King James Version

What Does Judges 1:6 Mean?

Judges 1:6 in the King James Version says “But Adonibezek fled; and they pursued after him, and caught him, and cut off his thumbs and his great toes.” — study this verse from Judges chapter 1 with commentary, cross-references, and original Hebrew word analysis.

“But Adonibezek fled; and they pursued after him, and caught him, and cut off his thumbs and his great toes.”

Judges 1:6 · KJV

Context

4

And Judah went up; and the LORD delivered the Canaanites and the Perizzites into their hand: and they slew of them in Bezek ten thousand men.

5

And they found Adonibezek in Bezek: and they fought against him, and they slew the Canaanites and the Perizzites.

6

But Adonibezek fled; and they pursued after him, and caught him, and cut off his thumbs and his great toes.

7

And Adonibezek said, Threescore and ten kings, having their thumbs and their great toes cut off, gathered their meat under my table: as I have done, so God hath requited me. And they brought him to Jerusalem, and there he died. their thumbs: Heb. the thumbs of their hands and of their feet gathered: or, gleaned

8

Now the children of Judah had fought against Jerusalem, and had taken it, and smitten it with the edge of the sword, and set the city on fire.

Read Judges 1 full chapter

Commentary

KJV Study Commentary
But Adoni-bezek fled; and they pursued after him, and caught him, and cut off his thumbs and his great toes.

Adoni-bezek's flight represents the typical pattern of ancient warfare: defeated kings attempted escape when battle turned against them, hoping to regroup forces or flee to allied territories. However, Judah's pursuit ensured complete victory—the Hebrew vayyirdephu acharav (וַיִּרְדְּפוּ אַחֲרָיו, "and they pursued after him") uses the same verb (radaf, רָדַף) employed throughout conquest narratives for relentless pursuit of fleeing enemies (Joshua 10:19, 2 Samuel 18:16). This demonstrates obedience to Deuteronomy 20:1-4's command to trust God and fight courageously.

The mutilation—cutting off thumbs and great toes—was a deliberate act rendering Adoni-bezek permanently unable to wield weapons or run in battle. Ancient Near Eastern warfare occasionally employed such mutilations to neutralize captured enemies without execution. In the Assyrian annals, for example, kings sometimes blinded or cut off the hands of captured rulers to prevent future rebellion while keeping them alive as examples. The thumbs and great toes were essential for gripping weapons and maintaining balance in combat, making this mutilation strategically effective.

Critically, verse 7 reveals this practice echoed Adoni-bezek's own treatment of conquered kings—"as I have done, so God hath requited me." The Hebrew gemul (גְּמוּל, "requited/recompensed") indicates divine retributive justice, the lex talionis (law of retaliation) principle embedded in Mosaic law (Exodus 21:23-25). This isn't arbitrary cruelty but measured justice—Adoni-bezek received precisely what he had inflicted on others. Reformed theology recognizes this as common grace manifestation: God's justice operates even through pagan recognition of moral law written on human conscience (Romans 2:14-15). However, believers must distinguish between divinely ordained judicial punishment and personal vengeance forbidden by Christ (Matthew 5:38-42, Romans 12:19).

KJV Study — Public Domain

Historical & Cultural Context

Mutilation of captives, while shocking to modern sensibilities, was documented across the ancient Near East. The Assyrian annals frequently describe punishments inflicted on rebel kings including blinding, cutting off hands, noses, or ears, and impalement. Egyptian reliefs show captives with severed hands presented to Pharaoh as evidence of victory. However, such practices were typically reserved for particularly troublesome enemies or as examples to deter rebellion—they were not routine treatment of all prisoners.

The specific targeting of thumbs and great toes reflects practical military considerations. A warrior's grip on sword, spear, or bow required functional thumbs, while balance and mobility in combat depended on intact feet. This selective mutilation created a living trophy—a defeated king who could never again pose military threat but would serve as permanent testimony to the victor's power. The number of mutilated kings under Adoni-bezek's table (seventy, v. 7) indicates this was his systematic practice, not an isolated incident.

Archaeological evidence provides context for treatment of captives during this period. Mass graves at Late Bronze Age sites sometimes show evidence of violence, while others suggest captives were enslaved rather than executed. The biblical law, however, commanded complete destruction (herem, חֵרֶם) of Canaanite populations (Deuteronomy 7:1-5, 20:16-18) to prevent religious syncretism, making Adoni-bezek's survival and transport to Jerusalem problematic from a strict application of the law. This hints at the incomplete obedience that characterizes Judges and creates ongoing spiritual problems for Israel.

Reflection Questions

  1. How does Adoni-bezek's recognition of divine justice demonstrate that conscience awareness of moral law is universal, even among pagans?
  2. What is the difference between recognizing God's justice in judgment (like Adoni-bezek) and experiencing redemptive grace through faith in Christ?
  3. How should Christians balance pursuit of earthly justice with Christ's command to love enemies and forgo personal vengeance?

Original Language Analysis

Hebrew · 12 words
וַיָּ֙נָס֙1 of 12

“fled”

H5127

to flit, i.e., vanish away (subside, escape; causatively, chase, impel, deliver)

אֲדֹ֣נִי2 of 12
H0
בֶ֔זֶק3 of 12

“But Adonibezek”

H137

adoni-bezek; a canaanitish king

וַֽיִּרְדְּפ֖וּ4 of 12

“and they pursued”

H7291

to run after (usually with hostile intent; figuratively [of time] gone by)

אַֽחֲרָ֑יו5 of 12

“after”

H310

properly, the hind part; generally used as an adverb or conjunction, after (in various senses)

וַיֹּֽאחֲז֣וּ6 of 12

“him and caught”

H270

to seize (often with the accessory idea of holding in possession)

אוֹת֔וֹ7 of 12
H853

properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)

וַֽיְקַצְּצ֔וּ8 of 12

“him and cut off”

H7112

to chop off (literally or figuratively)

אֶת9 of 12
H853

properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)

בְּהֹנ֥וֹת10 of 12

“his thumbs”

H931

the thumb of the hand or great toe of the foot

יָדָ֖יו11 of 12
H3027

a hand (the open one [indicating power, means, direction, etc.], in distinction from h3709, the closed one); used (as noun, adverb, etc.) in a great v

וְרַגְלָֽיו׃12 of 12

“and his great toes”

H7272

a foot (as used in walking); by implication, a step; by euphemistically the pudenda

Study Guide

Historical Context

This verse is found in the book of Judges. Understanding the historical and cultural background helps illuminate its meaning for the original audience and for us today.

Theological Significance

Judges 1:6 contributes to our understanding of God's character and His relationship with humanity. Consider how this verse connects to the broader themes of Scripture.

Test Your Knowledge

Judges 1 QuizTest your knowledge of this chapterJudges Book QuizComprehensive quiz for the entire book

Continue Your Study

Read Judges 1 with CommentaryAll Judges ChaptersComplete Judges QuizBible CharactersNave's Topical BibleAll Bible Quizzes