King James Version

What Does Ezra 10:37 Mean?

Ezra 10:37 in the King James Version says “Mattaniah, Mattenai, and Jaasau, — study this verse from Ezra chapter 10 with commentary, cross-references, and original Hebrew word analysis.

Mattaniah, Mattenai, and Jaasau,

Ezra 10:37 · KJV


Context

35

Benaiah, Bedeiah, Chelluh,

36

Vaniah, Meremoth, Eliashib,

37

Mattaniah, Mattenai, and Jaasau,

38

And Bani, and Binnui, Shimei,

39

And Shelemiah, and Nathan, and Adaiah,


Commentary

KJV Study Commentary
Mattaniah, Mattenai, and Jaasau. This trio of names continues the register of covenant violators. Mattaniah and Mattenai both derive from mattān (מַתָּן, 'gift'), meaning 'gift of Yahweh.' The repetition of similar names suggests possibly related family members—perhaps brothers or cousins—who fell into the same sin together. Jaasau (also spelled Jaasu) means 'Yahweh has made,' another theophoric name proclaiming divine action.

The clustering of similar names highlights family and peer influence in sin. When covenant compromise spreads through kinship networks, it demonstrates how spiritual failure rarely remains individual. The public recording of these names served as permanent warning against following family into disobedience rather than leading them toward faithfulness.

Theologically, this teaches that covenant identity signified by names doesn't automatically produce covenant obedience. Being 'gift of Yahweh' by name requires corresponding life reflecting that identity. The tragedy is that those whose names proclaimed God's goodness betrayed that calling through forbidden marriages.

KJV Study — Public Domain

Historical & Cultural Context

These names appear in the section listing violators from the 'sons of Nebo' (Ezra 10:43), referring to a specific family clan within the returned community. Nebo was a Babylonian deity, which may indicate this family had deeper syncretistic tendencies, making them more susceptible to intermarriage with pagans.

The theophoric element in these names ('Yah' or 'Yahweh') shows these families maintained Jewish religious identity through exile. They named children after the covenant God even while living in Babylon. Yet naming practices alone didn't prevent later spiritual compromise.

The resolution required these men to divorce their foreign wives and send away children (Ezra 10:44). Archaeological evidence from Elephantine (Jewish colony in Egypt, 5th century BC) shows mixed marriages were common among diaspora Jews, making Ezra's strict enforcement controversial but necessary for preserving distinct covenant community.

Reflection Questions

  1. How does family influence either strengthen or undermine spiritual faithfulness?
  2. What does the gap between theological names and practical disobedience teach about nominal versus genuine faith?
  3. How can Christian communities address systemic patterns of sin without scapegoating individuals?

Original Language Analysis

Hebrew · 3 words
מַתַּנְיָ֥ה1 of 3

Mattaniah

H4983

mattanjah, the name of ten israelites

מַתְּנַ֖י2 of 3

Mattenai

H4982

mattenai, the name of three israelites

וְיַעֲשָֽׂו׃3 of 3

and Jaasau

H3299

jaasu, an israelite


Study Guide

Historical Context

This verse is found in the book of Ezra. Understanding the historical and cultural background helps illuminate its meaning for the original audience and for us today.

Theological Significance

Ezra 10:37 contributes to our understanding of God's character and His relationship with humanity. Consider how this verse connects to the broader themes of Scripture.

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study