King James Version

What Does Daniel 2:40 Mean?

Daniel 2:40 in the King James Version says “And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iro... — study this verse from Daniel chapter 2 with commentary, cross-references, and original Hebrew word analysis.

And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise.

Daniel 2:40 · KJV


Context

38

And wheresoever the children of men dwell, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the heaven hath he given into thine hand, and hath made thee ruler over them all. Thou art this head of gold.

39

And after thee shall arise another kingdom inferior to thee, and another third kingdom of brass, which shall bear rule over all the earth.

40

And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise.

41

And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.

42

And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken. broken: or, brittle


Commentary

KJV Study Commentary
The fourth kingdom's description: "And the fourth kingdom shall be strong as iron: forasmuch as iron breaketh in pieces and subdueth all things: and as iron that breaketh all these, shall it break in pieces and bruise." The repeated emphasis on breaking and bruising characterizes Rome's military approach—overwhelming force, systematic conquest, brutal subjugation. Roman legions destroyed resistance mercilessly, exemplifying iron's crushing power. The verb "subdueth" (Aramaic: daqaq, דָּקַק) means to pulverize or crush to powder, capturing Rome's thoroughness in conquest.

This description proved historically accurate. Roman military might was legendary—disciplined legions, superior tactics, and relentless aggression crushed all opposition. When nations rebelled, Rome responded with devastating force (Jerusalem's destruction in 70 AD exemplifies this). Roman law similarly brooked no compromise—rigid, inflexible, systematically imposed. The empire's strength lay in this iron-like consistency and crushing power that subdued diverse peoples into unified system.

Prophetically, iron's strength yet brittleness prefigures end-times empire that appears invincible but will shatter at Christ's return. The same characteristics that enable conquest—rigid inflexibility, overwhelming force—ultimately cause fracturing. Human systems built on power rather than love inevitably fragment. This points to Christ's kingdom established through weakness (crucifixion) that proves eternally strong, and love (self-sacrifice) that genuinely unites diverse peoples. Where Rome's iron fist subdued temporarily, Christ's sacrificial love conquers permanently.

KJV Study — Public Domain

Historical & Cultural Context

Rome (753 BC founded, dominant from 146 BC, fell 476 AD West/1453 AD East) perfectly fulfilled this prophecy. Roman legions conquered the Mediterranean world, Gaul, Britain, Mesopotamia. Roman law organized diverse territories into unified system. Yet Rome's inflexibility contributed to eventual collapse—inability to adapt to changing circumstances, rigid hierarchy that stifled innovation. The empire that crushed all opposition eventually shattered from internal brittleness. Historians recognize how Rome's greatest strength (systematic force) became its fatal weakness (rigidity preventing adaptation).

Reflection Questions

  1. How does Rome's iron-like crushing power demonstrate that kingdoms built on force rather than love ultimately prove brittle?
  2. What does the same characteristic (inflexibility) being both strength and weakness teach about human systems' inherent limitations?
  3. In what ways does Christ's kingdom established through apparent weakness (crucifixion) contrast with Rome's crushing strength, yet prove eternally superior?

Original Language Analysis

Hebrew · 19 words
וּמַלְכוּ֙1 of 19

kingdom

H4437

dominion (abstractly or concretely)

רְבִ֣יעָיָ֔ה2 of 19

And the fourth

H7244

fourth; also (fractionally) a fourth

תֶּהֱוֵ֥א3 of 19

shall be

H1934

to exist; used in a great variety of applications (especially in connection with other words)

תַקִּיפָ֖ה4 of 19

strong

H8624

powerful

וּֽכְפַרְזְלָ֛א5 of 19

as iron

H6523

iron

כָּל6 of 19

all

H3606

properly, the whole; hence, all, any or every (in the singular only, but often in a plural sense)

קֳבֵ֗ל7 of 19

things and as

H6903

(adverbially) in front of; usually (with other particles) on account of, so as, since, hence

דִּ֤י8 of 19
H1768

that, used as relative conjunction, and especially (with a preposition) in adverbial phrases; also as preposition of

וּֽכְפַרְזְלָ֛א9 of 19

as iron

H6523

iron

תַּדִּ֥ק10 of 19

breaketh in pieces

H1855

to crumble or (transitive) crush

וְחָשֵׁל֙11 of 19

and subdueth

H2827

to weaken, i.e., crush

כָּל12 of 19

all

H3606

properly, the whole; hence, all, any or every (in the singular only, but often in a plural sense)

וּֽכְפַרְזְלָ֛א13 of 19

as iron

H6523

iron

דִּֽי14 of 19
H1768

that, used as relative conjunction, and especially (with a preposition) in adverbial phrases; also as preposition of

וְתֵרֹֽעַ׃15 of 19

and bruise

H7490

properly, to spoil (literally, by breaking to pieces); figuratively, to make (or be) good for nothing, i.e., bad (physically, socially or morally)

כָּל16 of 19

all

H3606

properly, the whole; hence, all, any or every (in the singular only, but often in a plural sense)

אִלֵּ֖ין17 of 19

these

H459

these

תַּדִּ֥ק18 of 19

breaketh in pieces

H1855

to crumble or (transitive) crush

וְתֵרֹֽעַ׃19 of 19

and bruise

H7490

properly, to spoil (literally, by breaking to pieces); figuratively, to make (or be) good for nothing, i.e., bad (physically, socially or morally)


Study Guide

Historical Context

This verse is found in the book of Daniel. Understanding the historical and cultural background helps illuminate its meaning for the original audience and for us today.

Theological Significance

Daniel 2:40 contributes to our understanding of God's character and His relationship with humanity. Consider how this verse connects to the broader themes of Scripture.

Cross-References

Verses related to Daniel 2:40 from Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

Test Your Knowledge

Continue Your Study