purpose is explicit: "that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people" (le-hafer et-beriti asher karati et-kol ha-ammim, לְהָפֵיר אֶת־בְּרִיתִי אֲשֶׁר כָּרַתִּי אֶת־כָּל־הָעַמִּים). The verb hafer means to annul, frustrate, break—ending a formal covenant relationship. The covenant "with all the people" likely refers to God's unique relationship with Israel among the nations, the covenant favor that set them apart. Alternatively, it may refer to God's restraint of the nations from destroying Israel—a covenant arrangement that kept pagan powers in check.
This breaking of the "Beauty" staff prophesies the end of the old covenant system. When Israel rejected their Messiah, the Mosaic covenant with its temple, priesthood, and sacrifices became obsolete. Hebrews 8:13 states: "In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away." The temple's destruction in AD 70 marked the visible end of the old covenant economy.
The purpose is explicit: "that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people" (le-hafer et-beriti asher karati et-kol ha-ammim, לְהָפֵיר אֶת־בְּרִיתִי אֲשֶׁר כָּרַתִּי אֶת־כָּל־הָעַמִּים). The verb hafer means to annul, frustrate, break—ending a formal covenant relationship. The covenant "with all the people" likely refers to God's unique relationship with Israel among the nations, the covenant favor that set them apart. Alternatively, it may refer to God's restraint of the nations from destroying Israel—a covenant arrangement that kept pagan powers in check.
This breaking of the "Beauty" staff prophesies the end of the old covenant system. When Israel rejected their Messiah, the Mosaic covenant with its temple, priesthood, and sacrifices became obsolete. Hebrews 8:13 states: "In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away." The temple's destruction in AD 70 marked the visible end of the old covenant economy.
And it was broken in that day: and so the poor of the flock that waited upon me knew that it was the word of the LORD. so: or, the poor of the flock, etc. certainly knew
View commentary
And it was broken in that day: and so the poor of the flock that waited upon me knew that it was the word of the LORD. This verse records the immediate fulfillment of the symbolic action and its recognition by the faithful remnant. "It was broken in that day" (va-tufer ba-yom ha-hu, וַתֻּפַר בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא) emphasizes the immediacy and certainty of the covenant-breaking. The passive voice indicates divine action—God Himself broke the covenant relationship.
"The poor of the flock that waited upon me" (aniyyei ha-tson ha-shomerim oti, עֲנִיֵּי הַצֹּאן הַשֹּׁמְרִים אֹתִי) identifies the remnant who recognized what was happening. The word shomer means watching, guarding, paying attention—these were observant believers who understood prophetic fulfillment. They are the same "poor of the flock" from verse 7—humble believers who received the shepherd's ministry and perceived its prophetic significance.
"Knew that it was the word of the LORD" (va-yed'u ken devar-YHWH hu, וַיֵּדְעוּ כֵן דְּבַר־יְהוָה הוּא) indicates spiritual discernment. While the masses rejected Christ and the religious elite plotted His death, the remnant—disciples, humble believers—recognized that events were unfolding according to God's prophetic word. They understood that the breaking of the staff, symbolizing the end of the old covenant, was divinely ordained.
This describes the believing remnant in Jesus's day who recognized Him as Messiah, understood that His rejection meant judgment on the nation, and perceived that a new covenant was being established. After Pentecost, these "poor of the flock" became the nucleus of the church.
"The poor of the flock that waited upon me" (aniyyei ha-tson ha-shomerim oti, עֲנִיֵּי הַצֹּאן הַשֹּׁמְרִים אֹתִי) identifies the remnant who recognized what was happening. The word shomer means watching, guarding, paying attention—these were observant believers who understood prophetic fulfillment. They are the same "poor of the flock" from verse 7—humble believers who received the shepherd's ministry and perceived its prophetic significance.
