King James Version
Jeremiah 21
14 verses with commentary
Jerusalem's Doom
The word which came unto Jeremiah from the LORD, when king Zedekiah sent unto him Pashur the son of Melchiah, and Zephaniah the son of Maaseiah the priest, saying,
View commentary
When king Zedekiah sent unto him Pashur the son of Melchiah, and Zephaniah the son of Maaseiah the priest—this verse introduces a critical historical moment during Jerusalem's final siege (588-586 BC). King Zedekiah, Judah's last monarch, sends official delegates to inquire of Jeremiah. Note this is a different Pashur from the one who imprisoned Jeremiah (20:1-6). The delegation includes both a royal official and a priest, showing the gravity of the situation.
The timing is crucial: Nebuchadnezzar's army surrounds Jerusalem, and Zedekiah—having previously ignored and imprisoned Jeremiah—now desperately seeks divine intervention. This represents the tragic pattern of seeking God only in crisis while ignoring Him during prosperity. The Hebrew construction davar asher hayah (דָּבָר אֲשֶׁר־הָיָה, 'the word which came') uses the prophetic formula emphasizing that what follows is authentic divine revelation, not human counsel. This oracle would prove devastating: God would fight against Jerusalem (v. 5), overturning all hope for miraculous deliverance. The tragic irony is palpable—Zedekiah seeks God's intervention when he has spent years rejecting God's word through Jeremiah.
The timing is crucial: Nebuchadnezzar's army surrounds Jerusalem, and Zedekiah—having previously ignored and imprisoned Jeremiah—now desperately seeks divine intervention. This represents the tragic pattern of seeking God only in crisis while ignoring Him during prosperity. The Hebrew construction davar asher hayah (דָּבָר אֲשֶׁר־הָיָה, 'the word which came') uses the prophetic formula emphasizing that what follows is authentic divine revelation, not human counsel. This oracle would prove devastating: God would fight against Jerusalem (v. 5), overturning all hope for miraculous deliverance. The tragic irony is palpable—Zedekiah seeks God's intervention when he has spent years rejecting God's word through Jeremiah.
Enquire, I pray thee, of the LORD for us; for Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon maketh war against us; if so be that the LORD will deal with us according to all his wondrous works, that he may go up from us.
View commentary
Enquire, I pray thee, of the LORD for us—Zedekiah's request uses darash (דָּרַשׁ, to seek, inquire, consult), the technical term for seeking prophetic revelation. For Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon maketh war against us—the spelling 'Nebuchadrezzar' (instead of Nebuchadnezzar) reflects the Babylonian pronunciation Nabu-kudurri-usur. The present tense 'maketh war' conveys the active, ongoing siege with armies at the gates.
If so be that the LORD will deal with us according to all his wondrous works, that he may go up from us—here lies Zedekiah's fatal misunderstanding. He hopes for niphla'otayv (נִפְלְאֹתָיו, wonderful/miraculous works) like God performed for previous generations: the Exodus plagues, Jericho's walls, Sennacherib's defeat. The phrase 'that he may go up from us' (ya'aleh me'alenu, יַעֲלֶה מֵעָלֵינוּ) means 'that he [Nebuchadnezzar] may withdraw from us.' Zedekiah wants deliverance without repentance, miraculous intervention without covenant faithfulness. He treats God like a tribal deity obligated to defend His people regardless of their behavior. This presumption ignores decades of prophetic warning. God's 'wondrous works' in the past came when His people trusted Him; now Jerusalem faces judgment for persistent rebellion. The irony is devastating: the coming 'wonder' would be God fighting for Babylon against His own people (v. 5).
If so be that the LORD will deal with us according to all his wondrous works, that he may go up from us—here lies Zedekiah's fatal misunderstanding. He hopes for niphla'otayv (נִפְלְאֹתָיו, wonderful/miraculous works) like God performed for previous generations: the Exodus plagues, Jericho's walls, Sennacherib's defeat. The phrase 'that he may go up from us' (ya'aleh me'alenu, יַעֲלֶה מֵעָלֵינוּ) means 'that he [Nebuchadnezzar] may withdraw from us.' Zedekiah wants deliverance without repentance, miraculous intervention without covenant faithfulness. He treats God like a tribal deity obligated to defend His people regardless of their behavior. This presumption ignores decades of prophetic warning. God's 'wondrous works' in the past came when His people trusted Him; now Jerusalem faces judgment for persistent rebellion. The irony is devastating: the coming 'wonder' would be God fighting for Babylon against His own people (v. 5).
