King James Version

What Does Daniel 8:6 Mean?

Daniel 8:6 in the King James Version says “And he came to the ram that had two horns, which I had seen standing before the river, and ran unto him in the fury of h... — study this verse from Daniel chapter 8 with commentary, cross-references, and original Hebrew word analysis.

And he came to the ram that had two horns, which I had seen standing before the river, and ran unto him in the fury of his power.

Daniel 8:6 · KJV


Context

4

I saw the ram pushing westward, and northward, and southward; so that no beasts might stand before him, neither was there any that could deliver out of his hand; but he did according to his will, and became great.

5

And as I was considering, behold, an he goat came from the west on the face of the whole earth, and touched not the ground: and the goat had a notable horn between his eyes. touched: or, none touched him in the earth a notable: Heb. a horn of sight

6

And he came to the ram that had two horns, which I had seen standing before the river, and ran unto him in the fury of his power.

7

And I saw him come close unto the ram, and he was moved with choler against him, and smote the ram, and brake his two horns: and there was no power in the ram to stand before him, but he cast him down to the ground, and stamped upon him: and there was none that could deliver the ram out of his hand.

8

Therefore the he goat waxed very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and for it came up four notable ones toward the four winds of heaven.


Commentary

KJV Study Commentary
The confrontation between ram and goat represents the military clash between Persia and Greece. The phrase "he came to the ram that had two horns" describes Alexander's direct assault on Medo-Persian power. "In the fury of his power" (Hebrew: bachamat kocho, בַּחֲמַת כֹּחוֹ) depicts the rage and ferocity of Greek military might unleashed against Persian forces.

The verb "ran" (Hebrew: yarots, יָרֹץ) means to rush violently, capturing the speed and aggression of Alexander's campaigns. This wasn't cautious, calculated warfare but overwhelming assault. Historically, Alexander's battles at Granicus, Issus, and Gaugamela demonstrated exactly this fury—he personally led cavalry charges with reckless courage, repeatedly risking death to break enemy lines. His tactical genius combined with passionate intensity created unstoppable momentum.

Spiritually, this teaches that human rage and power, however impressive, remain under God's sovereign control. Alexander's fury served divine purposes—judgment on Persian pride and preparation for gospel advancement. Yet fury without divine sanction leads to destruction; Alexander's empire fragmented immediately after his death. Only Christ's righteous wrath against sin accomplishes eternal purposes, and His resurrection power surpasses all earthly might.

KJV Study — Public Domain

Historical & Cultural Context

The Battle of Issus (333 BC) exemplifies this "fury." Alexander, commanding about 40,000 troops, attacked Darius III's 100,000+ Persian army. Leading the elite Companion cavalry, Alexander personally charged through Persian lines seeking Darius. The ferocity so terrified Darius that he fled, causing Persian collapse. Similar fury characterized Gaugamela (331 BC), where Alexander's aggressive tactics broke the larger Persian force. Ancient sources describe Alexander's almost suicidal battlefield aggression—wounded multiple times, he fought with berserker intensity.

Reflection Questions

  1. How does Alexander's fury serving God's purposes teach us that God sovereignly uses even human rage to accomplish His will?
  2. What does the ram's inability to resist the goat's fury teach about earthly empires' ultimate fragility?
  3. How does human military fury contrast with Christ's righteous wrath that ultimately conquers sin and death?

Original Language Analysis

Hebrew · 14 words
וַיָּבֹ֗א1 of 14

And he came

H935

to go or come (in a wide variety of applications)

עַד2 of 14
H5704

as far (or long, or much) as, whether of space (even unto) or time (during, while, until) or degree (equally with)

הָאַ֙יִל֙3 of 14

to the ram

H352

properly, strength; hence, anything strong; specifically an oak or other strong tree

בַּ֣עַל4 of 14

that had

H1167

a master; hence, a husband, or (figuratively) owner (often used with another noun in modifications of this latter sense)

הַקְּרָנַ֔יִם5 of 14

two horns

H7161

a horn (as projecting); by implication, a flask, cornet; by resemblance. an elephant's tooth (i.e., ivory), a corner (of the altar), a peak (of a moun

אֲשֶׁ֣ר6 of 14
H834

who, which, what, that; also (as an adverb and a conjunction) when, where, how, because, in order that, etc

רָאִ֔יתִי7 of 14

which I had seen

H7200

to see, literally or figuratively (in numerous applications, direct and implied, transitive, intransitive and causative)

עֹמֵ֖ד8 of 14

standing

H5975

to stand, in various relations (literal and figurative, intransitive and transitive)

לִפְנֵ֣י9 of 14

before

H6440

the face (as the part that turns); used in a great variety of applications (literally and figuratively); also (with prepositional prefix) as a preposi

הָאֻבָ֑ל10 of 14

the river

H180

a stream

וַיָּ֥רָץ11 of 14

and ran

H7323

to run (for whatever reason, especially to rush)

אֵלָ֖יו12 of 14
H413

near, with or among; often in general, to

בַּחֲמַ֥ת13 of 14

unto him in the fury

H2534

heat; figuratively, anger, poison (from its fever)

כֹּחֽוֹ׃14 of 14

of his power

H3581

vigor, literally (force, in a good or a bad sense) or figuratively (capacity, means, produce)


Study Guide

Historical Context

This verse is found in the book of Daniel. Understanding the historical and cultural background helps illuminate its meaning for the original audience and for us today.

Theological Significance

Daniel 8:6 contributes to our understanding of God's character and His relationship with humanity. Consider how this verse connects to the broader themes of Scripture.

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study