"Knew that it was the word of the LORD" (va-yed'u ken devar-YHWH hu, וַיֵּדְעוּ כֵן דְּבַר־יְהוָה הוּא) indicates spiritual discernment. While the masses rejected Christ and the religious elite plotted His death, the remnant—disciples, humble believers—recognized that events were unfolding according to God's prophetic word. They understood that the breaking of the staff, symbolizing the end of the old covenant, was divinely ordained.
This describes the believing remnant in Jesus's day who recognized Him as Messiah, understood that His rejection meant judgment on the nation, and perceived that a new covenant was being established. After Pentecost, these "poor of the flock" became the nucleus of the church.
And I said unto them, If ye think good, give me my price; and if not, forbear. So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver. If ye: Heb. If it be good in your eyes
View commentary
Prophetic symbol of Messiah's betrayal: 'And I said unto them, If ye think good, give me my price; and if not, forbear. So they weighed for my price thirty pieces of silver.' The shepherd-prophet asks for wages; they pay thirty shekels—Exodus 21:32's price for a slave killed by an ox. This insultingly low valuation of God's shepherd becomes prophecy of Judas betraying Jesus for thirty silver pieces (Matthew 26:15, 27:9-10). Verse 13's ironic command—'Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prised at of them'—was fulfilled when Judas threw the silver into the temple and priests bought potter's field (Matthew 27:5-7). This demonstrates Scripture's prophetic precision: specific details fulfilled centuries later. Israel's rejection and contemptuous undervaluing of God's Shepherd presaged rejecting Messiah.
And the LORD said unto me, Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prised at of them. And I took the thirty pieces of silver, and cast them to the potter in the house of the LORD.
View commentary
And the LORD said unto me, Cast it unto the potter: a goodly price that I was prised at of them. This verse drips with divine irony following the contemptuous payment of thirty silver pieces. The command "Cast it unto the potter" (hashlikhehu el-ha-yotser, הַשְׁלִיכֵהוּ אֶל־הַיּוֹצֵר) involves throwing the money contemptuously to the potter—either a craftsman working in the temple precincts or symbolizing worthlessness (clay vessels being common and cheap). God's sarcasm is biting: "a goodly price that I was prised at of them" (eder ha-yeqar asher yaqareti me'aleyhem)—"What a magnificent sum they valued me at!"
The thirty pieces of silver represents the price for a slave gored by an ox (Exodus 21:32), an insulting valuation for the Shepherd of Israel. Matthew 27:9-10 explicitly identifies this as prophecy fulfilled when Judas betrayed Jesus for thirty silver pieces, then threw the money into the temple. The priests used it to purchase the potter's field for burying strangers (Matthew 27:3-10). The prophetic precision is stunning: the specific amount, the rejection by religious leaders, the money cast into the temple, and the connection to a potter/field purchase—all fulfilled exactly.
This demonstrates how Israel corporately valued their covenant Lord—as worth only slave-price. The rejection prefigures the ultimate rejection when Jewish leaders delivered Jesus to crucifixion. Yet God's sovereignty operates even through betrayal: the very act of contempt becomes the mechanism of redemption. What humans intend for evil, God orchestrates for salvation (Genesis 50:20).
The thirty pieces of silver represents the price for a slave gored by an ox (Exodus 21:32), an insulting valuation for the Shepherd of Israel. Matthew 27:9-10 explicitly identifies this as prophecy fulfilled when Judas betrayed Jesus for thirty silver pieces, then threw the money into the temple. The priests used it to purchase the potter's field for burying strangers (Matthew 27:3-10). The prophetic precision is stunning: the specific amount, the rejection by religious leaders, the money cast into the temple, and the connection to a potter/field purchase—all fulfilled exactly.
This demonstrates how Israel corporately valued their covenant Lord—as worth only slave-price. The rejection prefigures the ultimate rejection when Jewish leaders delivered Jesus to crucifixion. Yet God's sovereignty operates even through betrayal: the very act of contempt becomes the mechanism of redemption. What humans intend for evil, God orchestrates for salvation (Genesis 50:20).