Then said Jeremiah unto them, Thus shall ye say to Zedekiah:
View commentary
Then said Jeremiah unto them, Thus shall ye say to Zedekiah—this brief verse serves as a transition from the king's desperate plea to God's devastating answer. The formula 'Thus shall ye say' (koh tomrun, כֹּה־תֹאמְרוּן) introduces prophetic pronouncement, authorizing the messengers to speak God's word to the king. Jeremiah functions here as mediator between God and king, but unlike Moses who interceded for Israel, Jeremiah would deliver only judgment.
The brevity creates dramatic tension—what will God's answer be? Will He repeat past miracles? The reader who knows Zedekiah's history (his oath-breaking, imprisonment of Jeremiah, rejection of God's word) anticipates the answer will not be what the king hopes. This verse exemplifies Jeremiah's faithfulness: despite persecution by Judah's leadership, when the king seeks God's word, Jeremiah speaks it truthfully. He doesn't soften the message or seek revenge. This demonstrates the prophet's calling: to speak God's word regardless of personal consequence or the audience's receptivity. Jesus similarly spoke truth even when it cost Him everything (John 18:37).
The brevity creates dramatic tension—what will God's answer be? Will He repeat past miracles? The reader who knows Zedekiah's history (his oath-breaking, imprisonment of Jeremiah, rejection of God's word) anticipates the answer will not be what the king hopes. This verse exemplifies Jeremiah's faithfulness: despite persecution by Judah's leadership, when the king seeks God's word, Jeremiah speaks it truthfully. He doesn't soften the message or seek revenge. This demonstrates the prophet's calling: to speak God's word regardless of personal consequence or the audience's receptivity. Jesus similarly spoke truth even when it cost Him everything (John 18:37).
Thus saith the LORD God of Israel; Behold, I will turn back the weapons of war that are in your hands, wherewith ye fight against the king of Babylon, and against the Chaldeans, which besiege you without the walls, and I will assemble them into the midst of this city.
View commentary
Thus saith the LORD God of Israel; Behold, I will turn back the weapons of war that are in your hands—God's answer begins with the covenant formula identifying Yahweh as 'the LORD God of Israel,' emphasizing His covenant relationship even as He pronounces judgment. The phrase hineni mesev (הִנְנִי מֵסֵב, 'Behold, I will turn back') uses savav (סָבַב), meaning to turn around, reverse direction, or cause to return. God declares He will make Jerusalem's weapons turn against them—their own military equipment will become useless or counterproductive.
Wherewith ye fight against the king of Babylon, and against the Chaldeans, which besiege you without the walls—the description 'without the walls' (michutz lechomah, מִחוּץ לְחוֹמָה) indicates Babylon's army surrounds Jerusalem completely. And I will assemble them into the midst of this city—asaphti otam (אָסַפְתִּי אֹתָם, 'I will gather them') reveals God's active role: He will drive Jerusalem's defenders back from the walls, collapsing their defensive perimeter until the enemy occupies Jerusalem's heart. This reverses holy war theology where God fought for Israel. Now God fights against His own city, making defense impossible. This fulfills covenant curses of Leviticus 26:17, 25: 'I will set my face against you... I will bring a sword upon you.' The tragedy is complete: Israel's covenant God becomes their enemy because they broke covenant.
Wherewith ye fight against the king of Babylon, and against the Chaldeans, which besiege you without the walls—the description 'without the walls' (michutz lechomah, מִחוּץ לְחוֹמָה) indicates Babylon's army surrounds Jerusalem completely. And I will assemble them into the midst of this city—asaphti otam (אָסַפְתִּי אֹתָם, 'I will gather them') reveals God's active role: He will drive Jerusalem's defenders back from the walls, collapsing their defensive perimeter until the enemy occupies Jerusalem's heart. This reverses holy war theology where God fought for Israel. Now God fights against His own city, making defense impossible. This fulfills covenant curses of Leviticus 26:17, 25: 'I will set my face against you... I will bring a sword upon you.' The tragedy is complete: Israel's covenant God becomes their enemy because they broke covenant.
And I myself will fight against you with an outstretched hand and with a strong arm, even in anger, and in fury, and in great wrath.
View commentary
God declares He will personally fight against Jerusalem with 'an outstretched hand and with a strong arm' - language typically describing His deliverance of Israel from Egypt (Deut 4:34). Now those same redemptive hands work in judgment. God's 'anger, and fury, and great wrath' emphasize the intensity of deserved judgment when His people persistently reject Him.
And I will smite the inhabitants of this city, both man and beast: they shall die of a great pestilence.
