King James Version

What Does Ezra 10:42 Mean?

Ezra 10:42 in the King James Version says “Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph. — study this verse from Ezra chapter 10 with commentary, cross-references, and original Hebrew word analysis.

Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph.

Ezra 10:42 · KJV


Context

40

Machnadebai, Shashai, Sharai, Machnadebai: or, Mabnadebai, according to some copies

41

Azareel, and Shelemiah, Shemariah,

42

Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph.

43

Of the sons of Nebo; Jeiel, Mattithiah, Zabad, Zebina, Jadau, and Joel, Benaiah.

44

All these had taken strange wives: and some of them had wives by whom they had children.


Commentary

KJV Study Commentary
Shallum, Amariah, and Joseph—שַׁלּוּם (Shallum, 'the rewarded one' or 'peaceful'), אֲמַרְיָה (Amaryah, 'Yahweh has said/promised'), יוֹסֵף (Yosef, 'he will add'—the patriarch Joseph's name). The continuation of the list maintains the pattern: brief enumeration without editorial comment, allowing the names themselves to testify. Joseph is particularly poignant—bearing the name of Israel's deliverer who remained faithful in pagan Egypt (Genesis 39:9: 'How then can I do this great wickedness and sin against God?'), yet this Joseph compromised through forbidden marriage.

The brevity of verses 41-43 (just listing names) reflects the list's function as legal record rather than narrative. Yet each name represents a family crisis: a man divorcing his wife and sending away children born to her (v. 44). Modern readers struggle with this seemingly harsh measure, but the text insists it was necessary to preserve Israel's theological identity as Yahweh's holy people, set apart from the nations (Leviticus 20:26). The alternative—assimilation through intermarriage—would erase Israel's distinct witness and nullify God's covenant purposes.

KJV Study — Public Domain

Historical & Cultural Context

The dismissal of foreign wives and their children (10:3, 10:44) appears harsh by modern standards but addressed existential threat to post-exilic Israel's survival. The community was small (perhaps 50,000 total), economically struggling, and surrounded by hostile neighbors. Mixed marriages threatened to replay the pre-exilic apostasy that provoked Babylonian judgment—Solomon's foreign wives turned his heart to idols (1 Kings 11:1-8), and widespread intermarriage contributed to Israel's covenant unfaithfulness (Malachi 2:11-12). The covenant renewal, though traumatic, was necessary amputation to prevent gangrene from destroying the body.

Reflection Questions

  1. How should modern readers understand OT covenant purity laws without either dismissing them as irrelevant or misapplying them to the church?
  2. What does the tragic irony of 'Joseph' (named for a model of faithfulness) compromising teach about presuming on spiritual heritage?
  3. In what ways does the church face similar tensions between cultural engagement and maintaining distinct theological identity?

Original Language Analysis

Hebrew · 3 words
שַׁלּ֥וּם1 of 3

Shallum

H7967

shallum, the name of fourteen israelites

אֲמַרְיָ֖ה2 of 3

Amariah

H568

amarjah, the name of nine israelites

יוֹסֵֽף׃3 of 3

and Joseph

H3130

joseph, the name of seven israelites


Study Guide

Historical Context

This verse is found in the book of Ezra. Understanding the historical and cultural background helps illuminate its meaning for the original audience and for us today.

Theological Significance

Ezra 10:42 contributes to our understanding of God's character and His relationship with humanity. Consider how this verse connects to the broader themes of Scripture.

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study