Then I cut asunder mine other staff, even Bands, that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel. Bands: or, Binders
View commentary
Then I cut asunder mine other staff, even Bands, that I might break the brotherhood between Judah and Israel. Following the rejection symbolized by the thirty pieces, Zechariah performs a second prophetic act. The breaking of "Bands" (Chovelim, חֹבְלִים, literally "binders" or "unifiers") symbolizes shattering the unity between Judah (Southern Kingdom) and Israel (Northern Kingdom). The verb "cut asunder" (gada'ti, גָּדַעְתִּי) means to hack off or chop down—violent, decisive severance.
The term "brotherhood" (ha-achavah, הָאַחֲוָה) refers to the covenantal kinship that should unite the twelve tribes. Historically, Israel divided after Solomon's death (931 BC)—ten northern tribes under Jeroboam (Israel/Ephraim) and two southern tribes under Rehoboam (Judah/Benjamin). Though both kingdoms returned from exile, full unity never materialized. The breaking of "Bands" prophetically signals permanent division as judgment for rejecting the Good Shepherd.
This fragmentation anticipates the scattering following Messiah's rejection. After AD 70, the Jewish people experienced diaspora lasting nearly two millennia. Yet Romans 11 reveals the mystery: spiritual unity comes not through ethnic Israel alone but through the one new man in Christ, where Jew and Gentile become one body (Ephesians 2:11-16). The brotherhood broken by rejection is restored through faith in the rejected Shepherd.
The term "brotherhood" (ha-achavah, הָאַחֲוָה) refers to the covenantal kinship that should unite the twelve tribes. Historically, Israel divided after Solomon's death (931 BC)—ten northern tribes under Jeroboam (Israel/Ephraim) and two southern tribes under Rehoboam (Judah/Benjamin). Though both kingdoms returned from exile, full unity never materialized. The breaking of "Bands" prophetically signals permanent division as judgment for rejecting the Good Shepherd.
This fragmentation anticipates the scattering following Messiah's rejection. After AD 70, the Jewish people experienced diaspora lasting nearly two millennia. Yet Romans 11 reveals the mystery: spiritual unity comes not through ethnic Israel alone but through the one new man in Christ, where Jew and Gentile become one body (Ephesians 2:11-16). The brotherhood broken by rejection is restored through faith in the rejected Shepherd.
And the LORD said unto me, Take unto thee yet the instruments of a foolish shepherd.
View commentary
And the LORD said unto me, Take unto thee yet the instruments of a foolish shepherd. After portraying the rejected Good Shepherd, Zechariah now must enact the role of "a foolish shepherd" (ro'eh ewili, רֹעֶה אֱוִלִי). The term ewili (אֱוִלִי, "foolish") doesn't mean lacking intelligence but morally perverse, wicked, and destructive—the opposite of wise and good. The "instruments" (keli, כְּלִי) are the tools of the shepherd's trade: staff, rod, scrip, and sling—but these will be wielded by a worthless leader.
This symbolic action introduces verses 16-17's description of the worthless shepherd who exploits rather than protects the flock. He fails to care for the perishing, seek the wandering, heal the broken, or feed the healthy—instead, he devours the sheep and tears them apart. This anti-shepherd represents wicked leadership God raises as judgment upon Israel for rejecting the Good Shepherd.
Interpretations identify this foolish shepherd variously: immediate application to corrupt leaders in Zechariah's era, typological fulfillment in figures like the false messiahs and corrupt priests of the inter-testament and first-century period, and eschatological fulfillment in the Antichrist who will deceive Israel during the tribulation (2 Thessalonians 2:3-12). Jesus warned that though they rejected Him who came in His Father's name, they would receive another coming in his own name (John 5:43)—the ultimate foolish shepherd.
This symbolic action introduces verses 16-17's description of the worthless shepherd who exploits rather than protects the flock. He fails to care for the perishing, seek the wandering, heal the broken, or feed the healthy—instead, he devours the sheep and tears them apart. This anti-shepherd represents wicked leadership God raises as judgment upon Israel for rejecting the Good Shepherd.