View commentary
And I will smite the inhabitants of this city, both man and beast: they shall die of a great pestilence—God declares He will personally strike (hikketi, הִכֵּיתִי, from nakah, נָכָה) Jerusalem's population. The comprehensive nature ('both man and beast,' me'adam ve'ad behemah, מֵאָדָם וְעַד־בְּהֵמָה) echoes the plague language of Exodus, but now directed at God's own people rather than Egypt. They shall die of a great pestilence (dever gadol, דֶּבֶר גָּדוֹל, great plague/pestilence) refers to epidemic disease, one of three judgment forms consistently prophesied: sword, famine, and pestilence (Jeremiah 14:12, 21:9, 24:10).
The inclusion of animals emphasizes total devastation—not merely human casualties but ecological collapse. This fulfills covenant curses of Leviticus 26:22, Deuteronomy 28:21. The 'great pestilence' resulted from siege conditions: starvation, contaminated water, disease from unburied corpses, and lack of sanitation in the crowded, besieged city. Lamentations 4:9-10 describes the horror: 'Better are those slain with the sword than those slain with hunger... compassionate women have boiled their own children.' The tragedy is that this suffering was preventable—God had offered terms of survival through surrender (Jeremiah 21:8-9), but Judah's leaders rejected God's word. The judgment shows that rebellion against God brings death and destruction, while repentance and obedience bring life (Deuteronomy 30:15-20).
The inclusion of animals emphasizes total devastation—not merely human casualties but ecological collapse. This fulfills covenant curses of Leviticus 26:22, Deuteronomy 28:21. The 'great pestilence' resulted from siege conditions: starvation, contaminated water, disease from unburied corpses, and lack of sanitation in the crowded, besieged city. Lamentations 4:9-10 describes the horror: 'Better are those slain with the sword than those slain with hunger... compassionate women have boiled their own children.' The tragedy is that this suffering was preventable—God had offered terms of survival through surrender (Jeremiah 21:8-9), but Judah's leaders rejected God's word. The judgment shows that rebellion against God brings death and destruction, while repentance and obedience bring life (Deuteronomy 30:15-20).
And afterward, saith the LORD, I will deliver Zedekiah king of Judah, and his servants, and the people, and such as are left in this city from the pestilence, from the sword, and from the famine, into the hand of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, and into the hand of their enemies, and into the hand of those that seek their life: and he shall smite them with the edge of the sword; he shall not spare them, neither have pity, nor have mercy.
View commentary
And afterward, saith the LORD, I will deliver Zedekiah king of Judah, and his servants, and the people, and such as are left in this city from the pestilence, from the sword, and from the famine—the phrase 'and afterward' (ve'acharei-chen, וְאַחֲרֵי־כֵן) indicates sequential judgment: first pestilence will devastate the population (v. 6), then survivors will face captivity. Those who survive the siege's horrors—sword, famine, pestilence—face an even more specific fate. Into the hand of Nebuchadrezzar king of Babylon, and into the hand of their enemies, and into the hand of those that seek their life—the triple repetition 'into the hand' (beyad, בְּיַד) emphasizes complete subjugation with no escape. The phrase 'those that seek their life' (mevakshei naphsham, מְבַקְשֵׁי נַפְשָׁם) indicates active pursuit to kill, not merely imprison.
And he shall smite them with the edge of the sword; he shall not spare them, neither have pity, nor have mercy—the Hebrew piles up negatives: lo yachmol (לֹא־יַחְמֹל, no sparing), velo yachus (וְלֹא־יָחוֹס, no pity), velo yerachem (וְלֹא יְרַחֵם, no mercy). Three terms for compassion are systematically denied. This reverses God's self-description as compassionate and merciful (Exodus 34:6-7) by declaring His chosen instrument—pagan Nebuchadnezzar—will show none. This was precisely fulfilled: Zedekiah witnessed his sons' execution before his eyes were gouged out, then was taken in chains to Babylon (2 Kings 25:6-7). Judah's leadership who rejected mercy from God received no mercy from Babylon.
And he shall smite them with the edge of the sword; he shall not spare them, neither have pity, nor have mercy—the Hebrew piles up negatives: lo yachmol (לֹא־יַחְמֹל, no sparing), velo yachus (וְלֹא־יָחוֹס, no pity), velo yerachem (וְלֹא יְרַחֵם, no mercy). Three terms for compassion are systematically denied. This reverses God's self-description as compassionate and merciful (Exodus 34:6-7) by declaring His chosen instrument—pagan Nebuchadnezzar—will show none. This was precisely fulfilled: Zedekiah witnessed his sons' execution before his eyes were gouged out, then was taken in chains to Babylon (2 Kings 25:6-7). Judah's leadership who rejected mercy from God received no mercy from Babylon.
