J

Joiada(3)

Joiada in the Bible — son of Eliashib the high priest (NEH 13:28). Joiada belonged to the tribe of Levi. Referenced in 2 scripture passages.

Profile

Gender
male
Tribe
Levi
Scripture References
2 references
Known Names
1 name
Relationships
1 connection

Biography

Joiada was a male Levite and a descendant of Aaron, known primarily as the son of Eliashib the high priest. His lineage placed him within the priestly tribe of Levi, emphasizing his role within the religious leadership of Israel. This connection highlights his significance in the priestly heritage during the post-exilic period.

Names & Titles

The name Joiada means 'y-h-v-h knows,' reflecting a theologically rich meaning tied to the knowledge of the LORD. This proper name, recorded in Nehemiah 13:28, was not given directly by God but carries a meaning that underscores divine awareness.

Family

Scripture explicitly records Joiada as the son of Eliashib, the high priest, as noted in Nehemiah 13:28. Beyond this father-son relationship, no other family connections are documented in the biblical text regarding Joiada.

Significance

Joiada’s importance in the biblical narrative stems from his priestly heritage as a descendant of Aaron and his direct link to Eliashib, the high priest. This connection situates him within the leadership responsible for the spiritual oversight of Israel during the time of Nehemiah. His presence in the text underscores the continuity of the Aaronic priesthood in the post-exilic community.

Names & Labels (1)

Joiadaproper name
Hebrew
יוֹיָדָע
Transliteration
yoyada
Meaning
y-h-v-h knows
Greek
Ιωαδα
Reference
NEH 13:28
Strong's
H3111

Family & Relationships (1)

son

Eliashib(NEH 13:28)

Notes

a descendant of Aaron

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Joiada in the Bible?

Joiada was a male Levite and a descendant of Aaron, known primarily as the son of Eliashib the high priest. His lineage placed him within the priestly tribe of Levi, emphasizing his role within the religious leadership of Israel. This connection highlights his significance in the priestly heritage during the post-exilic period.

Continue Your Study