Greek Interlinear

Luke 3:36 Interlinear

Which was the son of Cainan which was the son of Arphaxad which was the son of Sem which was the son of Noe which was the son of Lamech

Word-by-Word Analysis

#OriginalStrong'sEnglishDefinition
1τοῦG3588the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
2Καϊνάν,G2536Which was the son of Cainancainan (i.e., kenan), the name of two patriarchs
3τοῦG3588the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
4ἈρφαξὰδG742which was the son of Arphaxadarphaxad, a post-diluvian patriarch
5τοῦG3588the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
6ΣὴμG4590which was the son of Semsem (i.e., shem), a patriarch
7τοῦG3588the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
8ΝῶεG3575which was the son of Noeno, (i.e., noch), a patriarch
9τοῦG3588the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)
10ΛάμεχG2984which was the son of Lamechlamech (i.e., lemek), a patriarch

Verse Context

Luke 3:35 Which was the son of Saruch which was the son of Ragau which was the son of Phalec...
Luke 3:36 (current) Which was the son of Cainan which was the son of Arphaxad which was the son of Sem which was the son of Noe which was the son of Lamech
Luke 3:37 Which was the son of Mathusala which was the son of Enoch which was the son of Jared...

Continue Your Study