And unto this people thou shalt say, Thus saith the LORD; Behold, I set before you the way of life, and the way of death.
View commentary
The 'way of life' and 'way of death' recalls Moses' final sermon (Deut 30:15-19). God's covenant faithfulness includes both blessing and curse; here Jeremiah presents a stark choice - surrender to Babylon (life) or resist (death). This counter-intuitive counsel tested whether Judah trusted God's word over nationalistic pride. Christ later uses similar language about narrow and wide ways (Matt 7:13-14).
He that abideth in this city shall die by the sword, and by the famine, and by the pestilence: but he that goeth out, and falleth to the Chaldeans that besiege you, he shall live , and his life shall be unto him for a prey.
View commentary
God offers the besieged inhabitants of Jerusalem a stark choice: 'He that abideth in this city shall die by the sword, and by the famine, and by the pestilence: but he that goeth out, and falleth to the Chaldeans...shall live.' This counsel was deeply controversial, viewed as treason by Jerusalem's leaders. Surrender to Babylon seemed like abandoning God's promises to defend Jerusalem. Yet Jeremiah insists God is actually fighting against Jerusalem (v. 5), making resistance futile and surrender the path to life.
This teaching overturns conventional wisdom that equates faith with fighting to the last man. Sometimes faith means accepting God's discipline and submitting to His ordained instrument of judgment. The way to preserve life was paradoxically to 'fall to' the enemy. Jesus later taught similar paradox: 'Whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it' (Matthew 16:25). True wisdom discerns what God is doing and aligns with His purposes rather than resisting them.
The phrase 'his life shall be unto him for a prey' means he will escape with his life as one escapes a battle with plunder—barely, but successfully. This was fulfilled: those who followed Jeremiah's counsel (including Daniel and other exiles) survived and eventually prospered in Babylon. Those who resisted faced death during Jerusalem's fall. Knowing when to fight and when to submit to God's discipline requires spiritual discernment that comes only through knowing God's word.
This teaching overturns conventional wisdom that equates faith with fighting to the last man. Sometimes faith means accepting God's discipline and submitting to His ordained instrument of judgment. The way to preserve life was paradoxically to 'fall to' the enemy. Jesus later taught similar paradox: 'Whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it' (Matthew 16:25). True wisdom discerns what God is doing and aligns with His purposes rather than resisting them.
The phrase 'his life shall be unto him for a prey' means he will escape with his life as one escapes a battle with plunder—barely, but successfully. This was fulfilled: those who followed Jeremiah's counsel (including Daniel and other exiles) survived and eventually prospered in Babylon. Those who resisted faced death during Jerusalem's fall. Knowing when to fight and when to submit to God's discipline requires spiritual discernment that comes only through knowing God's word.
For I have set my face against this city for evil, and not for good, saith the LORD: it shall be given into the hand of the king of Babylon, and he shall burn it with fire.
View commentary
God declares He has 'set my face against this city for evil, and not for good.' The phrase 'set my face' indicates determined purpose - God's active opposition rather than passive withdrawal. This city will be given into Babylon's hand to be burned with fire. When God's patience exhausts, His opposition to sin becomes active judgment. There is no neutrality with God - blessing or curse, life or death (Deut 30:19).
And touching the house of the king of Judah, say, Hear ye the word of the LORD;
View commentary
And touching the house of the king of Judah, say, Hear ye the word of the LORD—this verse introduces a distinct oracle directed at the royal house ('house of the king of Judah,' beyt melech yehudah, בֵּית מֶלֶךְ־יְהוּדָה). The phrase 'touching' (le-, לְ) means 'concerning' or 'regarding.' The imperative 'Hear ye' (shim'u, שִׁמְעוּ) is the covenantal call to obedience found throughout Scripture (Deuteronomy 6:4, 'Hear, O Israel'). 'The word of the LORD' (devar-YHWH, דְּבַר־יְהוָה) emphasizes divine authority—what follows is not Jeremiah's opinion but God's revealed will.
This transitional verse marks a shift from addressing Zedekiah's specific inquiry (vv. 1-10) to general prophetic instruction to the Davidic dynasty. The royal house bore special responsibility because God's covenant with David (2 Samuel 7:12-16) promised an eternal throne conditioned on obedience (1 Kings 9:4-7). Jeremiah's ministry consistently called the royal house to 'execute judgment and righteousness' (Jeremiah 22:3) as the primary duty of Davidic kings. The tragedy was that Judah's kings failed this calling, exploiting the poor and shedding innocent blood (Jeremiah 22:17). This passage shows that royal authority derives from divine mandate, not inherent right—kings must submit to God's word or face judgment. Ultimately, only King Jesus perfectly fulfills the Davidic covenant, ruling with perfect justice (Isaiah 9:7, Luke 1:32-33).