Interpretations identify this foolish shepherd variously: immediate application to corrupt leaders in Zechariah's era, typological fulfillment in figures like the false messiahs and corrupt priests of the inter-testament and first-century period, and eschatological fulfillment in the Antichrist who will deceive Israel during the tribulation (2 Thessalonians 2:3-12). Jesus warned that though they rejected Him who came in His Father's name, they would receive another coming in his own name (John 5:43)—the ultimate foolish shepherd.
For, lo, I will raise up a shepherd in the land, which shall not visit those that be cut off, neither shall seek the young one, nor heal that that is broken, nor feed that that standeth still: but he shall eat the flesh of the fat, and tear their claws in pieces. cut off: or, hidden feed: or, bear
View commentary
This prophetic oracle introduces a worthless shepherd as divine judgment on Israel. The phrase "lo, I will raise up" (hineh anokhi meqim) indicates God's sovereign action in bringing judgment through a wicked leader. The term "shepherd" (ro'eh) is loaded with meaning in Scripture, representing both political and spiritual leadership.
The shepherd's failures are systematically listed: he will "not visit those that be cut off" (et-hannikchad lo yiphqod)—failing to care for the perishing; "neither shall seek the young one" (hanna'ar lo-yevaqesh)—ignoring the wandering; "nor heal that that is broken" (vehanishshberet lo yerappe)—refusing to mend the injured; "nor feed that that standeth still" (hannitzzavah lo yekalkel)—neglecting even those standing ready to be fed.
Instead, this false shepherd will "eat the flesh of the fat" (besar haberiah yokhal)—consume the choice sheep—and "tear their claws in pieces" (parsehen yephareq), a graphic image of violent exploitation. This shepherd represents anti-pastoral leadership that consumes rather than nurtures.
The shepherd's failures are systematically listed: he will "not visit those that be cut off" (et-hannikchad lo yiphqod)—failing to care for the perishing; "neither shall seek the young one" (hanna'ar lo-yevaqesh)—ignoring the wandering; "nor heal that that is broken" (vehanishshberet lo yerappe)—refusing to mend the injured; "nor feed that that standeth still" (hannitzzavah lo yekalkel)—neglecting even those standing ready to be fed.
Instead, this false shepherd will "eat the flesh of the fat" (besar haberiah yokhal)—consume the choice sheep—and "tear their claws in pieces" (parsehen yephareq), a graphic image of violent exploitation. This shepherd represents anti-pastoral leadership that consumes rather than nurtures.
Woe to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock! the sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye: his arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened.
View commentary
Woe to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock! (הוֹי רֹעִי הָאֱלִיל עֹזְבִי הַצֹּאן)—hoy introduces covenant curse against the ro'i ha-elil (worthless/idol shepherd), one who azav (abandons, forsakes) sheep entrusted to him. This follows Zechariah's enacted prophecy where he symbolically became shepherd of a doomed flock (11:4-14), representing both failed Israelite leadership and, prophetically, the Messiah's rejection. The sword shall be upon his arm, and upon his right eye—specific judgment: the arm (strength for defense) and right eye (vision for guidance) will be destroyed, rendering the shepherd completely useless.
His arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened (זְרוֹעוֹ יָבוֹשׁ תִּיבָשׁ וְעֵין יְמִינוֹ כָּהֹה תִכְהֶה)—yavosh (wither, dry up) is atrophy from disuse or divine curse. Complete incapacitation: can't protect, can't guide. Many identify this 'worthless shepherd' as Antichrist, the final false shepherd whom Israel will initially accept (John 5:43: "If another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive") before recognizing the true Shepherd, Jesus.
His arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened (זְרוֹעוֹ יָבוֹשׁ תִּיבָשׁ וְעֵין יְמִינוֹ כָּהֹה תִכְהֶה)—yavosh (wither, dry up) is atrophy from disuse or divine curse. Complete incapacitation: can't protect, can't guide. Many identify this 'worthless shepherd' as Antichrist, the final false shepherd whom Israel will initially accept (John 5:43: "If another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive") before recognizing the true Shepherd, Jesus.