King James Version

What Does Deuteronomy 23:25 Mean?

Deuteronomy 23:25 in the King James Version says “When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbour, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand; but thou shal... — study this verse from Deuteronomy chapter 23 with commentary, cross-references, and original Hebrew word analysis.

When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbour, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand; but thou shalt not move a sickle unto thy neighbour's standing corn.

Deuteronomy 23:25 · KJV


Context

23

That which is gone out of thy lips thou shalt keep and perform; even a freewill offering, according as thou hast vowed unto the LORD thy God, which thou hast promised with thy mouth.

24

When thou comest into thy neighbour's vineyard, then thou mayest eat grapes thy fill at thine own pleasure; but thou shalt not put any in thy vessel.

25

When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbour, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand; but thou shalt not move a sickle unto thy neighbour's standing corn.


Commentary

KJV Study Commentary
When thou comest into the standing corn of thy neighbour, then thou mayest pluck the ears with thine hand; but thou shalt not move a sickle unto thy neighbour's standing corn.

This verse parallels the preceding regulation about vineyards (v. 24), applying the same principle to grain fields. The permission to 'pluck ears with thine hand' (qatafta melilot beyadekha) allowed hand-picking individual heads of grain to satisfy immediate hunger. However, using a chermesh (חֶרְמֵשׁ, 'sickle'), the harvesting tool, was prohibited. Hand-plucking gathered small amounts for immediate consumption; sickle use indicated harvesting for storage or sale—theft rather than hospitality.

This distinction protected both travelers and landowners. Hungry travelers could satisfy immediate needs without begging or stealing, maintaining dignity while receiving sustenance. Landowners practiced generosity without losing their harvest to systematic exploitation. The limitation to hand-gathering ensured minimal impact on crops while meeting genuine needs. This created sustainable charity: generous enough to feed travelers, restricted enough to preserve owners' livelihood and prevent abuse.

The disciples' action in Matthew 12:1 and Luke 6:1 invoked this very law. Pharisaic criticism focused not on taking grain (legally permitted) but on Sabbath work. Jesus's defense demonstrated that: (1) human need takes precedence over ceremonial restriction; (2) disciples weren't breaking God's law, only Pharisaic tradition; (3) mercy and compassion characterize kingdom ethics more than strict rule-following. This incident illustrates how God's generous provisions for human welfare can be obscured by legalistic tradition that multiplies restrictions. True biblical ethics balance law's letter with its merciful intent, prioritizing human welfare while maintaining proper respect for God's commands and neighbors' rights.

KJV Study — Public Domain

Historical & Cultural Context

Grain cultivation dominated ancient Near Eastern agriculture, making this law highly relevant to daily life. Wheat, barley, and other grains provided staple foods, and harvest time was crucial for annual survival. Fields typically weren't fenced, allowing travelers to walk through standing crops. This accessibility made the law necessary: without regulation, fields could be stripped by passing travelers, devastating farmers who depended on harvest for livelihood and seed for next year's planting.

Archaeological evidence from ancient Israel shows agricultural implements including sickles made of flint, bronze, or iron attached to wooden handles. These tools enabled efficient harvesting that could quickly denude fields. The law's prohibition on sickle use prevented travelers from engaging in actual harvesting, limiting them to inefficient hand-plucking that gathered only small amounts. This practical distinction enabled enforcement: someone using a sickle in another's field was clearly stealing, not merely satisfying hunger.

The practice continued into Second Temple Judaism, with rabbinic discussions elaborating on details: how much could be taken, whether groups could gather together, whether one could inform others about particularly generous fields. While some elaborations became overly detailed, they demonstrated ongoing commitment to the underlying principle: community obligation to feed hungry travelers balanced with protecting farmers' livelihoods. Jesus's citation of this law showed it remained operative and culturally understood in first-century Palestine, serving as common ground for discussing Sabbath observance and demonstrating that God's law makes provision for human needs within appropriate boundaries that respect both individual welfare and community sustainability.

Reflection Questions

  1. How does this law's balance between generosity and property rights inform Christian economic ethics?
  2. What does the limitation to hand-gathering teach about meeting needs sustainably without enabling exploitation?
  3. How should churches navigate the tension between generous assistance to the needy and preventing systemic abuse of charity?

Original Language Analysis

Hebrew · 13 words
כִּ֤י1 of 13
H3588

(by implication) very widely used as a relative conjunction or adverb (as below); often largely modified by other particles annexed

תָבֹא֙2 of 13

When thou comest

H935

to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)

קָמַ֥ת3 of 13

into the standing corn

H7054

something that rises, i.e., a stalk of grain

רֵעֶֽךָ׃4 of 13

of thy neighbour

H7453

an associate (more or less close)

וְקָֽטַפְתָּ֥5 of 13

then thou mayest pluck

H6998

to strip off

מְלִילֹ֖ת6 of 13

the ears

H4425

a head of grain (as cut off)

בְּיָדֶ֑ךָ7 of 13

with thine hand

H3027

a hand (the open one [indicating power, means, direction, etc.], in distinction from h3709, the closed one); used (as noun, adverb, etc.) in a great v

וְחֶרְמֵשׁ֙8 of 13

a sickle

H2770

a sickle (as cutting)

לֹ֣א9 of 13
H3808

not (the simple or abs. negation); by implication, no; often used with other particles

תָנִ֔יף10 of 13

but thou shalt not move

H5130

to quiver (i.e., vibrate up and down, or rock to and fro); used in a great variety of applications (including sprinkling, beckoning, rubbing, bastinad

עַ֖ל11 of 13
H5921

above, over, upon, or against (yet always in this last relation with a downward aspect) in a great variety of applications

קָמַ֥ת12 of 13

into the standing corn

H7054

something that rises, i.e., a stalk of grain

רֵעֶֽךָ׃13 of 13

of thy neighbour

H7453

an associate (more or less close)


Study Guide

Historical Context

This verse is found in the book of Deuteronomy. Understanding the historical and cultural background helps illuminate its meaning for the original audience and for us today.

Theological Significance

Deuteronomy 23:25 contributes to our understanding of God's character and His relationship with humanity. Consider how this verse connects to the broader themes of Scripture.

Cross-References

Verses related to Deuteronomy 23:25 from Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study