This transitional verse marks a shift from addressing Zedekiah's specific inquiry (vv. 1-10) to general prophetic instruction to the Davidic dynasty. The royal house bore special responsibility because God's covenant with David (2 Samuel 7:12-16) promised an eternal throne conditioned on obedience (1 Kings 9:4-7). Jeremiah's ministry consistently called the royal house to 'execute judgment and righteousness' (Jeremiah 22:3) as the primary duty of Davidic kings. The tragedy was that Judah's kings failed this calling, exploiting the poor and shedding innocent blood (Jeremiah 22:17). This passage shows that royal authority derives from divine mandate, not inherent right—kings must submit to God's word or face judgment. Ultimately, only King Jesus perfectly fulfills the Davidic covenant, ruling with perfect justice (Isaiah 9:7, Luke 1:32-33).
O house of David, thus saith the LORD; Execute judgment in the morning, and deliver him that is spoiled out of the hand of the oppressor, lest my fury go out like fire, and burn that none can quench it, because of the evil of your doings. Execute: Heb. Judge
View commentary
The 'morning by morning' repetition emphasizes the daily, consistent requirement for justice - not sporadic reforms but sustained righteousness. The Hebrew 'mishpat' (judgment) encompasses both legal justice and covenant faithfulness. Kings were God's vice-regents, accountable to execute His justice. Their failure brought 'the fire of mine wrath' - God's holy opposition to injustice cannot be appeased by religious ritual alone (Isa 1:11-17).
Behold, I am against thee, O inhabitant of the valley, and rock of the plain, saith the LORD; which say, Who shall come down against us? or who shall enter into our habitations? inhabitant: Heb. inhabitress
View commentary
Behold, I am against thee, O inhabitant of the valley, and rock of the plain, saith the LORD—God declares Himself Jerusalem's enemy using the confrontational formula hineni elayikh (הִנְנִי אֵלַיִךְ, 'Behold, I am against you'). This phrase appears repeatedly in prophetic literature announcing divine judgment (Jeremiah 50:31, 51:25, Ezekiel 5:8). The address 'O inhabitant of the valley, and rock of the plain' (yoshevet ha'emeq tsur hamishor, יֹשֶׁבֶת הָעֵמֶק צוּר הַמִּישֹׁר) describes Jerusalem's geography: built on rocky elevation surrounded by valleys (Kidron, Hinnom, Tyropoeon), creating natural defensive advantages.
Which say, Who shall come down against us? or who shall enter into our habitations?—this captures Jerusalem's false confidence (mi yered alenu, מִי־יֵרֵד עָלֵינוּ, 'Who can descend upon us?'). The rhetorical questions express presumptuous security based on geography and theology—they believed their fortifications and God's presence in the temple made them invincible. This echoes the false security Jeremiah condemned: 'The temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD' (Jeremiah 7:4). But God's declaration 'I am against you' overturns all human security. No fortress, geographic advantage, or religious heritage protects those who rebel against God. This fulfills Leviticus 26:19: 'I will break the pride of your power.' True security comes not from walls or location but from covenant faithfulness (Psalm 127:1).
Which say, Who shall come down against us? or who shall enter into our habitations?—this captures Jerusalem's false confidence (mi yered alenu, מִי־יֵרֵד עָלֵינוּ, 'Who can descend upon us?'). The rhetorical questions express presumptuous security based on geography and theology—they believed their fortifications and God's presence in the temple made them invincible. This echoes the false security Jeremiah condemned: 'The temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD, the temple of the LORD' (Jeremiah 7:4). But God's declaration 'I am against you' overturns all human security. No fortress, geographic advantage, or religious heritage protects those who rebel against God. This fulfills Leviticus 26:19: 'I will break the pride of your power.' True security comes not from walls or location but from covenant faithfulness (Psalm 127:1).
But I will punish you according to the fruit of your doings, saith the LORD: and I will kindle a fire in the forest thereof, and it shall devour all things round about it. punish: Heb. visit upon
View commentary
God will kindle fire in Jerusalem's 'forest' (likely referring to Solomon's 'house of the forest of Lebanon' - 1 Kings 7:2) that will 'devour all things round about it.' Fire frequently symbolizes God's judgment (Deut 32:22). This comprehensive destruction spares nothing - a complete purging of sin's effects. The warning fulfills Moses' prophecy of covenant curses.